2001 footage of Colin and Condi "No WMD"
 

Why do American news organizations completely ignore this?

http://www.bi30archive.org/extras/Po..._no_threat.asx

You answered your own question. They are in America. how hard would it be for the givernment to pull all of their licenses??

Proof that the government lied, and nobody cares.

Not just "wrong". Not just "misleading". Lying. Proof. On television.

Just like Clinton bombed Iraq because it was a great threat, suddenly it was defeated when Bush wanted to....

Just like "I voted for the 87 billion, right before I voted against the 87 billion."

It's all the same, all levels of government do it on either side of the aisle in this country, or any other country.

The government's mission statement is the same as religion: "Entertain the masses to keep their eyes away from our hands in their pockets"

:karaoke

vote vote vote

I suggest everybody call, or email, their local news stations and newspapers and ask them why this footage has been buried since Bush took us to war. It's proof that this administration knowingly lied to the world. If they can air this in the UK, why not America?

I've seen Bush supporters on this board argue that "It's not Bush's fault. Everybody thought he had these weapons." Well, in 2001 our Secrety Of State did not believe this. Nor our National Security Advisor.

Were they lying before? and then suddenly started telling the 'truth' after 9/11? .. only to later be proved wrong... that their original 'lie' was actually true.. is that what you want to believe?

Just if you show a nipple... that is so dangerous...

Never heard of a nip killing 1000+ soldiers...

America has been highjacked by a bunch of religious totalitarian neo-conservatives . Population is proud that the US " kicked ass" in Iraq .... :1orglaugh

I've said it many times, it goes both ways. Here is a dose of your own medicine, call your local news agencies:

"In fact, during President Clinton's eight years in office, there were at least two official pronouncements of an alarming alliance between Baghdad and al Qaeda. One came from William S. Cohen, Mr. Clinton's defense secretary. He cited an al Qaeda-Baghdad link to justify the bombing of a pharmaceutical plant in Sudan."

"The 1998 indictment said: "Al Qaeda also forged alliances with the National Islamic Front in the Sudan and with the government of Iran and its associated terrorist group Hezbollah for the purpose of working together against their perceived common enemies in the West, particularly the United States. In addition, al Qaeda reached an understanding with the government of Iraq that al Qaeda would not work against that government and that on particular projects, specifically including weapons development, al Qaeda would work cooperatively with the government of Iraq." "

"Shortly after the embassy bombings, Mr. Clinton ordered air strikes on al Qaeda training camps in Afghanistan and on the Shifa pharmaceutical factory in Sudan. "

http://www.washtimes.com/national/20...2921-3401r.htm

That's just one reason, but let's get to the subject at hand:

"Earlier today, I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors. "

"Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons. "

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stori...s/clinton.html

How come you have forgotten this came out, conveniently around the impeachment proceedings. And yes, those are CLINTON's words. I guess Saddam just buried it all in the sand to never be found....

To put it in your words: "Democrats were telling lies until Republicans took action on it, then started telling the 'truth' ?"

Do you EVER stop talking shit? Your tape proves NOTHING. Your implication that the mainstream media is 'intentionally' ignoring the truth is laughable. The fucking NY Times would NEVER ignore a story that could hurt the president. Keep talking shit and I just might donate another grand to the republican party in your name.

The Clinton administration is not in charge anymore.

Stop avoiding a simple question:

Explain why Colin Powell said "He has not developed any significant capability with respect to weapons of mass destruction" (6 months before 9/11) and then later (while bush was attempting to justify an unprovoked attack) testified to us and the UN that he did have these weapons. (that the boogeyman Saddam might drop nukes on us from unmanned drones)