SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60. Let me repeat... A 120 x 60 button and no more that 3 lines of DEFAULT SIZE AND COLOR text.
You know, I'm really not a critic...but the photos really need work. Compostition, lighting, angles, color and density all need help. Worked in a photolab for a long time, have spent a lot of time shooting free lance..and these photos need some help!!
You know, I'm really not a critic...but the photos really need work. Compostition, lighting, angles, color and density all need help. Worked in a photolab for a long time, have spent a lot of time shooting free lance..and these photos need some help!!
yeah, i agree.
next time try to do a little better, they're not just test shots, obviously. you're trying to sell us your skills, so show us what you got.
You know, I'm really not a critic...but the photos really need work. Compostition, lighting, angles, color and density all need help. Worked in a photolab for a long time, have spent a lot of time shooting free lance..and these photos need some help!!
Maybe JJ should have pointed out that these are simply test shots. One thing I find about the folks in here when it comes to pictures is that no one can agree. Personally, I think they're perfect as test shots. They show everything necessary to evaluate the model, which is the entire point isn't it?
next time try to do a little better, they're not just test shots, obviously. you're trying to sell us your skills, so show us what you got.
the girl is pretty cute!
TM, no offense but you are wrong about they're not being test shots. I know JJ very well, I know her setup and I recognize her style. These ARE test shots. And if JJ isn't going to show you her abilities, I will. JJ took these shots in 2003, and I think they're great:
Maybe JJ should have pointed out that these are simply test shots. One thing I find about the folks in here when it comes to pictures is that no one can agree. Personally, I think they're perfect as test shots. They show everything necessary to evaluate the model, which is the entire point isn't it?
Like I said, I'm not a critic...and I wasn't commenting on the girl, I was just commenting on the actual shots. Test shots are used to evaluate the model, I agree, but that's exactly it-models portfolios don't contain amatuer shots cuz they wouldn't be able to sell themselves. When one understands photography and developing, one understands that the quality of the photo makes a HUGE difference on the end result. In this case, had the first photo had proper density and color, the model's skin would have looked better. Hell, now a days you can make such drastic improvments through corrections that some models are nothing in real life what they appear to be in their shots. With that said, if you're trying to sell something, use the tools available to you to do so. It's easier to sell a car when it's been washed and waxed then when it's filthy dirty and dull, right?
TM, no offense but you are wrong about they're not being test shots. I know JJ very well, I know her setup and I recognize her style. These ARE test shots. And if JJ isn't going to show you her abilities, I will. JJ took these shots in 2003, and I think they're great:
NOW THESE ARE SOME GOOD SHOTS, TEST SHOTS OR NOT!! WONDERFUL!
Comment