GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   UK Navy pays for soldier's boob job (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=406076)

Sarah_Jayne 12-21-2004 03:56 AM

UK Navy pays for soldier's boob job
 
Boob job for sailor

The Navy has paid for a boob job for a man.

The junior rating in his 20s had a breast reduction op to remove saggy "man's boobs" after losing a lot of weight.

A Wren on the same assault ship - HMS Albion - has had breast enhancement surgery reports The Sun.

The Ministry of Defence paid a total of £37,838 for cosmetic surgery treatments last year, including nose jobs and tummy tucks.

The Navy insisted the operations were carried out in military hospitals for "serious clinical reasons".

http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_1218023.html

Johny Traffic 12-21-2004 03:57 AM

:thumbsup

Tim Tighty 12-21-2004 03:57 AM

WTF? :eek7

Doctor Dre 12-21-2004 03:58 AM

word, well spent tax money

European Lee 12-21-2004 03:58 AM

:1orglaugh @ 'Saggy Man Boobs'

Regards,

Lee

bryany 12-21-2004 03:59 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tim Tighty
WTF? :eek7

Sarah_Jayne 12-21-2004 04:00 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by European Lee
:1orglaugh @ 'Saggy Man Boobs'

Regards,

Lee


After that line they didn't really need to say they got the story from The Sun, eh?

Manowar 12-21-2004 04:01 AM

:1orglaugh

Roald 12-21-2004 04:02 AM

I was about to post someones name but I won't

:thumbsup

BRISK 12-21-2004 04:20 AM

Man boobs are a "serious clinical reason"?

PHPdude 12-21-2004 04:24 AM

you dont need to be good looking to go to the navy.

Repetitive Monkey 12-21-2004 04:25 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by BRISK
Man boobs are a "serious clinical reason"?
The reason for this is that their surgeons need excersize in their profession so that they can save as many lifes as possible when the real deal comes around.

tical 12-21-2004 04:36 AM

gynocemastia (man boobs) can be VERY painful for those that have it

CheneyRumsfeld 12-21-2004 07:07 AM

no boobs were harmed in the posting of this thread.

Peaches 12-21-2004 07:41 AM

This has been happening in the US since at least the 1960's. Military surgeons are paid a salary, not per surgery. If you want a boob job, tummy tuck, etc. and they have time to do it - needless to say you are at the bottom of the list - and you pay for supplies, they will do it. Military plastic surgeons need practice performing these surgeries and if they don't do enough, they have to leave for more training. This situation is beneficial to all involved and doesn't cost the taypayers a penny.

DeadFidel 12-21-2004 07:47 AM

I have no problem believing that at all:)

PS: Sarah, how you doing? I hope peace is finding its way back into your heart.

JamesK2 12-21-2004 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by tical
gynocemastia (man boobs) can be VERY painful for those that have it
I have em and it's very bad :(

Plz donate money to [email protected]

Tim 12-21-2004 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Doctor Dre
word, well spent tax money
No change there then.

Sarah_Jayne 12-21-2004 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DeadFidel
I have no problem believing that at all:)

PS: Sarah, how you doing? I hope peace is finding its way back into your heart.

Managing to manage is the best way I think I can put it. The downside of working from home is being alone all the time but I am sure I will be okay. Thank you for asking :)

Wiggles 12-21-2004 11:02 AM

they were turning on fellow sailors :winkwink:

alexg 12-21-2004 11:02 AM

ananova is such a useless website

r3ap3r 12-21-2004 11:06 AM

:banana Horray for Man-Boobs :banana

xxxoutsourcing 12-21-2004 11:11 AM

Good to see tax payers money going on something contructive.

JDog 12-21-2004 11:13 AM

The US Military pay's for breast reductions too. But never seen it on a male! :1orglaugh

My cousin had one paid by the government when her husband was in the Navy because of the back problems it causes.

jDoG

Scott McD 12-21-2004 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxoutsourcing
Good to see tax payers money going on something contructive.
Nothing unusual there then...

Peaches 12-21-2004 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxoutsourcing
Good to see tax payers money going on something contructive.
Again, the tax payers aren't paying any extra for it. In fact, it would actually cost the taxpayers MORE to send these doctors out for training.

bizmak 12-21-2004 05:01 PM

:1orglaugh

pornguy 12-21-2004 05:03 PM

It may have been cheaper for them to put up the money for that than to loose the soldier and have to train a new one.

Easton 12-21-2004 05:04 PM

is he a tranny?

xclusive 12-21-2004 05:06 PM

well it is the navy and it could be classified as floatation devices...:Graucho

Nanda 12-21-2004 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Peaches
This has been happening in the US since at least the 1960's. Military surgeons are paid a salary, not per surgery. If you want a boob job, tummy tuck, etc. and they have time to do it - needless to say you are at the bottom of the list - and you pay for supplies, they will do it. Military plastic surgeons need practice performing these surgeries and if they don't do enough, they have to leave for more training. This situation is beneficial to all involved and doesn't cost the taypayers a penny.
Hm, interesting...as far as I know the military will cover any plastic surgery that will repair what they damaged...or if it's something that is really causing you physical pain....like breast reductions

I know they don't do implants, lipo. nor tummy tucks. I was a military wife for 5 years, had many female friends who tried to get tummy tucks and they clearly will not perform that type of plastic surgery!

Head 12-21-2004 05:41 PM

I guess that's reasonable.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123