- developing...................
-
-
Who is Scott Peterson?
-
I'm switching to TV although sometimes GFY is faster than the news...Comment
-
CourtTV is playing re-runs, where are you getting this info?Comment
-
CourtTV - its' the bestOriginally posted by POV Porn guy
I'm switching to TV although sometimes GFY is faster than the news...
Comment
-
No doubt about thatOriginally posted by POV Porn guy
I'm switching to TV although sometimes GFY is faster than the news...Comment
-
Yeah, but they have been playing the same shit all day . . . who knows when the family actually appeared at the courtroom.Originally posted by DeanCapture
CourtTV - its' the best
Think it is a mis-trial?Comment
-
Yea - I think it'll be a mis-trial!Originally posted by baddog
Yeah, but they have been playing the same shit all day . . . who knows when the family actually appeared at the courtroom.
Think it is a mis-trial?
Should know something within the next few minutes.Comment
-
what do you guys think, did he did it or not?
I don't know what to think.PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic
AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online!
TChicks.com | Angeles Cid | Mariana Cordoba | MAILERS WELCOME!Comment
-
I think its quite obvious, to me anyway.Originally posted by pornguy
what do you guys think, did he did it or not?
I don't know what to think.Comment
-
If you're watching CourtTV it's a replay of the events that happened 2 or 3 hours ago when they replaced juror 7.Comment
-
I think he probably did it. How somebody that stupid could not leave any forensic evidence at all amazes me though.Originally posted by pornguy
what do you guys think, did he did it or not?
I don't know what to think.
They should have called in Grisam..Comment
-
I think he did it - but the problem is that all they have is substantial evidence....nothing concrete. No blood, no hair, no fibers of any kind. All they have is what he said to the media and how he acted. Yea - I think he did it but I can see some jurors having a problem with the prosecution not have concrete evidence.Originally posted by pornguy
what do you guys think, did he did it or not?
I don't know what to think.Comment
-
Well if what I'm watching happened 2 or 3 hours ago - we should be able to see something on the news websites by now - I don't see anything???Originally posted by PersianKitty
If you're watching CourtTV it's a replay of the events that happened 2 or 3 hours ago when they replaced juror 7.Comment
-
I'd say at very least it'd be difficult to convict him for murder 1 and give him the death penalty.Originally posted by DeanCapture
I think he did it - but the problem is that all they have is substantial evidence....nothing concrete. No blood, no hair, no fibers of any kind. All they have is what he said to the media and how he acted. Yea - I think he did it but I can see some jurors having a problem with the prosecution not have concrete evidence.
I think you mean circumstantial evidence not substantial.Last edited by WarChild; 11-09-2004, 04:07 PM..Comment
-
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/11/09/pe...ial/index.htmlOriginally posted by DeanCapture
Well if what I'm watching happened 2 or 3 hours ago - we should be able to see something on the news websites by now - I don't see anything???
http://www.courttv.com/trials/peters...04_pm_ctv.htmlComment
-
I knew that a juror had already been replaced - but something else is going on now I think.Originally posted by PersianKitty
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/11/09/pe...ial/index.htmlComment
-
Jurors ended their day at 3:55 pm and leftOriginally posted by DeanCapture
I knew that a juror had already been replaced - but something else is going on now I think.
http://www.courttv.com/trials/peterson/juryblog.htmlComment
-
Well shit - they were talking about mistrials and stuff so I thought (and they thought) a verdict was about to happen.Originally posted by PersianKitty
Jurors ended their day at 3:55 pm and left
http://www.courttv.com/trials/peterson/juryblog.html
FALSE ALARM
Comment
-
yeah, . . . just a re-run . . . . got rid of the juror that would not deliberate, replaced with Strawberry ShortcakeComment
-
The issue isn't did he do it, but did the prosecution prove he did it?Originally posted by pornguy
what do you guys think, did he did it or not?
I don't know what to think.Comment
-
that is the problem with tape delaysOriginally posted by DeanCapture
Well shit - they were talking about mistrials and stuff so I thought (and they thought) a verdict was about to happen.
FALSE ALARM
Comment
-
Haven't followed the case very close, but my opinion is a cheater, a bad lyer, doesn't automatically make you a killer! If he did it...Then I hope he gets the worst ass raping in jail!
Comment
Comment