![]() |
Fuck ThinkX from DutchTeencash.com - Do you like these girls (pic)
Fucking ThinkX from dutchteencash.com keeps complaing I found and shot these 2 models for him. He picks the 5th unsharp photo (look below) and keeps posting it like a dumb fuck trying to bring disrespect to my name, not appreciating any of the work I did for him. All potential photographers, do not shoot for ThinkX, he is a lier and a cheap skate too.
The rest of the guys let me know how you like these two models: http://www.ipasak.com/banners/nn/underw/miriam_01.jpg http://www.ipasak.com/banners/wet-T/...iriam_5644.jpg http://www.ipasak.com/banners/nn/underw/maria_01.jpg http://www.ipasak.com/banners/maria/..._22%20copy.jpg http://www.thinkx.tv/post/miriam.jpg |
First pic has a really bad facial expression and it kinda looks like the girls has a black eye, second pic has a really bad composition and is overexposed, third pic has no facial expression at all, fourth pic is good, fifth pic is out of focus.
One in five isn't a lot :2 cents: |
the girls are fine but u should try to find a new job -- u suck at photographing
u gotta respect ur clients too right fuckin moron |
looks good man, but I can see where he would not want them, but the girls are hot... just read on some lighting, and photog stuff a little more.....
great amature stuff though IMHO....:2 cents: |
Quote:
that is fair enough, actually I appreciate it. Anyone else? |
they dont look too bad to me :2 cents:
then again Im no photographer, lol Girls are definatly cute though |
Quote:
All I am saying is that Mr. Dumb Ass ThinkX from Dutchteencash.com wants Matrixcontent quality for US$ 400 budget, why the hell did he talk to me then? He can fucking see my quality at www.ipasak.com , or is he fucking blind too apart from stupid? |
the first girl looks like she was up all night on coke.
2nd girl is hot 3rd doesnt look sexy with that expression on her face :2 cents: |
What kind of setup are you using? (body, glass, lighting, etc.)
|
Quote:
|
I only like the third photo. The girl outside and wet is ok, and the concept is nice, but way over exposed.
|
Ok, what lens are you using and are you shooting auto, manual, etc? That outside picture looks like a tamron lens to me :)
|
Quote:
I appreciate the overexposure comments: I do use a flash meter, the problem is that you have to shoot 200 photos in 3-5 hours in 4-5 different sets of clothes and room settings. So, you do not have time to use a flash meter for each photo, and obviously as you are moving around the model with your camera to get a different angle, the exposure changes.... |
First: Get yourself a real lens. Stay with Canon glass, and only canon glass; it's worth it. Try the 24-70 2.8; it's an amazing lens and gives you plenty of coverage in all different locations. Plus it can let in a lot of light when you need it to so that you don't need to go crazy with the flash or studio lights. The lens is expensive, yes- but do a google search for this lens, everybody that buys one loves it. I wouldn't trade mine for anything.
Second: Try shooing in Av for a while to fine-tune your shooting before switching back to manual, or- take some shots in manual and then switch to Av and see what Canon would have recommended; and then compare which image looks better. These days, being a good photographer is as much about having good equipment and knowing how to use it as it is about subject and composition. Hope this helps. |
Quote:
I have been looking at that lense already for a while, but wanted to buy it together with Canon20D, thank you four advice, it is very helpful |
first one looks like some one hit her in her face...or shes lacking sleep? The rest are ok thow
|
First girl looks very strung out, and the last shot is very blurry.
|
Contsructive criticism is all this is and just my opinion.
Pic # 1: Try not to cut the models limbs off Pic # 2: Try not to shoot outdoors in bright sunlight. Early am or late pm. Pic # 3: Not bad but judging from shadows and catch light seems the fill was a little to far to the left. Pic # 4: Pretty good and the best. Try and meter more for skin tones. Pic # 5: Try not to position the model that close to the background. Not sure if you were using af but that could have thrown the camera off. Also not sure if it was a dof problem since her hair seems to be in focus but her ass is blurry? Overall not bad except for # 5 so I would give you a 4/5 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I hope you will follow them soon posting more of these two cuties naked! thanks |
Quote:
|
pretty cool to post pics you sold us exclusively here, why dont you post the models telephone numbers like you did last time lol
more important : we are looking for a fresh new solo teen topless/nude for a new site to start February 2005, if you got a nice girl (semi) exclusively post an email icq etc ill contact you (no not you martin we want quality) 4 series a month min 50 pics 1000x1500 72 dpi, movies are a nice option, payment in advance or 50/50, for refs ask tootie/adultwebdesignstudios etc |
Quote:
if you want to shoot on a cheap budget of ThinkX plus listen to his bullshit how we wants non-nude models, but then asks to shoot them in a shower, contact Mr. ThinkX. Mr. ThinkX also does not mind leaving some of the models unpaid, mayby it is the Dutch smoking mentality :glugglug In other words, if you are looking for an idiot employer, please contact Mr. Dumb Fuck ThinkX from Dutchteencash.com Mr. ThinkX why the fuck don't you contact Paul Markham to shoot for you if you want quality. Cause you are a fucking cheap cu-nt |
Dude, I really like your content. Too bad you don't have that many hardcore scenes...
|
I don't think they look bad at all.
I personally would take out the bad/out of focus shots before I submitted them though. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
good to know, that I am not the only one who thinks that Mr. ThinkX from DutchTeenCash.com is a cheap fucking cu_nt |
Quote:
|
Bad quality pics :mad:
|
id agree, they all pretty much suck... we could go through them all one by one... but lets not and say they suck.
|
Quote:
Get your dicks out rub them erect and ask yourself which one of these girls will fuck you? |
This thread is WEIRD. You are actually admitting you suck, and you are pissed because he says you do too. You smoking crack?
|
Sorry hit the submit button to early.
We sell to guys who jerk off, empathize and look at your product through the eyes of the end user. The biggest problem with these pictures has nothing to do with lighting, lens, camera or photography experience. It's about the guy behind the camera and what the models think of him. Remember we are pornographers and we sell the fantasy of getting fucked. Now look at the above pictures and tell me how they help you. It's about what's between there ears, not what's between their legs. I unsderstand the problem, I think this is the guy we used to shoot for, but he did not want to pay our prices. Guess he got the value he deserved. |
Quote:
Only drawback is we are 1,500 Euros a day. For references see this About us |
Quote:
|
You've got to hate people that expect the world for nothing. Tight asses that just bitch and whinge are definately something to avoid. Haven't had too many problems with them because I avoid them, but I hear about them all the time. I think the biggest improvment would be just a little expression in their faces, i like the 4th one though, that is nice. Keep at it. :thumbsup
|
I wouldn't but them either.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
and i got some new teens that are not up now - so hit me up in case you are interested. |
you've got some hot bishes
|
Quote:
If Paul Markham tells me, you paid him EUR 1,500 for a shoot, I will publicly apologize to you on GFY. But I think that the chances of that are 0.1%, cause you are a cheap fucking cu_nt and cannot afford Paul Markham :2 cents: |
Quote:
|
VERY NICE!! Coll! Can I work with her??
|
nice pics
|
Quote:
|
The girl in the red, is not bad....
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:44 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123