GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Bush is killing civilians faster than Saddam did. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=388762)

Dirty F 11-15-2004 02:51 AM

Bush is killing civilians faster than Saddam did.
 
Is that part of the Iraqi Freedom thing? Just eliminate everybody?

Iraq is a total shithole now. Way more unlivable than it was before. It will take ages to rebuild the country. Billions dollars extra will be needed.

And this all because of weapons of md. that were never found and most likely never made.

Totally insane.

This is most likely the most useless war ever.

BoNgHiTtA 11-15-2004 02:53 AM

Lets say it all together...

Oiiiilllllllll

The amount of Oil in Iraq is staggering. And, at current estimates, we will run out of oil by the year 2040 or something like that.

So, we now control more oil.

chupachups 11-15-2004 02:53 AM

Well... he was reelected so.. I guess weŽll se another 100k dead civilians the next 4 years.

WarChild 11-15-2004 02:55 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Chupachups
Well... he was reelected so.. I guess weŽll se another 100k dead civilians the next 4 years.
Well if they didn't want to die they shouldn't have been born Iraqi Terrorists, now should they?

Dirty F 11-15-2004 02:56 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by WarChild
Well if they didn't want to die they shouldn't have been born Iraqi Terrorists, now should they?
Iraqi terrorists? Who? Like the ones who flew into the wtc?

quiet 11-15-2004 02:56 AM

it would be comical, if it wasn't so sad.

smack 11-15-2004 02:57 AM

Yeah, half of us know; the other half don't care. It's a sad decade for america.

WarChild 11-15-2004 02:57 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Battuss
Iraqi terrorists? Who? Like the ones who flew into the wtc?
Like sarcasm much?

chupachups 11-15-2004 02:58 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by WarChild
Well if they didn't want to die they shouldn't have been born Iraqi Terrorists, now should they?

No thats true, damn idiots.. :)

chupachups 11-15-2004 02:59 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by quiet
it would be comical, if it wasn't so sad.

Yes.... its a f*cking disgrace...

Fake Nick 11-15-2004 03:02 AM

the world is better off without Saddam ....


the people of Iraq are NOT causing a great resistance , foreign terrorists are......


dunno if anyone remembers but when Bagdad came in hands of American Troops there were celebrations in the centre of Bagdad, thousands of people gathered in the streets , statues of Saddam were destroyed , ect

this war overall on the long term was a VERY good thing both for the world and for the Iraqi people


each year thousands of children died because of the UN sanctions , now that Saddam is gone those sanctions no longer exist and the rebuild can start once all FOREIGN TERRORIST who for some reason love killing or at least trying to kill American Troops have been either captured or killed


:2 cents:

Paul Markham 11-15-2004 03:16 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by BoNgHiTtA
Lets say it all together...

Oiiiilllllllll

The amount of Oil in Iraq is staggering. And, at current estimates, we will run out of oil by the year 2040 or something like that.

So, we now control more oil.

So you are happy to think the US stole the oil by the use of military force?

But I doubt if the US will be running Iraq in 5 years time, the Mullahs will and then you can hope they still want to sell oil to you.

BoNgHiTtA 11-15-2004 03:18 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by charly
So you are happy to think the US stole the oil by the use of military force?

But I doubt if the US will be running Iraq in 5 years time, the Mullahs will and then you can hope they still want to sell oil to you.

I didn't say I was happy about it, but its the facts.

And whoever runs it, we will still have a hand in that oil. I guarantee that. You don't really think well just up and hand over the country without locking in oil deals.

Paul Markham 11-15-2004 03:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fake Nick
the world is better off without Saddam ....


the people of Iraq are NOT causing a great resistance , foreign terrorists are......


dunno if anyone remembers but when Bagdad came in hands of American Troops there were celebrations in the centre of Bagdad, thousands of people gathered in the streets , statues of Saddam were destroyed , ect

this war overall on the long term was a VERY good thing both for the world and for the Iraqi people


each year thousands of children died because of the UN sanctions , now that Saddam is gone those sanctions no longer exist and the rebuild can start once all FOREIGN TERRORIST who for some reason love killing or at least trying to kill American Troops have been either captured or killed


:2 cents:

The problem is the US's making, they were the ones who invaded on false reasons.

Fake Nick 11-15-2004 03:27 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by charly
The problem is the US's making, they were the ones who invaded on false reasons.

not really ...... they based everything on the info gathered by intelligence , .. if later that info appears false the invaders cannot be blamed for this , ... only if they KNEW the info was false you have a valid point ...

SuckOnThis 11-15-2004 03:36 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fake Nick
the world is better off without Saddam ....
The world would be better off without quite a few dictators in power, especially George W. Bush

Quote:

Originally posted by Fake Nick

the people of Iraq are NOT causing a great resistance , foreign terrorists are......

Total and complete bullshit. The Iraqi people are resisting an invasion of their country.

Quote:

Originally posted by Fake Nick

dunno if anyone remembers but when Bagdad came in hands of American Troops there were celebrations in the centre of Bagdad, thousands of people gathered in the streets , statues of Saddam were destroyed , ect

That was completely staged propaganda and everyone knows it. Don't tell me you still believed Bush when he said the Iraqi's would welcome us with open arms. If Saddam was included in their election he would most likely win.

Quote:

Originally posted by Fake Nick

this war overall on the long term was a VERY good thing both for the world and for the Iraqi people

Yep, lying to invade a country is always a good thing.

Quote:

Originally posted by Fake Nick

each year thousands of children died because of the UN sanctions , now that Saddam is gone those sanctions no longer exist and the rebuild can start once all FOREIGN TERRORIST who for some reason love killing or at least trying to kill American Troops have been either captured or killed

The sanctions were more like US sanctions. It was the sanctions that were responsible for the deaths of millions. It was the sanctions that turned Iraq from a modern society to a less than a third world country.

monro 11-15-2004 03:37 AM

The Muslims have always killed their own people to get "sympathy" from stupid reporters in the west. Palestinians are putting children in the battle line instead of hiding them in a cellar as normal caring people do. In Algeria most victims from the Muslim attacks was and is still, their own people. Iranian army forced children to clear minefields. The Russians at least used pigs....
In Iraq they (the Muslims) are murdering like hell, and you blame USA!! Can't believe it! A free election is around the corner, if the terrorist is liked by the people in Iraq, why do they not wait until the election to get into power? Can you figure out why! I can. They know to well they are not liked by the people and try to make as much trouble as possible to stop a democracy in Iraq. And they succeeds, just look at this board.

Fake Nick 11-15-2004 03:41 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SuckOnThis
The world would be better off without quite a few dictators in power, especially George W. Bush



Total and complete bullshit. The Iraqi people are resisting an invasion of their country.



That was completely staged propaganda and everyone knows it. Don't tell me you still believed Bush when he said the Iraqi's would welcome us with open arms. If Saddam was included in their election he would most likely win.


Yep, lying to invade a country is always a good thing.



The sanctions were more like US sanctions. It was the sanctions that were responsible for the deaths of millions. It was the sanctions that turned Iraq from a modern society to a less than a third world country.


you have no valid points :)

SuckOnThis 11-15-2004 03:44 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fake Nick
you have valid points :)
I know :)

Buzz 11-15-2004 03:55 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SuckOnThis

The sanctions were more like US sanctions. It was the sanctions that were responsible for the deaths of millions. It was the sanctions that turned Iraq from a modern society to a less than a third world country.

Guess the sanction's main aim was buying Iraq oil at really LOW prices in exchange for low quality food. We could only imagine how many billions had US earned on the oil, and how many were earned by companies contracted by the "oil in exchange for provisions" program.
It's all about money, not about politics

Jakke PNG 11-15-2004 03:57 AM

I watched Full metal jacket a few days back and it made me wonder if movies of this war is made in a few decades.

I bet their feel would be a lot similar to vietnam movies.

Theo 11-15-2004 04:07 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fake Nick
the world is better off without Saddam ....


the people of Iraq are NOT causing a great resistance , foreign terrorists are......


come on, get real

what terrorists crap? Who ever is against the american benefits is called terrorist. During the greek dictatorship (1967-1974) those that were against the military authorities in greece were called terorrist and anarchist by the US media and govt. At least now with the plethora of news sources you should have more realistic view of things.

Iraq was attacked and invaded. Period. Iraqis have every right to fight and calling them terrorists shows ignorance.

Fake Nick 11-15-2004 04:15 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Soul_Rebel
come on, get real

what terrorists crap? Who ever is against the american benefits is called terrorist. During the greek dictatorship (1967-1974) those that were against the military authorities in greece were called terorrist and anarchist by the US media and govt. At least now with the plethora of news sources you should have more realistic view of things.

Iraq was attacked and invaded. Period. Iraqis have every right to fight and calling them terrorists shows ignorance.

this reply shows ignorance ...

you = sheep


you don't bother to do research , you just take over ALL the ideas of anti Bush supporters / anti War supporters


The Iraqi people as a whole is not doing the resistance , some are of course , but most are foreigner , foreigners that came to Iraq to help out their 'fellow muslim' . Same thing happened in Afghanistan when Russia invaded them. And this will happen every time a country invades a muslim country.

One thing is true though more and more Iraqis are joinging these foreign terrorist in their battle for obvious reasons ( family killed by american troops , .... ) BUT the persons LEADING the resistance are NOT Iraqis !! And that is what it is all about in war LEADERSHIP .

These foreigners came to Iraq with one mindset , and that is to kill americans . That is what they do, that is what they love.

WarChild 11-15-2004 04:16 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Soul_Rebel
come on, get real

what terrorists crap? Who ever is against the american benefits is called terrorist. During the greek dictatorship (1967-1974) those that were against the military authorities in greece were called terorrist and anarchist by the US media and govt. At least now with the plethora of news sources you should have more realistic view of things.

Iraq was attacked and invaded. Period. Iraqis have every right to fight and calling them terrorists shows ignorance.

But what about say Jordian born millitants in Iraq fighting? Are they terrorists or Iraqi's too?

Theo 11-15-2004 04:29 AM

whatever man, 100k soldiers have problem to handle some "foreigns" that came overnight from nowhere cause they hate americans.

Fake Nick 11-15-2004 04:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Soul_Rebel
whatever man, 100k soldiers have problem to handle some "foreigns" that came overnight from nowhere cause they hate americans.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

yeah you know what you are talking about

Joe Citizen 11-15-2004 04:42 AM

I hope this war turns into an absolute nightmare for the USA, so much so that it leaves permanent psychological scars on the American psyche. Like Vietnam, only worse.

Maybe then the world will finally see a little less war.

Corleone 11-15-2004 04:51 AM

They don't care about the civilians


but the 1300 dead americans ....

+ 8000! hurt

most stupid war ever...

soldiers pay with their lives coz the people are stupid... thats just sad

bizmak 11-15-2004 05:25 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by BoNgHiTtA
Lets say it all together...

Oiiiilllllllll

The amount of Oil in Iraq is staggering. And, at current estimates, we will run out of oil by the year 2040 or something like that.

So, we now control more oil.

sad but true.

Goatse 11-15-2004 05:48 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fake Nick
the world is better off without Saddam ....
Not really. Under Saddam's regime, there was order. Despite international sanctions resulting from the first Gulf War, people could feed themselves and their loved ones. They could leave their homes and enjoy relatively normal and peaceful lives. As long as they didn't speak against their leader or try to overthrow him, everything was fine. In contrast, today's Iraq is chaotic and dangerous.

If an election were held in Iraq today, the secular Iraqis would vote en masse for Saddam, while the religious Shiites would elect an Islamic fundamentalist leader.

Corleone 11-15-2004 05:54 AM

http://www.dewaarheid.nu/mei01/fallM1.jpg

evanmorgan 11-15-2004 05:54 AM

the problem is, everyones a civilian in Iraq, because their army, fucked off the moment we got there. Just because the people with guns arent wearing military uniform doesnt mean they are civilians, thats why the figures look huge. Theres 100000 missing iraqi soldiers........

mardigras 11-15-2004 06:36 AM

Yeah, but homos can't marry. Slightly more than half of the voters approved this message.:1orglaugh

jayeff 11-15-2004 06:49 AM

Hell, what's another few thousand deaths?

http://amigaphil.planetinternet.be/c...a lt=nowar10b

Fake Nick 11-15-2004 06:51 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Goatse
Not really. Under Saddam's regime, there was order. Despite international sanctions resulting from the first Gulf War, people could feed themselves and their loved ones. They could leave their homes and enjoy relatively normal and peaceful lives. As long as they didn't speak against their leader or try to overthrow him, everything was fine. In contrast, today's Iraq is chaotic and dangerous.

If an election were held in Iraq today, the secular Iraqis would vote en masse for Saddam, while the religious Shiites would elect an Islamic fundamentalist leader.


dont make me laugh!!

people were fuckin starvin by the dozens !! crime was VERY fuckin high!!

jeez , you know nothing about how Iraq was under rule of Saddam yet you make the most dumb assumptions! !

webmaster x 11-15-2004 06:55 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Chupachups
Well... he was reelected so.. I guess weŽll se another 100k dead civilians the next 4 years.
yes man slaughter again,

groark 11-15-2004 06:58 AM

True.

Jer 11-15-2004 07:00 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by BoNgHiTtA
Lets say it all together...

Oiiiilllllllll

The amount of Oil in Iraq is staggering. And, at current estimates, we will run out of oil by the year 2040 or something like that.

So, we now control more oil.

It would be cheaper to invest in biodiesel, alcohol and other renewable fuel sources

Peacemaker 11-15-2004 07:53 AM

And again:

Dear Mr. Bush and his army, please move your ass to africa, were rebels kill civilians every day, in certain staates.

show us your moral..

oh, wait.. there is no oil? no leader wanted to kill your dad?

let me think..
something is wrong here

Peacemaker 11-15-2004 07:55 AM

http://www.aperfectcircle.com/bodies.html

just watch this and may be, if you are smart enough and open your eyes, you will find yourself in that video clip..


god bless america

VeriSexy 11-15-2004 07:55 AM

Poor planning, air strikes by coalition forces and a "climate of violence" have led to more than 100,000 extra deaths in Iraq, scientists claim.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3962969.stm
http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsPackage...5&section=news
http://www.newswise.com/articles/view/507991/


:mad: :mad: :mad:

directfiesta 11-15-2004 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fake Nick
this reply shows ignorance ...

you = sheep


you don't bother to do research , you just take over ALL the ideas of anti Bush supporters / anti War supporters


The Iraqi people as a whole is not doing the resistance , some are of course , but most are foreigner , foreigners that came to Iraq to help out their 'fellow muslim' . Same thing happened in Afghanistan when Russia invaded them. And this will happen every time a country invades a muslim country.

One thing is true though more and more Iraqis are joinging these foreign terrorist in their battle for obvious reasons ( family killed by american troops , .... ) BUT the persons LEADING the resistance are NOT Iraqis !! And that is what it is all about in war LEADERSHIP .

These foreigners came to Iraq with one mindset , and that is to kill americans . That is what they do, that is what they love.

For once you are right...

Foreigners are causing this non-stop wars... about 12000 of them un Falllujah and another 130 000 thru Iraq:

Quote:

Extent of Foreign Fighters in Iraqi Insurgency
May Be Less than Often Portrayed
By Jim Krane
Associated Press
May 3, 2004

U.S. officials have for months publicly promoted the notion that foreign fighters and terrorists are playing a major role in the anti-American insurgency in Fallujah and the rest of Iraq. By blaming foreigners, U.S. authorities hope to quash the idea that Iraqis are rising up against military occupation and frame the conflict as part of the wider war on terror. However, foreigners play a tiny role in Iraq's insurgency, many military experts say.

In Fallujah, U.S. military leaders say around 90 percent of the 1,000 or more fighters battling the Marines are Iraqis. To date, there have been no confirmed U.S. captures of foreign fighters in Fallujah - although a handful of suspects have been arrested. Those who have spent time inside Fallujah have described a city consumed with the fight - fathers and sons fighting for the local mujahedeen and wives and daughters cooking and caring for the wounded. "The whole city supports this jihad," said Houssam Ali Ahmed, 53, a Fallujah resident who fled to Baghdad when his neighborhood was caught in the fighting. "The people of Fallujah are fighting to defend their homes. We are Muslim mujahedeen fighting a holy war."

http://www.globalpolicy.org/security...03fighters.htm

This was in May, when the administration was claiming the reviolt was only fooreigners, as you say.


So before telling others that they have no information or no research.... you should do a bit yourself ...
This way you would look less of an idiot as you di now...

Now go listen to more propaganda and come spit it back out as a good little american punk.

Peacemaker 11-15-2004 07:57 AM

ps... add this to the video-clip:

http://www.yubanet.com/artman/publis...le_14657.shtml

(read and dont ignore)

theking 11-15-2004 08:09 AM

In response to the thread title...good...as it is civilians in Iraq that are opposing the interim Iraqi Government and the Coalition forces. The Iraqi military was defeated in three weeks...thus it is not military forces that the Coalition forces are engaged with.

gangbangjoe 11-15-2004 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Chupachups
Well... he was reelected so.. I guess weŽll se another 100k dead civilians the next 4 years.

SuckOnThis 11-15-2004 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fake Nick
dont make me laugh!!

people were fuckin starvin by the dozens !! crime was VERY fuckin high!!

jeez , you know nothing about how Iraq was under rule of Saddam yet you make the most dumb assumptions! !


Like you know how it was there. Open your eyes beyond Fox.

webmaster x 11-15-2004 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by smack
Yeah, half of us know; the other half don't care. It's a sad decade for america.
it's a sad world that we live in. really sad.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123