GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   ATTN: God.....I would like you to implement the following change. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=353584)

AaronM 09-08-2004 12:26 PM

ATTN: God.....I would like you to implement the following change.
 
Women should have a set of titties on their back.

Two reasons for this:

1: It will be more difficult for them to catch us staring at their tits.

2: When fucking doggy style, it will be easier to grab their tits and head for the home stretch.


Thank you for considering my suggestion. Should you choose to implement it, I would like to receive full credit for the idea.

Respectfully submitted,

AaronM

TurboAngel 09-08-2004 12:26 PM

LMFAO!


:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Deepai 09-08-2004 12:27 PM

done. and done.

Trixxxia 09-08-2004 12:28 PM

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh Good suggestions!

The Truth Hurts 09-08-2004 12:28 PM

it would also make slow dancing much more interesting.

StuartD 09-08-2004 12:29 PM

It also makes slow dancing with them MUCH more enjoyable :thumbsup

edit: dammit, beat me by miliseconds

dennisthemenace 09-08-2004 12:30 PM

:1orglaugh


and it would benefit them by balancing their weight, helping back problems :)

Manowar 09-08-2004 12:32 PM

:1orglaugh

AaronM 09-08-2004 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dennisthemenace
:1orglaugh


and it would benefit them by balancing their weight, helping back problems :)


Yep...It's all about evolution. :glugglug

mardigras 09-08-2004 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dennisthemenace
:1orglaugh


and it would benefit them by balancing their weight, helping back problems :)

Dolly Parton would be 3 1/2 feet tall:glugglug

dennisthemenace 09-08-2004 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by AaronM
Yep...It's all about evolution. :glugglug

Yessss.. you sir, are a genius :thumbsup


Quote:

Originally posted by mardigras
Dolly Parton would be 3 1/2 feet tall:glugglug
Isn't she already?

Serge Litehead 09-08-2004 12:39 PM

please donate another rib.

tranza 09-08-2004 01:04 PM

Good idea!!

:thumbsup

SPWGuru 09-08-2004 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by AaronM


2: When fucking doggy style, it will be easier to grab their tits and head for the home stretch.


Thats what hair is for.

Zoe_Zoebaboe 09-08-2004 01:57 PM

Makes ballroom dancing a popular pasttime? ;)

AaronM 09-08-2004 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SpwGuru
Thats what hair is for.
WTF do I know about hair?

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE 09-08-2004 02:00 PM

Patent filed.

Rob 09-08-2004 02:14 PM

When I'm talking to God through my porcelin portal, I'll be sure to pass on the request. :thumbsup :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Doctor Dre 09-08-2004 02:48 PM

I'm currently discussing the idea with god

Nylz 09-08-2004 03:34 PM

HAHA

good one :)

CET 09-08-2004 03:43 PM

I'd also like god to add a second dick to the middle of my stomach. That way I can fuck two chicks at the same time while they're smoochin it up.

alexg 09-08-2004 03:46 PM

good suggestion, although it would take me some time to get used to that..
in the beginning I will just think women are weird..

oh wait, they're weird already, so what the hell.... it can be done asap :1orglaugh

SPWGuru 09-08-2004 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by AaronM
WTF do I know about hair?
I know your bald head doesn't have any but I would hope you aren't fucking bald chicks.

sumphatpimp 09-08-2004 04:25 PM

I am busy at the moment but I will take it into consideration

http://snopes.com/photos/natural/graphics/godhands.jpg

boobmaster 09-08-2004 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by AaronM
Women should have a set of titties on their back.

Two reasons for this:

1: It will be more difficult for them to catch us staring at their tits.

2: When fucking doggy style, it will be easier to grab their tits and head for the home stretch.


Thank you for considering my suggestion. Should you choose to implement it, I would like to receive full credit for the idea.

Respectfully submitted,

AaronM

Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain

OzMan 09-08-2004 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sumphatpimp
I am busy at the moment but I will take it into consideration

http://snopes.com/photos/natural/graphics/godhands.jpg

That pic is fake.
God doesn't have thumbs.
He doesn't need to grip anything.
He just waves and points and stuff gets created

:glugglug

AaronM 09-08-2004 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SpwGuru
I know your bald head doesn't have any but I would hope you aren't fucking bald chicks.
You got a problem with bald chicks? It's all the rage where I come from.

jwerd 09-08-2004 04:33 PM

damn aaron, good idea!

boobmaster 09-08-2004 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by AaronM
You got a problem with bald chicks? It's all the rage where I come from.
Bald is fine. As long as they have big tits.

mrgica 09-08-2004 04:45 PM

Ok you are not the first one to ask for this, I will seriously consider that now. Thanks.

MrIzzz 09-08-2004 04:48 PM

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh


and i pray to the lord that i have the opportunity to stain aaron's sheets one day:thumbsup

baddog 09-08-2004 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by boobmaster
Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain
when did he? do you even know what that means?

baddog 09-08-2004 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by OzMan
That pic is fake.

really?

OzMan 09-08-2004 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by baddog
really?
yes , really.

It's all about the opposing thumbs, even a monkey knows that.

mrgica 09-08-2004 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by OzMan
yes , really.

It's all about the opposing thumbs, even a monkey knows that.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh
GFY shod have "morons of the year posts" section

This would be the winner so far this year i think.

baddog 09-08-2004 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by mrgica
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh
GFY shod have "morons of the year posts" section

This would be the winner so far this year i think.

if you are referring to your contribution, it could be a contender.

Rankings 09-08-2004 05:30 PM

They should have them both places...the more the better

JSA Matt 09-08-2004 05:31 PM

http://www.tshirthell.com/shirts/products/a348/a348.gif

boobmaster 09-08-2004 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by baddog
when did he? do you even know what that means?
Yes, I do know actually. I think I know where you're going with this. It has nothing to do with swearing, if that's what you're thinking - VERY COMMON misconception. It means do not use the name of God in an irreverent or disrespectful manner.

OzMan 09-08-2004 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by baddog
if you are referring to your contribution, it could be a contender.
:thumbsup

AaronM 09-08-2004 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by boobmaster
Yes, I do know actually. I think I know where you're going with this. It has nothing to do with swearing, if that's what you're thinking - VERY COMMON misconception. It means do not use the name of God in an irreverent or disrespectful manner.
How come people don't bitch when I talk shit about Santa or the Tooth Fairy?

I've seen Santa at the mall...Never seen God. :glugglug

gornyhuy 09-08-2004 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by boobmaster
Yes, I do know actually. I think I know where you're going with this. It has nothing to do with swearing, if that's what you're thinking - VERY COMMON misconception. It means do not use the name of God in an irreverent or disrespectful manner.
So, the creator's name is "God" ?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123