GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   German law forces out-of-work females to take sex jobs or lose unemployment (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=424407)

dj pussy 01-30-2005 10:25 AM

German law forces out-of-work females to take sex jobs or lose unemployment
 
Women told, 'Work in brothel, or else'

A provision in the German welfare system is forcing out-of-work women to chose between taking jobs in the sex industry or losing their unemployment benefits.
Once one of the most generous systems in Europe, Germany's unemployment program has been reformed to require those out of work to take jobs for which they are qualified, or lose benefits. In the case of women, females below the age of 55 who have been out of work for a year or more must take any available job offered.

The full legalization of prostitution two years ago ? with brothel owners now paying taxes and employee health insurance ? has created an awkward situation at German job centers where employers can access the official government database of those seeking work, reports the London Telegraph.

One 25-year-old waitress, an unemployed information technology professional, had indicated a willingness to work in a bar at night and had past experience working in a cafe. A potential employer, finding her profile promising, contacted the job center about hiring her. Only after the young woman called to inquire about the job did she learn the employer was a brothel. When she refused the position, she was threatened with cuts to her unemployment benefits.

Centers that do not penalize job seekers who refuse offered positions are subject to lawsuits by the employers.

"There is now nothing in the law to stop women from being sent into the sex industry," says Merchthild Garweg, a Hamburg lawyer. "The new regulations say that working in the sex industry is not immoral any more, and so jobs cannot be turned down without a risk to benefits."

Garweg notes that women who have past experience as telemarketers or call service workers have been offered positions with telephone-sex services. New laws permit sex-oriented employers to advertise in the job centers and provide for the suing of job centers that refuse to accept their ads.

robfantasy 01-30-2005 10:29 AM

wow thats amazing, if its real

Manowar 01-30-2005 10:30 AM

thats awesome :1orglaugh

sumphatpimp 01-30-2005 10:36 AM

makes the german government liable as hell if one of these women gets aids.

Paul Markham 01-30-2005 10:40 AM

And this from the country that forces German webmasters to get proof the German members are over 18. :Oh crap

No wonder their economy is in trouble.

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE 01-30-2005 10:45 AM

Now thats crazy if true.

E.Kant 01-30-2005 10:54 AM

Really starnge and weird .. havent heard that yet , must hit up my friends in germany and ask how about their unemployed wives :)

NaughtyRob 01-30-2005 10:57 AM

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :thumbsup

Too bad it wouldnt work here. Most bitches that wont work here are fat and ugly.

Warden 01-30-2005 11:29 AM

Now replace German with American and this thread would be pages long!!

gangbangjoe 01-30-2005 11:34 AM

germany is fucked up


time to leave

Big Red Machine 01-30-2005 12:59 PM

Now they should make them go on a Atkins diet and do cardio everyday then we'll all be going there for content .Unemployed = Fat Ass Jerry Springer watchers

Trax 01-30-2005 02:10 PM

lol.....

maddox 01-30-2005 02:31 PM

I cannot believe that german government would be so stupid, where do you have this information from?:)

suesheboy 01-30-2005 02:40 PM

I need a link on that one please.

TheMob 01-30-2005 02:42 PM

hehe, the is just hilarious

bureaucracy

dcortez 01-30-2005 02:46 PM

This is an inevitable issue (true or not).

If a country has a 'social safety net' which relies on earnest participation of its citizens, where does it draw the line?

If a job opportunity is legal, and available, should a 'welfare' recipient 'do their part'. What are grounds for passing on a job? Religious? Moral? Personal dislike?

Separating 'porn' (legal adult entertainment) and other subjectively unappealing (to some) 'jobs' from clearly enforcable work opportunities becomes a social nightmare.

RE: risks -- every trade has its risks and a set of safety standards (if not, complete organizations) to minimize it. The janitor who gets an infection from cleaning up and the 'sex trade' worker who gets an 'industry-related' disease should not have different avenues of recourse.

This is a very important issue and it's not going to go away.

-Dino


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123