GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   killing animals for art? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=379428)

SilverTab 10-29-2004 11:25 AM

killing animals for art?
 
http://www.wetterlinggallery.com/arc...halia_main.htm

sorry if it was posted already....

apparently this girl kill the animals 15 minutes prior to the photoshots..it's real, no photoshop....

what do you think about it? apparently she's making a statement...

Missy 10-29-2004 12:22 PM

As far as her "art" is concerned, I don't think anybody really has a right to judge what does and does not constitute art. The fact that she uses dead animals does not make it any less of a work of art, in my opinion. Most artists strive to evoke emotion and sometimes controversy, so if that was a goal of hers, she's definitely accomplished it. If these pieces of art had been just digitally enhanced photographs, people would call them beautiful and forget about them. She definitely wouldn't have received all of this attention and notoriety had they not been real.

Now as to my personal opinion of her art, I think it's disgusting and horrific! I could never find beauty in death or carcasses. The only statement it makes to me is how heartless and pitiless some people can be when it comes to their own personal gain. According to some articles I read, the only law she's breaking is the one that says she must have a veterinarian present when she kills the animals. Although I don't think she should be locked away as some people suggest, I also wouldn't hang a piece of that "art" on my wall if you paid me.


Interesting article about her gallery

The Heron 10-29-2004 12:26 PM

I kill animals for fun, so killing for art makes no difference to me.
However I do think artists are a goofy bunch (my father being one) they do shit just because they feel like it then morons who don't know anything call it "great works of art". oh well

TonyL 10-29-2004 12:31 PM

Taking a life in the name of art. Pretty messed up IMHO. :(

Manowar 10-29-2004 12:33 PM

thats pretty damn sick

SilverTab 10-29-2004 12:36 PM

here's an example of her work so people see what it's all about..

http://www.wetterlinggallery.com/bil...halia/Star.jpg

"Wetterling said the work was meant to symbolise the five stars of the former Soviet Union, which he said was responsible for the murder of Edenmont's mother when the artist was only 14."

Basic_man 10-29-2004 12:38 PM

Sick.. so sick :(

Gynecologist 10-29-2004 12:40 PM

Don't worry. Some person who loves animals will eventually find her and do the same to her that she has done to these animals.

If I had the chance I would at least slap that evil c_u_n_t a few times.

Libertine 10-29-2004 12:40 PM

Millions of animals are killed for food each day. Killing a few for art certainly is no worse than that. And no, humans do no need to eat meat, so killing animals for food is not necessary.

As for her "art", she's a fucking hack with no talent whatsoever. Shocking is easy, and does not constitute art. It's nothing but a desperate attempt to turn the combination of having a total lack of talent and being a pathetic attention whore into fame. Not only is she nothing but a bad parody of an artist, she's a fucking leech and should be shot for destroying the very concept of art by means of utter incompetence.

TheMob 10-29-2004 12:41 PM

that is just retarded. sad, really.

sweet7 10-29-2004 12:43 PM

I don't agree with this at all, what kind of statement is she trying to make?

emthree 10-29-2004 12:44 PM

http://www.swapmeetdave.com/Humor/Cats/Retard.jpg

BuckLover 10-29-2004 12:47 PM

Sick!:mad:

TheMob 10-29-2004 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sweet7
I don't agree with this at all, what kind of statement is she trying to make?
I don't know. Maybe she's not making one, she's just trying to catch her 15 minutes of controversial bullshit eyeball time. I mean, the subject matter is so intense that the art itself is lost, that is not art.

Rob 10-29-2004 12:50 PM

FUCKING HORRIBLE AND TOTALLY DEVOID OF TASTE!!! :mad:

M_M 10-29-2004 12:53 PM

OMG!! Why would you kill a cat?!! omg omg

cats are cute. it's not ok to kill cute animals.

i love steak, but i mean, i dont kill the animal you know, and cows are ugly, you see?

so don't kill cats plz, OMG

kthxbye

KRL 10-29-2004 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The Heron
I kill animals for fun, so killing for art makes no difference to me.
:ak47: :ak47: :ak47: :ak47: :ak47:

Missy 10-29-2004 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sweet7
I don't agree with this at all, what kind of statement is she trying to make?
I think you just answered your own question.

Hey You . . . I Know You! 10-29-2004 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by TonyL
Taking a life in the name of art. Pretty messed up IMHO. :(

But . . .

Everyone would agree that if someone killed "boobmaster" to create art, it would certainly be acceptable!

I just took a poll and 100% said, "kill boobmaster and hang his lifeless body from a third floor window.

This work of art will be "interactive" because the audience will be invited to throw rocks, eggs and human excrement at boobmaster's body as it hangs.

xclusive 10-29-2004 12:56 PM

What a fucking loser...:321GFY

mahoney 10-29-2004 12:57 PM

i would pay $1,000,000 for it :1orglaugh

Deepai 10-29-2004 12:57 PM

mmmmm pussy.

Strife 10-29-2004 01:02 PM

I'm all for art but this is going too far...fucking sick. Bitch should be locked up.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123