GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - Cops can do this to you??? What would you do?

http://www.infowars.com/articles/ps/...jected_dmv.htm
Albany Woman Forcibly Injected With Drugs After Protesting Regulations of DMV
Infowars.com
Violet Jones
December 15, 2004

Here's another terrifying story from the expanding police state. This activist, a Constitutional scholar, had created a free speech display on her private property.

When the police towed off her property she called to complain, the police chief told her that she would be arrested. She was -- and forcibly drugged and sent to the State Hospital for the violent and criminally insane.

When Americans used to hear stories like this from Russia or East Germany we would be shocked and horrified. Now shocking stories like this are emerging on an ongoing basis.

The article questions whether Bliss Alexandra was criminally insane or not. What an appalling question -- should people be hauled off, drugged and jailed for complaining at the police chief's discretion? How representative is this twisted analysis of media's pervasive attitude of support and apathy for the actions of the out-of-control police?

How unlike this story is the one about the doctor who receiveda visit from Homeland Security for complaining too much to the Veteran's Administration?

We are becoming conditioned to live in a totalitarian State where police are the gods and the public are the serfs, to be controlled, manipulated, drugged and imprisoned at the whims and mercy of the police state.

Empire Journal | December 14, 2004

Albany residents beware.

What happened to Bliss Alexandra could happen to you.

Anger police chief James Turley and you might end up at a state hospital for the violent and criminally insane, hundreds of miles away from your family and friends, forcibly injected with mind altering drugs.

Bliss Alexandra who is also known as Darlene Early---or Darlene Barely as the Albany Police Department call her, was returned to Albany on Wednesday, Dec. 8 after completing an involuntary stay at Kirby Forensic Psychiatric Center in Manhattan, ordered by Albany City Court judge Thomas Keefe after she exercised what she thought were her constitutional rights.

She is scheduled to appear in Albany City Court before Keefe Thursday, Dec. 9.

After Alexandra called the Albany Department of Public Safety to complain about her personal property being towed by police from a private driveway, Chief Turley responded by telling her he was either going to arrest her or have her removed to the Capital District Psychiatric Center.
And that he did.

Not only did he cause her arrest on three felony charges but caused her to be involuntarily committed with serial killers and rapists and subjected to the forced injection of antipsychotic drugs.

Her alleged crime?exercising free speech on private property.

The legal scholar and constitutionalist, with no apparent mental illness history, was originally committed to Kirby in September for a 90-day evaluation by Judge Keefe because he claimed two examiners from the Albany County Correctional Facility had determined she had no comprehension of the charges against her or of court procedure because she refused to discuss the case with them.

Kirby, operated by the state Office of Mental Health as is CDPC, is a maximum security, 168 bed hospital on Ward?s Island. Opened in 1995, it provides secure treatment and evaluation for the forensic patients of courts of New York City and Long Island.

But Alexandra isn?t in the court system of New York City nor was she violent nor were her alleged crimes of a violent nature.

She a resident of Albany County which is served by the Mid-Hudson Psychiatric Center in Poughkeepsie.

And then there?s CDPC in their own back yard at 75 New Scotland Ave.

So why was she removed to Kirby?

Albany Police have charged Alexandra with three felony counts of second degree possession of a forged instrument but not only do the arrest reports and felony complaints allegedly contain false statements and information, but there appear to have been egregious violations of her constitutional rights as well as statutory law in her involuntary commitment and medication including an alleged falsified court order and denial of her right to counsel.

Nagging questions exist about why and how she was removed from the Capital District area, her family, friends and legal counsel and sent to Kirby and the ensuing alleged rights violations.

Perhaps her knowledge of the Constitution and the court system is exactly why she was arrested in the first place-------and her challenge of state?s Department of Motor Vehicles and what she claims is the state?s unconstitutional regulation of the right to travel.
<snip>

The courts have held that the Fifth Amendment Due Process clause permits the government to involuntarily administer antipsychotic drugs to a mentally ill defendant facing serious criminal charges in order to render that defendant competent to stand trial but only if treatment is medically appropriate, is substantially unlikely to have side effects that may undermine the fairness of the trial and taking account less intrusive alternatives. Assuming that the defendant was not dangerous to himself or others, he could not be ordered involuntarily to take antipsychotic drugs solely to render him competent to stand trial without consideration of important questions about trial related side effects and risk of drugs to be used.

The higher courts have found that a government may not deprive any person of liberty without due process of law

According to recent reports, in an attempt to counteract increasing political activism and dissent with government, in an attempt to stifle public opposition and attempts at reform, police agencies nationwide are simply levying false charges against their critics, labeling them ?mental? in an attempt to not only discredit them but to ?teach them a lesson?

The American Civil Liberties Union says that dozens of activists and organizations have been subjected to the scrutiny of the FBI and have initiated Freedom of Information Law requests to determine the scope and purpose of the FBI.

The FBI denies singling out individuals or organizations for surveillance or investigation based solely on activities protected by the Constitutional guarantees of free speech.