Ohio official: Count could take 11 days
 

Final results also delayed in New Mexico, Iowa

(CNN) -- Just as it was four years earlier, the 2004 presidential vote couldn't be settled on Election Night.

Sen. John Kerry's campaign refused to concede early Wednesday, arguing that more than 250,000 provisional and absentee ballots remained to be counted in the key battleground state of Ohio.

cnn

yep.....gonna be a while and alot of shit to sort through before we know who won.

this is gonna be fun.

not again

americans are fucking crazy

Im no expert and am only repeating what they are saying on the U.K telly, but with the remaining votes in Ohio and the lead Bush has there, wouldnt Kerry have to get 12 out of every 13 votes out of the remaining ballot to win?

If thats the case it looks like its all over, even the Democrats are talking about when Kerry should concede, looks like its all over, the nutter is back in :(

11 days to beging counting and even longer while counting

yep but it seems ohio is going to bush.. DAMN

:Graucho :Graucho :Graucho

because theres alot of legal bullshit they gotta handle, the max days they're allowed is 11 days.

voting machine "glitches", missing votes, military votes not counted (yet), etc etc.

They're bringing in the lawyers and all. Its going to be an interesting 2 weeks....especially because of that Fucktard Bush already declared himself the winner of Ohio (well, not him, someone who works for him, so Bush can always blame that on someone else.....typical republican.)
:2 cents:

better get used to it, Bush is president again.

you never know.

i find it odd that Bush went ahead and declared himself the winner, after every news channel stayed clear of saying anything like that.

then to have all this fishy stuff happen, again, in Florida and Ohio with "glitches" of voting machines.

something doesnt seem right........

Many polls were giving Bush ahead the last days. It's in your best interest to accept that Kerry did the best to secure the result is accurate and that his opponent didn't steal the elections. The opposite assumption can be proved really dangerous.