GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Third Party Processing is now categorised as Non-Compliant (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=402847)

the indigo 12-14-2004 05:47 PM

Third Party Processing is now categorised as Non-Compliant
 
We?re delighted to announce that Metacharge has completed the migration to a card scheme compliant ?direct merchant account? service model.

All Metacharge merchants now trade under their own named accounts in accordance with the latest Visa and Mastercard directives.

Third party processing is now categorised as non-compliant by the card schemes. We invite any merchant still using a third party account to apply for direct merchant status to safeguard their ability to accept card payments.

Theo 12-14-2004 05:49 PM

where are you using Metacharge? I like their system, but expensive fees....

Pornwolf 12-14-2004 05:50 PM

Whachu talkin 'bout Willis?

http://www.declicmag.com/html/28/file/f10.jpg

European Lee 12-14-2004 05:51 PM

There have been various rumors about 3rd party processing being non-compliant over the past few months that i have been privy to.

Still waiting on a confirmation or rebuttal of these claims from some of the processors directly.

Regards,

Lee

JayRevenue 12-14-2004 05:54 PM

Anyone know if this is true?

Lacoste 12-14-2004 05:55 PM

If this is true, its the end of CCbill, ibill, verotel (? if it applies to on US based bizs as well) and a few others...

seer 12-14-2004 05:57 PM

Lots of changes coming up folks.

Lacoste 12-14-2004 06:02 PM

It'll fuck up a few mainsteam businesses as well but then again its easy for them to get a merchant account and their C/B risk is minimal.

baddog 12-14-2004 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by the indigo
We?re delighted to announce that Metacharge has completed the migration to a card scheme compliant ?direct merchant account? service model.

All Metacharge merchants now trade under their own named accounts in accordance with the latest Visa and Mastercard directives.

Third party processing is now categorised as non-compliant by the card schemes. We invite any merchant still using a third party account to apply for direct merchant status to safeguard their ability to accept card payments.

Let me get this straight . . . it is your contention that all 3rd party processing is now Visa an MC non-compliant?

When did this become effective?

the indigo 12-14-2004 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by baddog
Let me get this straight . . . it is your contention that all 3rd party processing is now Visa an MC non-compliant?

When did this become effective?


That is an email I received from MetaCharge... I know they are pretty solid in the business so I'm only the messager :)

Kimmykim 12-14-2004 06:34 PM

Perhaps the folks at Metacharge or whatever it's called should research and understand the difference between third party processing (otherwise known as unregulated aggregating in most cases) and legitimate IPSP models.

Do they also have some news on Chicken Little for us all?

baddog 12-14-2004 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by the indigo
That is an email I received from MetaCharge... I know they are pretty solid in the business so I'm only the messager :)
Sounds to me like they are just trying to scare people into using their service.

Kevin2 12-14-2004 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kimmykim
Perhaps the folks at Metacharge or whatever it's called should research and understand the difference between third party processing (otherwise known as unregulated aggregating in most cases) and legitimate IPSP models.

Do they also have some news on Chicken Little for us all?


:1orglaugh :1orglaugh you crack me up Kimmykim

Mike Okitch 12-14-2004 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kimmykim
Perhaps the folks at Metacharge or whatever it's called should research and understand the difference between third party processing (otherwise known as unregulated aggregating in most cases) and legitimate IPSP models.

Do they also have some news on Chicken Little for us all?

I agree.

Companies like paypal (for those who do mainstream things), moneybookers and iKobo help one in accepting credit cards without the need of a merchant account. Wouldn't that make them third party processors which consequently would make them non-compliant?

xclusive 12-14-2004 11:27 PM

It's much ado about nothing They are just trying to ring up some end of year business...:2 cents:

Paul Markham 12-14-2004 11:31 PM

It's good that we got a merchant account then. Just need to activate it.

Rand 12-15-2004 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kimmykim
Perhaps the folks at Metacharge or whatever it's called should research and understand the difference between third party processing (otherwise known as unregulated aggregating in most cases) and legitimate IPSP models.

Do they also have some news on Chicken Little for us all?


A voice of reason.

Ditto what she said.

whatif_3 12-15-2004 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by the indigo
We?re delighted to announce that Metacharge has completed the migration to a card scheme compliant ?direct merchant account? service model.

All Metacharge merchants now trade under their own named accounts in accordance with the latest Visa and Mastercard directives.

Third party processing is now categorised as non-compliant by the card schemes. We invite any merchant still using a third party account to apply for direct merchant status to safeguard their ability to accept card payments.

the thread title is misleading, moron

Cypro/Globill, is that you?

Manowar 12-15-2004 11:24 AM

i doubt it.

Warden 12-15-2004 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by European Lee
There have been various rumors about 3rd party processing being non-compliant over the past few months that i have been privy to.

Still waiting on a confirmation or rebuttal of these claims from some of the processors directly.

Regards,

Lee

I too have heard pretty much the same thing and even that a ccertain 3rd party processing company has about 6 to 7 months tops before they go IBill on everyone. I can't give away my source, but it's pretty reliable.

European Lee 12-15-2004 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Warden
I too have heard pretty much the same thing and even that a ccertain 3rd party processing company has about 6 to 7 months tops before they go IBill on everyone. I can't give away my source, but it's pretty reliable.
Im wondering if its the same processors that i have been hearing about.

Glad to see im not the only one having access to this information.

Regards,

Lee

BRISK 12-15-2004 03:32 PM

:uhoh

Hinc 12-15-2004 03:41 PM

Any hint as to what billing co that might be? :)

Kimmykim 12-15-2004 04:54 PM

I love all the rumors about this processor and that processor. As we've seen in the past, don't count a processor out until they are truly out. Hell, at this point, I wouldn't be surprised to see IBill put their shit out of the can and get it back up and running.

Rumors are just that.

Marcus Aurelius 12-15-2004 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by baddog
Sounds to me like they are just trying to scare people into using their service.

sean416 12-15-2004 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by European Lee
Glad to see im not the only one having access to this information.

You're an idiot. I'm sorry, but these posts you make are ridiculous. No one beleives you.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123