So, Kerry said he would go after N. Korea . . .
 

and Bush said we will maintain an all volunteer Army

What do you think?

The day Kerry would do anything against NK is the day I give you a lap dance.

are you trying to get the swing vote to Kerry?

do you still believe anything that comes out of Bush's mouth? We should have went after North Korea in the first place. That dictatorship puts Saddam's Human Rights violations to shame.

We will see if there is a volunteer Army affter march 15th....:glugglug

kinda scary knowing nk has nuclear wepason that they can fire at us at any time...

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

I think if Bush wins the draft will go back into effect.

Of course he is, they both are.

Are you silly N Korea has no oil lol

what do you call going after ? he only said he wanted to talk with them directly

North Korea BAD.

Lap dancing GOOD.

Baddog for Prez! :1orglaugh

why is that? what is to be gained by that? Kerry is the only one that would bring back the draft :2 cents:

Kerry said he would negotiate with N. Korea... not attack them. If the states attacked N.Korea right now they'd get fucked. North Korea is the 5th largest military on earth and they're fully functional.

There are reasons nobody is touching NK. Many reasons.

Think about it for a minute and then slap yourself for being so silly.

Who is NK friends with? Ok. Now which one of our friends is near NK? Ok.

Commence slapping.

that is what he said at the end, did you listen from the beginning?

is there a transcript up yet?

Agreed.

excuse me if I've heard that "largest military" thing before e.g Iraq being the 4th largest in the first war, they also said U.S couldn't take afghanistan because Russia couldn't etc.

Funny how those both worked out.

It makes me want to fuck the fattest chick i can find :banana :banana

sure did listen from the beginning , he never once said he wanted to attack

he said BILATTERAL talks !!

he implied that he would have gone to N Korea instead of Iraq

Yes, but he didn't exactly say he would march in now. He said he would have done that "instead", which is complete bull shit, he wouldn't have.

If the human rights violations that N.K. is doing was brought to the public eye. China would be pressured by the rest of the world to step in line against NK. North Korea is extremely poor and is probably very close to collapsing in the next 10-20 years. But the issue at hand is they now probably now have nukes.

The reports and videos I've seen from inside North Korea almost rival that of what happened in Nazi Germany Death camps. But then again look at the Sudan and half the countries in Africa they are almost as bad. Seems the worls dosen't care unless there is a profit in it somewhere.

North Korea DOES NOT have Nuclear weapons that could reach us. They do not own any long range ballistic missles capable of dropping a nuclear payload anywhere near American soil. They have nukes but no way to deliver them so why would they be an immediate threat to the U.S.?

If we attach North Korea we piss off China and China is the one country we don't want to fuck with. It's really that simple.

Sorry wrong they did a test they could hit LA , where Saddam had nothing to hit us at all never mind nothing nuclear.

can you give your sources about N Korea NOT having nukes that can reach mainland ?

Seeing as how Kerry would put more troops in Iraq if he was elected, I highly doubt it

Kerry never said he'd go after North Korea. He said he'd have bilateral talks.

I think North Korea can be settled through Dialog they are broke as fuck.

of course he didn't