Is Schoolgirl CP? [PIC]
 

I know some list owners are very puritanical about schoolgirl stuff which is kind of weird as it's obvioulsy just fantasy/role playing. Weird how the same lists will have some bitch being jackhammered by...well a fucking jackhammer! and think that's perfectly normal behavious (no judgement from me) but some woman who's obviously over the age of consent puts on a check skirt and calls her self a 'schoolgirl' and they get all self fucking righteous about it.

Your input on this issue needed desperatedly! :winkwink:

Here's an example!

http://www.asianteenschoolgirl.com/t...rl-gallery.jpg

Lux

over 18 right? Whats the prob?

Exaclty my point! Thank you very much sir!

Lux

the girl on the right has some very nicely shapen lil boobies..... thats like .. my pefect size :-p

I have no problem with such pictures.

who cares these chicks are hideous.

methinks i know who took that picture...

...as for schoolgirl, i'm all for it. anyone who gets all sassy about it can bite my foaming crotch..!

if their over 18 its not cp. schoolgirls are hot

If you want to get a lot of replies, you will probably have to accuse some big program owner of promoting CP because he has a girl with pigtails on his site. Name names if you want drama. :1orglaugh

All sites with girls with pigtails, skirts, or long socks should be classified as CP and the owners should be jailed for life with no trial.

And no girl over 18, who looks under 18 to anyone on the planet, should eer be allowed to work in the adult industry.

That's what some people think. :1orglaugh

It's not CP unless the genitals are focused on or they are engaged in a sexual act. Posing nude, even if she is a minor is not CP (unless the genitals are focused on). That's a crock if you ask me, but that's what it is. :-(

Thanks for the lesson in 'fake drama creating'. I'll keep it in mind for the next time I'm bored and I want a laugh. :1orglaugh

LUx

Man, these girls look like minors.

No their definitely schoolgirls not miners! Miners would have hard hats on with little flashlights on the front.

Lux

It's the same as 18+ models who look like 12 year olds. It's sick and it's a legal loophole. If you find it attractive, you are a pedo.

Well drag my ass of to jail in that case!

Lux

We love all legal over 18 schoolgirls!

:) :) :)

I'm also one that believes if the girls are legal then its all good. Dress them like schoolgirls if you want.

better than than any of the chicks you've set me up with... :disgust


In the Bedroom:
Dressing up and role playing is fine at any age. Schoolgirl outfits are the most popular, last I heard.

In the Biz:
18-22. AND NO HIGHER! Don't put girls older than 22 in schoolgirl outfits, and DON'T try to pawn 30 year old milf's as catholic school girls to your clientel.

Qualifications:
You can find real school girls @ school... Yep, it's true. There's millions of students. But they must meet at least (3) of the following criteria:

• Is on the cheerleading squad.
• Is wearing a uniform.
• Is wearing glasses.
• Is carrying Books.
• Gives head to anyone who can catch a football.

:pimp

And if you can notice that contrast - YOU ARE OLD.

they just have to be over 18

I like schoolgirls but that was a real dumb thing to say, I know people who just got out, it ain't no game! "There's some real Gs' doing time!"

Thanks for that very substantial info dude.

so... your saying that small boned, petite women w/ pretty innocent faces shouldn't be allowed to model, because *you* think they look younger than they really are? hehe, fucking surfers should just stick to lurking GFY for PICS and leave the posting alone... your sig will remain worthless regardless..

Point taken and I too know people both in jail and who've done time but I'm proud to say none of them where in for CP and you know what? If they where they'd be no fucking friend of mine!

PS: Lighten up would ya!

Lux

age is the only factor...+18 is fine

just for the sake of discussion, ignoring arbitrary law and focusing on morality -- what is the difference between a girl thats 17 years and 11 months old and a girl on her 18th birthday?

some 17 year olds are ready, some 25 year olds still arent. its all about using discretion to know the difference at any age

miners aren't the same as minors. And it's "they're" not "their" :winkwink:

I'm saying that a physically unmatured 18 year old is the same thing sexually as a 12 year old.
You pedos get so defensive of your deviant ways. You should keep quiet.

Thanks for pointing out my incorrect use of their.

The comment was actually a vague attempt at humour but I do appreciate that not everybody gets my particular brand of humour so that's fine.

Thanks again!

Lux

PS: And if you ever see any other grammatical cock ups in one of my posts please do let me know.

Hmmm schoolgirls..In Homers voice

If there's grass on the field: you can play ball.

If she's over 13, it's all good! :banana

not into asians myself... but they do look underage to me

I heard that before, are you the guy that keeps repeating this phrase, or is there some guy going around saying this perverted sh#$. I would wait until she's 17 (almost 18) so I can say at least I tried to play by the rules.

You mean if she's horny she's good to go, but are you ready to go to jail for that young booty!

The only thing relevant - I thought there was a court case re: intentionally dressing up models that were 'of age' to appear 'under age' - and that it didn't come out in our favor.

I could be mistaken - but it's worth some research.

me thinks they just wear uniforms

who cares if theyre 18+? thats the point of this thread.

it's the audience you're playing into when you do that. If someone doesnt want to list that kind of stuff, its their preogative.

i sure as hell know, if they dont look 18+ i wouldnt list them.. just because they are, doesnt mean someone who is against that shit does and wont turn you into the authorities or something....

It's the 1st time i said this onb GFY. Calm Down!! It's just fucking joke!!!

In Canada it can be CP
 

In Canada, the federal Criminal Code creates specific offences against making, distributing, possessing or accessing child pornography.

"Child Pornography" is defined by the Criminal Code to include visual representations that show a person who is or is depicted as being under 18 years of age in what appears to be explicit sexual activity, visual representations whose dominant characteristic is the depiction of a sexual organ or the anal region of a person under the age of 18 and any written material or visual representation that advocates or counsels sexual activity with a person under the age of 18 [Emphasis added]

The definition of "visual representation" applies equally to electronic media, such as web sites.

The important thing to note here is that the person need only be depicted as being under the age of 18.

A web site that encourages access to these materials could be implicated in the distribution of these materials and could be charged with ?aiding and abetting? others in the commission of these offences.

Also, there is currently a Bill being considered by Parliament that proposes amendments to the Criminal Code. Amongst other things, Bill C-20 would make the following changes:

(a) amend the child pornography provisions to broaden their application and limit the available defences to such a charge;

(b) add a second category of written material to s. 163.1(1) ?the dominant characteristic of which is the description, for a sexual purpose, of sexual activity with a person under the age of eighteen years that would be an offence under this Act?. As a result, written material would not longer have to advocate or counsel illegal sexual activity with a person under 18 to fall under the definition of child pornography

Please note that this posting is intended for educational and discussion purposes only and not as legal advice.


You can icq me at 232035213

That is totally fucked. So if a site has models that are 25 and are waring 'schoolgirl' clothing and sucking lolly pop's: that CP.

Depends on the Circumstances
 

It depends on the specific facts in each case and whether or not the model is "depicted as being under 18 years of age in what appears to be explicit sexual activity" etc.

The case law in Canada has looked at various criteria to determine whether or not the material was infringing. However, all that might change if Bill C-20 is made into law. If that happens, prosecutors may have an easier time of making a case that the material is CP.




Disclaimer: This post is intended for educational and discussion purposes and not as legal advice.

Those chicks sure are ugly.

You all are a bunch of pedos

They aren't 18... which just goes to show you...

There is little difference between 17 years and 363 days and 18 years old.

You should be ashamed of your self lusting after those teenie tiny titties

Don't say 'teenie tiny titties' like that man. It's turning me on!!!!

Lux

Same opinion here !

thats what lionel hutz said when he was defending me in court anyway