![]() |
To Xpays...
... lol chill dude
haha I have been away for a couple of hours because a couple of friends invited me to watch a champions league game... I'm not 24/7 on GFY. In minute 1 you post: "what is your account number trax?" only 3 minutes later in the same thread you post: "I smell bullshit" and 6 minutes later this thing gets its own thread C'mon .... gimme some time :winkwink: now the details: 1) "are you with extremepay trax?" No - they just bought my sig the last couple of months and got some nice exposure for their money just from this fake drama hehe :) 2) "except it is malicious to post webalizer stats, no actual XPays stats, and fail to write in to our support for assistance." I can have anyone verify those stats within 2 mins. as far as the support goes... there is nothing a support could do simply because the surfer is being sent directly to the tour page. (but you know that now already). 3) This made me sad :( :"Trax's post here lacks professional courtesy and class" "the "guy" deserves no courtesy whatsoever- which is the same amount the guy showed XPays." "The guy posted on a public board stats that slammed their program" "Trax waived his ref url privacy and the list of url's I posted was meant as Proof to my explanation. It is justifiable under the circumstances." :waaaaahh No - seriously: I have to say that I do not really care about you posting the ref urls... the site I promote you guys with honestly has ZERO worth to me... I've made my money off Paris Hilton already - believe me. Apart from that I think you are reacting a little bit pathic. First of all I didn't slam your program (I know it was not you Evan who posted the quoted text) - just because I said it's my worst converting sponsor and can't convert my traffic for shit? Now a last thing about the so called "bad google images traffic". I've got a lot of VERY nice traffic spots in all kinds of niches on google iimages and I've always converted very well with it. Here is an example from Wegcash: http://www.mindblowingporn.com/3.gif Do bitch about me not liking Xpays... I can live with that :) But do not come here and bitch about me & my traffic cuz you got no clue about either one :glugglug Oh I nearly forgot two things. First of all feel sorry for wasting ten minutes to write this and I am a little bit disappointed of jonathan. That's it for now lol. I hope you guys enjoyed this fake drama. It just increased my sig value hehe. |
and thanks to the many people who contacted me on ICQ to let me know of the 2nd thread hehe.
Appreciated |
Quote:
WG |
Quote:
:1orglaugh |
You brought it to the boards right off the bat. I posted many stats screenshots disproving the generic nature of your post. Your traffic is not bad and not great- the XPays webmasters who work the search engines are having better results than you across the board.
http://www.evanradio.com/picslink/stat1.jpg |
|
Oh and the thing with me being disappointed with J is "fixed", too.
He's a cool guy and did nothing wrong. Evan just made it sound completly different :winkwink: See you in Vegas... I owe you a drink hehe |
|
onwards and upwards- hopefully there will be balance going forward. I apologize if I upset you or J or anyone.
|
Quote:
Post more stats and enjoy the free advertising possibility. Oh and I feel like saying one more bad thing about XPays... Your guys stats are... a)... fucking ugly & b)... fucking useless You could at least put up some traffic summary report and a few other basic things. Again this is just my :2 cents: No bashing :) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Trax you should have said that it was google image traffic, you made it sound like it was direct search traffic. Huge difference. You're basically sending blind traffic that isn't expecting to see a pay site. :2 cents:
|
Quote:
|
xpays, did you get my email about 1click cross-sales?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
damn thats some nice stats from google images traffic
|
Quote:
If done right there is no difference between images search and "normal" SE traffic. The visitor gets forwarded DIRECTLY to the paysite (its cloaked on that domain) and sees what he was searching for: paris hilton I've done so many amazing things with images traffic that I can not complain about it at all... It's a lot of porn surfers who did not find the porn they were looking for. But I won't comment further on that! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Dont know what the fuck you are talking about , but you got the wrong person ;) If you have some proof of that, post them ;) It semm you are the one who used proxy and got sued by M$ , not me. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I'm not standing up for xpays or saying that they do convert, I don't use them. I'm just pointing out that you can't expect image traffic to convert like regular search traffic.
|
Quote:
but in my case he is clicking on a thumbnail of screenshot of the paris hilton sex tape which makes a slight difference :winkwink: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You said that in 2 threads. Where are the proofs? ;) When you will do a search, you will notice its not me, but a dumbass with a similar nick who said that. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Alls I'm saying is it would have been appropriate to mention in your first post. If I hear a sponsor is converting real search traffic @ 0:7000 I never touch them. Anyway. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
interesting excerpt from the parallel thread imho:
"quote:Originally posted by MetaformX Interesting thread, to say the least...Bring up some privacy issues... " Post Proof vs. Privacy would be an interesting thread to start imho. I think I walked the tightrope ok this time despite what other may think. Also, XPays respects privacy historically, in the present, and the future. An example that comes to mind immediately is the fact that we guarded our affiliate database successfully in Microsoft vs. XPays. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123