Paid White House propaganda "reporter" forced to quit over GAY PROSTITUTE SCANDAL.
 

ahahahahahahahahahahahaha


This is the fucking best thing I've ever read. This is the guy who asks President Bush questions like:

"Senate Democratic leaders have painted a very bleak picture of the U.S. economy. Harry Reid was talking about soup lines, and Hillary Clinton was talking about the economy being on the verge of collapse. Yet, in the same breath, they say that Social Security is rock-solid and there's no crisis there. How are you going to work -- you said you're going to reach out to these people -- how are you going to work with people who seem to have divorced themselves from reality?"

Of course Americans aren't going to care because TV won't tell them to care, so they'll just replace him with another paid propaganda agent and move on. It's terribly sad that Americans have become too complacent to distinguish between journalism and propaganda. I realize you guys think you're important because you care about the things CNN tells you to care about, but you're being conditioned by the corporate elites in ways that sadly, you'll probably never understand. The philosophy of futility is alive and strong in the good old US of A.

http://www.nydailynews.com/02-10-200...p-239417c.html

http://us.news1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com...1860011963.jpg

Q Jeff Gannon. How did he get a White House pass, or what kind of credentials did he have?

MR. McCLELLAN: Just like anyone else who comes to the White House.

Q Hard pass?

MR. McCLELLAN: No, he had never applied for a hard pass. He had a daily pass. I think he's been coming for --

Q Was he coming for --

MR. McCLELLAN: Hang on. I think he's been coming for more than two years now.

Q Under what name?

MR. McCLELLAN: Sorry?

Q Under what name?

MR. McCLELLAN: Well, you have to get cleared. You have to -- just like anybody else that comes to the White House, you have to have your full name, your Social Security number and your birth date. So you have to be cleared just like anybody else.

Q So he was being cleared under James Guckert, or whatever his name is?

MR. McCLELLAN: My understanding, yes.

Q Okay, and how did he get picked to get a question asked at the last news conference?

MR. McCLELLAN: He didn't. The President didn't have a list. The President didn't -- he was in the briefing room. There are assigned seats in the briefing room. We didn't do any assigning of seats, and the President worked his way through the rows, and called on people as he came to them. He doesn't know who he is.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

bitter canadians with inferiority complexes make baby jesus cry. :1orglaugh

clueless....

Don't shoot the messenger, it's not my fault your favorite "journalist" turned out to be a fag pimp.

remember Jessica Lynch?

Did anyone actually ever hear of this guy before all this "scandal" broke?

Jessica who? I believe she went down the memory hole when she came back and said publicly that they made up the story of her "rescue".

Yes, I saw him ask the question I quoted in my original post.

cached page of his site ... funny stuff :1orglaugh


http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache...ient=firefox-a


EDIT;
reading that stuff reminds me of 12shits :1orglaugh

CNN - a supposed 'news' organization created a fake scenario because they assume their viewers are fucking morons. I'd be offended.

Also, Reuters and the AP have banned three major Papers in the US for editing their articles. One in NY, the other in Washington and I forget the third. That didn't make it to CNN either.

1984 - George Orwell

Wow. This is SPOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOKY

http://www.bltweb.net/mypictures/cia.gif

I think you mean, Fox News, not CNN.
CNN is a much bigger Bush basher than you, the line
you're supposed to use is that we all believe Fox News,
which tends to be conservative. Please read your
weekly liberal talking points more closely next time.

Funny your sig refers to presidential comments
in regards freedom but just lifts a couple of words
completely out of context when there's so much better
presidential commentary saying thingsliek that the
whole purpose of goverment ought to be to destroy
individual rights:


" The purpose of government is to rein in the rights of the people"

--Bill Clinton, during an interview on MTV in 1993


"You know the one thing that's wrong with this country? Everyone gets a chance to have their fair say."

-- Bill Clinton, May 29, 1993, The White House




"We can't be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans . . . ."

--William J. Clinton, USA Today, March 11, 1993


... a lot of the Asian societies that are doing very well now have low crime rates and high economic growth rates, partly because they have very coherent societies with strong units where the unit is more important than the individual
[referring to Communist China]
...
when we got organized as a country and we wrote a fairly radical Constitution with a radical Bill of Rights, giving a radical amount of individual freedom to Americans
...
so a lot of people say there's too much personal freedom. When personal freedom's being abused, you have to move to limit it. That's what we did in the announcement I made last weekend on the public housing projects, about how we're going to have weapon sweeps and more things like that

Bill Clinton, 1994

Can you say gestapo?

ahaha. and he mocked people for being gay on his website

Go back to TV land please. Here in reality we realize that all "mainstream" American media is government propaganda. The "left" vs "right" game they feed you is just to keep the rabble like yourself happy. You don't have a real liberal or conservative party, you have two parties that are controlled by the same group of corporations and bankers, and they basically play good cop bad cop. As I said please go back to the oversimplified guff you're so fond of, right now they're making a nice case to steal your social security you should be vaguely paying attention to.

You don't honestly believe that any of these anti gay people aren't in the closet, do you? Why else would they be so determined to repress gays? If they were comfortable with themselves they wouldn't care what other people do with their private lives.

I'd bet anything that Ashcroft has the biggest collection of gay child porn of the face of the earth hidden somewhere. You just know all these "religious" leaders jack eachother off in the sauna.

That's all CNN does. The best thing I've ever seen is Leslie (wolf) Blitzer interviewing President Musharraf. Pervez criticized the war in Iraq, and then at the end of the interview "wolf" came on and informed us that he talked to "someone" inside the Pakistani government, who told him that President Musharraf didn't mean to call the war a mistake. lmfao, I was literally in tears laughing. The US media would be unbelievably good entertainment if it weren't so scary that there are so many people out there who take it seriously. Some Americans even think they have the best news media in the world. :helpme

"Spooky" is a nice word for this.

hey man,
u made some good points about context, I'm not taking any shots at anyone here, just a note
I think FOX tv falls under the "Myth of Liberal Media" theory, that is, Conservatives run FOX and affiliates, and they call their own media liberal to detract from personal agendas.

There was some writer guy on the Daily show last night who made an interesting point regarding republican dominance and it's ties to a variety of media. (Plural medium) He was a Republican himself, and he made some really good observations about the power of internet WITH tv and so on. His premise of course is that the current administration runs most media. :2 cents:

The term liberal media was made up by pundits so it becomes a us and them situation. we are the minority we must stand together and its bullshit. If the media is so so liberal why was the Rush drug story broke by the National Enquirer?

If the media were "liberal" or "anti-Bush", they would be reporting on his abundance of failures instead of continuing on to spreading the next lie. It's funny that people actually believe CNN is against the President because it's not the same kind of blatant propaganda you find on Fox.

Next it's social security and Iran. I'll admit, it's going to be hilarious to watch Americans sit idly by and watch these cronies reverse the New Deal because the "media" says it's ok. It's amazing that when CNN, Fox, the NYT or whoever talks about the "social security crisis", no one says, "wait, what? Didn't we just give rich people and corporations massive tax cuts?". If you had any kind of real media left, these types of questions would be asked. "Didn't GWB say in the 70's that social security would be bankrupt in 10 years if we didn't change it to private accounts?" "Did he just say axis of evil?".

All the mainstream media does is parrot republican and democrat talking points. There's no such thing as a major journalistic institution in the US that still investigates policy, and reports in the best interest of the people. Talk to anyone who's worked at one of the major companies, it's all about how they can sell you sheep what they're about to do next. FYI, social security is over funded right now by over a trillion dollars, and instead of going to the people like it's supposed to, it's going to go to JP Morgan and the rest of them. Why do you think they want it so badly? It's a huge prize.

Quite sad that the largest glimpse of reality you can find on American television comes from a comedian on a comedy channel.

That's a great picture. :1orglaugh

:1orglaugh

Yes, very ... hummmm.... touching...remember that Bush doesn't know him ( :1orglaugh ) ....

In fact, it is sort of " gay " , isnt'it ??? :winkwink: