GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   My take on the Peterson case an verdict (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=387492)

theking 11-12-2004 01:29 PM

My take on the Peterson case an verdict
 
I sit aside everything that was said at the trial other than the fact that his wife washed up at a location just a few miles from where he put himself. The reason I sit aside everything else that was said at the trial is because I think all of it proves nothing more than the man is a liar...and an adulterer.

The fact that his wife washed up a few miles from where he put himself...makes me think that he killed his wife...but I do not think that because I think that he killed his wife that the prosecution has presented a case that raises to the level that the law requires..."beyond a reasonable doubt". Thus I would vote to aquit.

I suspect that this new jury is going to vote guilty as they brought in a verdict within a few hours. I will not be surprised if they even vote for 1st degree murder.

I personally do not think that (assuming that he killed his wife) he is guilty of either 1st degree or 2nd degree murder...but instead manslaughter. In other words...some type of confrontation took place and he accidently killed her.

kenny 11-12-2004 01:32 PM

I predict 20% - 30% of first page threads being Peterson Trial related within 1 hour.

Thats my take on this

Fake Nick 11-12-2004 01:32 PM

can he still confess and say what really happened if he gets 1st degree murder ??

kenny 11-12-2004 01:33 PM

I'd rather get death penalty then the fucking life in prison being a child murderer

theking 11-12-2004 02:14 PM

Yep...1st degree verdict.

mardigras 11-12-2004 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fake Nick
can he still confess and say what really happened if he gets 1st degree murder ??
Only if he wants to fuck up his appeals:glugglug

tony286 11-12-2004 03:33 PM

The thing I dont understand if he didnt want to be with her . Why didnt he just leave?

theking 11-12-2004 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by tony404
The thing I dont understand if he didnt want to be with her . Why didnt he just leave?
Good point...and another reason for a probable accidental killing.

Love Brokers 11-12-2004 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking
Good point...and another reason for a probable accidental killing.
A C C I D E N T A L??????????? Holy fuck!

Paul Markham 11-13-2004 12:06 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking
Good point...and another reason for a probable accidental killing.
WTF?????

Quote:

The headless, limbless corpse of Laci Peterson and the decomposed remains of the foetus were found washed up on a San Francisco Bay beach in April 2003.

Prosecutors told the court Peterson strangled or smothered his pregnant wife to escape what he may have viewed as the drudgery of marriage.
Nothing about this sounds like an accident to me.

But it also seems they had no evidence he killed her. Just insinuations and circumstantial.

pornguy 11-13-2004 12:08 AM

I don't think he did it.
In any case, he may be able to go to trial again in a couple of years, and may be prove this time that he didn't do it.
You never know.

pornguy 11-13-2004 12:09 AM

anyway, I'd rather get the death penalty than life in prison.
And we aren't talking federal here... we're talking state prison. That sucks!!!!

theking 11-13-2004 02:18 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by charly
WTF?????

Nothing about this sounds like an accident to me.

But it also seems they had no evidence he killed her. Just insinuations and circumstantial.

There was zero forensic evidence to indicate that the head and limbs were detached other than by natural decomposition of the body and/or elements. Thus Peterson did not decapitate her or remove her limbs.

Since there is zero evidence of Peterson having an angry or violent nature...from childhood to adulthood...I suspect his wife and he had a verbal confrontation that led to a physical confrontation and during that confrontation he accidently killed her. He may have put a "choke hold" on her to subdue her (one of my favorites that I have used more than once) and she died as a result. It is not a common thing for a person to die from a choke hold but it does happen from time to time. That is why most police forces do not use the "choke hold" to subdue a perp any more. None the less...there are multiple ways that he could have accidently killed her.

He did not have a viable motive to intentionally kill her.

Pornwolf 11-13-2004 02:22 AM

I don't understand why the nation's attention was so focused on this one murder case. Lacey was a hottie though.

baddog 11-13-2004 02:23 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fake Nick
can he still confess and say what really happened if he gets 1st degree murder ??
the time for confession is before the verdict, not after

baddog 11-13-2004 02:27 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by charly
WTF?????

Nothing about this sounds like an accident to me.


Pay attention . . . he did not cut her head off, and the prosecution doesn't even expect anyone (not even you) to think that he did.

The head came off because it was in the fucking ocean for 2 months or something . . . and the fish were hungry.

The reason it was 1st degree is because they say he started planning it when he bought the boat back in October, so they say he had been planning it for 2 months.

Motive, he did not want to be a daddy.

smack 11-13-2004 03:03 AM

I hope he gets death. He is a blemish on the face of humanity.

Honeyslut 12-15-2004 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking
having an angry or violent nature...from childhood to adulthood...I suspect his wife and he had a verbal confrontation that led to a physical confrontation and during that confrontation he accidently killed her. He may have put a "choke hold" on her to subdue her (one of my favorites that I have used more than once)
Dude, you have been hanging with the wrong women.. LOL



:winkwink:

tony286 12-15-2004 10:45 AM

I hope I never have to go to court on the flimsy evidence they got scott peterson on its fucking scary. He was found guilty by the media before the trial started.

Candice 12-15-2004 10:49 AM

This is a very evil crime. The fact that the two victims should have been able to rely on Peterson's protection as a father and husband makes this all the much more to stomach. Even a stranger killing the two of them would have been more acceptable than this.....

:2 cents:


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123