| sexeducation |
10-17-2004 11:27 AM |
Quote:
Originally posted by murray_dawg
I want to point out how much further this proves Lensman does not moderate GFY.
He didn't even read half the emails we sent asking for PEDO to be banned.
Lensman: Sexeducation had nude children on his pages, Search engine optimized for underage keywords.
Why can't we prove it? Because we didn't save CP on our computer a year ago so we could prove this today.
We ALL saw about 6 CP pics on his pages. You banned "Masterblogger" for posting CP. He's the SAME FUCKING GUY.
But you're too retarded to see this, and instead ban people who have use here and drum up business, such as Reak and myself.
He's a known pedophile. It seems like YOU are the only one who can't see this. What's your fucking problem? Oh, who cares you won't even ever see this thread.
|
SexEducation.com did have "nude censored" graphics of minors, and in hind sight that may have been a mistake. However, while I am the current owner currently ONLY 2257 compliant graphics will be used. I would predict though that the new owners (you can't afford my domains) will once again put nude graphics of minors on the site; for example changing a diaper, breast feeding, the growth of teenagers boobs, etc all valid topics for the domain SexEducation.com and the exploration of sex and sexuality.
SexEducation.com has NEVER had child pornography on it's website - it did however have an example of a Russian advertisment for the same.
You are a known liar and legal liability to this board!
You can not call someone a "known pedophile" on any board anywhere - UNLESS TRUE - without causing a legal liability situation.
Now PROVE I am a known pedophile or be banned again big mouth.
PROVE YOUR STATEMENT "KNOWN PEDOPHILE"!!!! |
