Edwards mis-spoke . . .
 

he said Saddam was surrounded in Afghanistan, when he meant to say Osama . . . . how come you anti-Bush people aren't commenting on that?

I know if Bush or Cheney said that, you would be all over them

Because this rarely happens to Edwards or Kerry. However it is the norm for Bush.

I cannot even bring myself to listen to that idiot talk anymore.

He caught himself and corrected it, I can't believe you made a post about this..

How do you know Saddam wasn't in Afghanistan?

Were ya there?:winkwink:

because he did it once. in a live debate.

freudian slip.



cheney did it three times on one speech.


bush does it constantly.

just pointing out a fact

do you have any idea what a Freudian slip is? didn't think so

let us pray that whoever win on this election can lead the country for good:)

Ok you busted me. no i don't.


but i do know that bush is a major fucking demon and needs to be ousted before he fucks this country up for good.

nope actually i said it right. it meant what i thought it did.

you think he believed that Saddam was cornered/surrounded in Afghanistan?

I can only hope you are wrong about that

no what i think is that subconsciously he still percieves a connection between iraq and al-qaeda.

belief, thought, or emotion ... you know he's reminding himself over and over ...

"Point out that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11, point out that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11" .. iraq, afghanistan, saddam ... lotsa thoughts to creep in on him.

-p

Because Kerry/Edwards havent been going around the country for the past 3 years insinuating Saddam had something to do with 9/11 in order to gain support to invade a country. Are you that fucking stupid?

cause we're having too much fun with factcheck.com :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

i get a quote everyday from someone who hates bush

the guy says stupid shit everyday..it is unreal
i thought this was a great one..i mean what a baffoon


September 30: "What I am against is quotas. I am against hard quotas, quotas they basically delineate based upon whatever. However they delineate, quotas, I think, vulcanize society. So I don't know how that fits into what everybody else is saying, their relative positions, but that's my position."


this months
October 1: "I can't tell you how good of folks they are, not only in terms of the job they'll have, but just in the quality of character."


October 2/3: "I want everybody to hear loud and clear that I'm going to be the president of everybody."



October 4: "I would have to ask the questioner. I haven't had a chance to ask the questioners the question they've been questioning. On the other hand, I firmly believe she'll be a fine secretary of labor. And I've got confidence in Linda Chavez. She is a--she'll bring an interesting perspective to the Labor Department."

Edwards fucked up his speech several times tonight. Mispronounced words, Running 2 sentences together, Not getting names right etc.... If you didn't see him doing any of this, then you need to rewatch it when they air it later on.

Did you even read his post? He was clearly talking about the definition of freudian slip that he had quoted. I notice you do this kind of thing a lot. You should probably start reading each post a good 2 or 3 times before you actually reply to it.