Bush's foreign policy for the next 4 years
 

Do you think that Bush will keep the exact same line of making decisions against the will of the UN, if necessary? Do you think America will go to another war? who do you think will be attacked? Iran? Syria? both? :Graucho :Graucho :Graucho

Or maybe Bush will try to cease down a little to make America look better in the eyes of "the world"?

Feel free to explain any thoughts you might have on what might happen in the next 4 years :thumbsup

"Do you think that Bush will keep the exact same line of making decisions against the will of the UN, if necessary?"

Was it necessary before?

I don't believe he's going to change the way he works at all. No way.
There will be more wars more death more lies...

Why don't you go after Iran and Syria by yourselfs you litlle bitches?

Because you know they would go Treblinka-style on your asses, thats why. :ak47:

well, the UN was totally against it, so you should give it some credit

Iran represents a clear and present danger to the United States and its allies. Imagine if the US Senate voted a law and then all the US Senators got up and started chanting "Death to a Country".
What would be the word's reaction?
Well, that is what just happened in Iran. The Iranian Senate voted a law that forces the Iranian Government to continue and increase funding on nuclear research. Bad news is that this law was pushed not only by the hardliner (Not a surprise) but also by the "so-called" moderate :(

As far as the UN is concerned, out of 197 Nations, only 65 are democracies, therefore I really doubt GWB will change his stance toward them.

Im just hoping he's going to be more worried about the UN than he'll be about porn!

If anything he will get more bold and brazen. He doesn't have to worry about being re-elected this time around.

The only reason Israel has not anihilated Iran is that there is pressure from the US and Europe to find a diplomatic solution. Isreal will never allow Iran to go full nuke and will take them out before they do so.

As far as Syria is concerned, you must realize that they are
almost bankrupt and out of commission.

As for your nazi remarks, if I were you, being a nice and proud Turk, I would strongly think about what your country has done to the Armenians.

In a speech responding to critics of the invasion, Hitler said, "Certain foreign newspapers have said that we fell on Austria with brutal methods. I can only say; even in death they cannot stop lying. I have in the course of my political struggle won much love from my people, but when I crossed the former frontier [into Austria] there met me such a stream of love as I have never experienced. Not as tyrants have we come, but as liberators."

?The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the TRUTH becomes the greatest ENEMY OF THE STATE.?

? Dr. Joseph M. Goebbels - Hitler's propaganda minister

It is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country. --Reichsmarschall Hermann Goering

More WMD shipments from the US to Israel.

Endless "peace keeping"(aka massmurder) in Iraq.

If Iran slips up and does anything to indicate they're supporting the rebels, giving GW an excuse (or maybe he'll just make more shit up) we may end up with a war we'll need a draft to fight.

Iran may even be willing to detonate a nuke on Iraqi land*, (tho perhaps by proxy) as neither the US nor Israel are likely to use nukes themselves unless the attack was on their own resepective homelands. Though can you imagine how much of our military could be wiped out if they're crowded into one city like fallujah? or the Baghdad 'green zone'? :eek2 It's quite an opportunity for the "Death To America" regime.

Iran doesn't really give a shit about the Iraqi people (after their war w/ them); they would just like more influence over the land/oil.




*this assume Iran has/gets nukes. (we're going to be there a long time) How close they are seems unclear at this point. I wouldn't put it past North Korea to just sell them one. Then they get to hit us for free and basically get away with it. All kinds of nasty possibilities... Nobody trusts Bush. Almost approaching a second cold war.