US Troops Reportedly Gassing Fallujah
 

This is total anti-American BS.


The ONLY gases the U.S. uses is tear gas.

HA HA The only gas they are breathing is the tank exhaust fumes as we drive over their bodies...

islamonline?


uh huh

Pig shit.

I hope not ... but everything is possible ...

After all, who developped and is still developping chemical weapons ....

Goes with the " nuke 'em all " attitude...

I never knew liberation was so complicated....

By the way, it seems the flowers that were supposed the great the american savior were ordered at 1800flowers.com ...

Never arrived damn !!!

Gassing the enemy in this situation probably will reduce the number of coffins coming home by a 1,000.

It is there own fault.

They are terrorists resisting liberation.

What's wrong with gassing them?

Bush won a huge vistory on a platform of wiping out the terrorists. That is what he is doing.

:(

Idiot.

Bigger idiot with a mental illness.

"FALLUJAH, November 10 (IslamOnline.net & News Agencies)"

I love their way of claiming other news sites are reporting it too

"& news agencies"

haha .. nice

Your post are always so ... well ... so ... profound ....

:1orglaugh

islamonline.org


:1orglaugh

Your brain is always so ... well ... so ... mentally ill ....

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

hhmm. quite interesting.

This one you will have to expalin to me.

Oh whait. thats right it was these people that have been blowing up things all over the world, and killing men women and children.

This is the war for OIL. Not terror.

What's the point of using gas to kill tens of people on the street? That just doesn't make sense. One might want to use gas to kill thousands of people, or if the people were in bunkers of some sort but not for a handful of people on a street.

How original ...

Yes that's right. It is for the oil.

Why get the oil for free by lifting the sanctions and doing a deal with Saddam when you can spend $100 billion, lose a thousand of your soldiers' lives and risk your election by taking it by force.

= definition of idiot

How mentally ill ...

Congrats. You get the trophy for being the dumbest, most mentally ill surfer on the whole of GFY.


:waaaaahh

Excuse me? I did not write the article nor did I say I agreed with it or believed it. The story is out there and I brought it up here for discussion as is currently going on a number of sites/blogs/usenet. Had you heard about it before I posted it? I bet not. True or not it is interesting to know what they are saying. I watch/read news from around the world and a multitude of sources. If you want things narrow-beamed you're probably better off staying out of my threads.:winkwink:

Now US have men In the country able to controll the oil to a greater degree. And a USfriendly administration in place once/if they leave. With saddam in power saddam controlled it.

I dont think bush thought he "risked" his election by invading iraq, rather the oposite. He felt he had to do something after 9/11 even though it was kind of misdirected. It's his thing, the fear of terrorists is what got him re-elected and obviously many americans thinks fighting in iraq = killing terrorists out to harm america.

I personally refer to islamonline.org for all my fact based journalistic needs......

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :glugglug :glugglug :glugglug

I say gas the fuckers.

Can I be the one who pushes the button? Please? :winkwink:

Could happen.

Looks like the moslem version of FOX NEWS :glugglug

Can you link your source on that comment please?

http://www.medialens.org/

Look in the center of the page where it says

latest MediaLens media alert [expand]

And click [expand] for the media alert for Thursday, November 11, 2004. This is a followup on a previous story. To see the original, click their sidebar where it says media alerts and scroll down that page for articles from Nov 2nd and 4th.

That is such BS... I don't agree with the war and thought it was about oil originally too... but Iraq really doesn't have all that much oil (compared to other countries) and it would be soooo much easier and cheaper to just buy the oil. Even if an American company came in there and started drilling the oil, how would the US get it? They would buy it...

I really think fear helped Bush get re-elected, that and I feel a lot of Americans just wanted to "spite" the rest of the world, and terrorists... Like, we know you don't like him, so we will vote for him. That may sound stupid but its how a lot of people are.

lmfao

I know you're a moron, but I didn't even think you were so brain dead and gullible to post propaganda like this. Do you hate your country so much?

Thanks. Does Michael Moore own that site? LMAO:1orglaugh :thumbsup

"The fatal weapons led to the deaths of tens of innocent civilians, whose bodies litter sidewalks and streets, they added."

HAHAHAHAH. They litter the sidewalks and streets. What bullshit... and they say our media is bad :)

somany CNN tards in this THREAD, im staying the fuck out! :321GFY

LOL

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

++++++++

Greatest Oil Reserves by Country, 2003
2002
rank Country 2003 proved reserves
(billion barrels)
1. Saudi Arabia 261.7
2. Iraq 115.0
3. Iran 100.1
4. Kuwait 98.9
5. United Arab Emirates 63.0
6. Russia 58.8
7. Venezuela 53.1
8. Nigeria 32.0
9. Libya 30.0
10. China 23.7

http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0872964.html

------------------

Goog thing they don't have much ...

And you were allowed to vote ????



:1orglaugh

Red Ezra accidently gasses himself with an egg fart

that site needs to be taken offline

they have videos of them attacking our troops ! :feels-hot

http://www.islamonline.org/English/N...rticle04.shtml

They have a great word for people like you: SCUMBAG

Imagine that.

:1orglaugh

Would not surprise me at all. War sucks.

Iraq has alot of it. And for US to buy, iraq would have to sell it. Look at the oilprices go up cause of the general instabillity in iraq (even though US is in overall controll of the oil). Now think what saddam could do to it if he deciced to keep every drop of iraqi oil of out US hands?

But it's ofcourse more to the war then just the oil. Some of them could be: Showing "strong leadership" after 9/11. Old personal grudge with saddam. Troops on the ground = controll. Scaretactics for iran and north korea. A general (christian?) view of the world in black and white. Saddam was "bad", therefore every means to remove him was ok, but jesus, if every big leader made everything that simple the world would be a total mess?

Voting someone into power to "spite" someone else sounds like a.. uh.. somewhat retarted reason?

Do the majority of the bushvoters even know what the (big parts of the) world thinks of bush? outfoxed presented some interesting statistics on how many foxviewers believed in what everyone else knows was lies by now (WMDs, al-quadi links etc). Maybe they think the world loves bush :).

I bet if I had posted the first reports of US soldiers torturing prisoners inside an Iraq prison you would have called me a moron then too:1orglaugh

You obviously didn't read the thread or you would have seen my response to project_naughty.

LOL, another proof that people don't read threads but try to talk out their ass:1orglaugh

Shit happens ...

What? We can show what we do to them but what they do to us should be hidden? And I've been called an idiot in this thread.:1orglaugh

You should go home and show your team how to fight better because they're getting their raghead asses kicked.

You're talking about the spite of homosexuals, aren't you:winkwink:
LOL, tell "bushvoters" what the outside world thinks and they'll call you (lying) idiot. I think some bushvoters are in this thread:1orglaugh