'Deep Throat' returning to theaters
 

http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2005/SHOWBIZ/...eep.throat.jpg
LOS ANGELES, California (Reuters) -- "Deep Throat," the infamous 1972 adult film that led to a government crackdown on pornography, is being re-released in theaters as a new generation of lawmakers wages a renewed assault on smut, trade paper Daily Variety reported in its Tuesday edition.

The release of the Linda Lovelace opus, which was banned at the time in 23 states, coincides with the premiere of the documentary "Inside Deep Throat," which hits theaters in New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Boston on Friday.

The original film, which was made in six days for $25,000 and has allegedly grossed more than $600 million, will not be ready until at least February 18, the paper said. Las Vegas-based Arrow Prods., which owns the rights to the mob-funded "Deep Throat," started striking 10 prints on Monday, it added.

Five of the prints will be edited to garner an "R" rating, which allows admission to children aged under 17 if accompanied by an adult.

The documentary, co-produced by Brian Grazer, the Oscar-winning filmmaker of "A Beautiful Mind," is rated NC-17, which denies admission to anyone aged 17 and under.

It shows how "Deep Throat" popularized a form of sexual pleasure previously considered taboo. But the Nixon administration was not amused, sending in the FBI to close down screenings, and taking legal action against the film's director, Jerry Damiano, and stars.

Meanwhile, a bill that would increase fines for smutty broadcasts to $500,000 per incident from $32,500 is wending its way through Congress with bipartisan support, inspired in part by Janet Jackson's "wardrobe malfunction" at the Super Bowl last year.
:pimp

A classic...too bad only a fraction of the people here would remember it

I look forward to viewing in a theatre =)

The documentary is going to have more action than the re-release of the porn itself...the porn re-release is getting an R rating...its going to be edited to all hell

That's a classic.

Aside from the expected opposition from the righties, weren't there allegations by some of the actors (LL?) that they were coerced into doing what they did?

If that is the case (non-consentual), then doesn't re-releasing that movie (albeit edited) conflict with current standards for adult entertainment?

What do you think?

-Dino

Looks like it will be a good viewing!

A) she's lied

B) she's dead

C) She's dead lying whore.

I own the original release on VHS!