![]() |
Is there any reason to get a flat screen monitor
besides saving space? You just save a couple of inches of space with it right? Is the picture quality better than a CRT?
|
Depends on the model as far as picture cuality goes but it's a marketing ploy and keeping up with the hendersons kind of thing...
|
I thought CTR is supposed to be better quality image?
|
my eyes do hurt when i look at the screen too long, but I dont know if it's going to be better for my eyes to use a flat screen.
|
|
The moment you replace your two 19 inch monitors with flat screens, you rediscover your desk, and all that extra real estate that goes with it.
|
yeah flat screens save up space and they're pretty nifty to look at too
|
A glass CRT typically has better resolution and is easier on the eyes. Much better for doing graphics. Let's make that resolution per dollar spent.
I have an NEC Diamondtron and am happy. Wouldn't trade it in on an LCD. Fuck the desk space. |
CRT is better for looking a numbers and text too. Take a close look at a cheap LCD and you'll see what I mean.
|
I think refresh on a CRT is alot more noticealble and eye straining then a flat panel...
I can go 20 hours no problem with my 20" dell flat panel... my sony 19" crt would make me look like I was stoned |
its easier to move around than a bulky monitor especially when u have to move.
Also just looks cooler on your desk :thumbsup |
the colours on my flat screen seem to be more vibrant
|
Quote:
Idea! Turn up the refresh rate on the CRT to 75Hz. |
LCD flat screens blow away CRT's. Everything is much more vibrant and 3d looking. Better color saturation. Sharper text.
I can't even look at CRT's now. I've tossed mine all in the junk pile. The new Sony's with XBrite technology do a drop dead gorgeous image. Personally I'm a huge fan of Envision Monitors. They are priced well and just look really great in side by side comparisons. Also, Samsung and NEC are top of the line. |
I'm a fan of flat screen LCD. My eyes never hurt, there is no flicker and they save a hell of a lot of space. Besides that, everything is much sharper.
|
Quote:
If those are your designs from your profile, you do have some talent!!!!! I've booked marked the site. May hit ya on ICQ. |
Quote:
I've worked with both. Exceptions as always. If you spend enough money on that LCD... |
60hz will give you a headache in no time.
CRT has a better picture, especially for gaming. Flat panel monitor is better for space saving. Quote:
|
Agree Turbo!
The LCDs are catching up Took a look at Sony's XBright after KRL posted. I find that he typically knows what he is talking about.... The Sony LCd had: Maximum non-interlaced resolution: 1280 x 1024 and the other specs were not bad either. My NEC CRT still has more display resolution. I currently work at 1280 x 1024 on my aging FP912. That would be max out for the Sony. |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123