If you run non nude teen sites...
 

you should die a slow and painful death. Scum like you is why the world sucks today.

Those be some hot colors in y0 banner s0n.

Why do you say that?

you agree with 13-17 yr old girls being posed in sexy positions with clothes on? what do yout hink the surfer is thinking when he is signing up?

I bet he is thinking about his neighbors daughter and how much he wants to rape her.

Of course not..Not all non nude sites are like that at all..It's more of a tease more than anything.

Yes a 18 yr old girl in undies is bad bad bad.

A 18 yr old girl should at least be getting a double anal by 2 black guys.

Moron.

95% of the nonnude sites out there are 18+

You have no clue what youre talking about.

Go fight some real cp or something.

I think you should have specified in your opening post.

There are lots of non-nude teen sites out there like Tiffany Teen, Next Door Nikki, Peachez18 etc. where the girl is legal.

But with that said, non-nude underage sites are almost just as disgusting as full out CP. It's still adults taking advantage of children. So I agree with your belief that they should die a slow painful death.

Damn, you are as dumb as you are ugly

actually non nude teen sites (over 18 of course) convert much better than any regular nude teen sites

i am talking about the sites that are 14-17.

what about my post did you not read or understand?

you fucking moron.

Now if you would open your eyes and stop being a retard youd open a couple of nonnude paysites instead.

There are tons of people who push nonnude sites and theyre all revshare. Theres basically no pps nonnude sites out there. I bet it would do really well.

and you like little kids.

sorry, im not into kiddie porn.

List shitstain, you just said nonnude sites are bad. Nonnude and underaged are 2 completely different things. Why didnt you just make a thread saying "if you run underaged sites you are blah blah" Once again you have no clue what youre talking about.

Fuck are you really this retarded or just fooling around? Please tell me youre just messing around?

Ok everybody listen to pimpdog. A girl in clothes is cp, only girls who are naked are legal.

If it's legal leave it alone. The Us Goverment wants us all to argue and take each other out.

If you don't like it don't look at it. It's rather simple really

if she is under 18 its sick. i guess you like them young

Retard, what does this have to do with nonnude? Theres so much more cp NUDE out there then there is underaged girls in thongs. What the fuck are you saying? Clueless idiot.

Marketing?:thumbsup

so you agree with 15 yr old girls posed in sexy positions. ok cool.

Not only you know you are wrong and i pointed it out, instead of admitting it youre gonna post lame replies.

Pathetic.

You can feel the love in this thread.

its ok man, you are just as sick and twisted as i thought you were. and you proved me right today. I dont see anyone jumping to your defense

Yeah, pretty exciting read.

Lol .... I showed this thread to all the guys in the office and we are all lauging at you pimpdog. :) :) :) You sure know how to market to idiots. ;)

its pretty sad to see grown men get so worked up...

bunch of little sissys.. i bet battuss is steaming right now.. and that pedo joesho is just red in the face

Dude once again you have no clue. I was eating a big fat steak and the last thing that was on my mind was you. Please dont think too much of yourself.

who used to own lolitateen.tv?

Well non-nude (18+) is a very profitable 'niche'.

You should try it in your 'program' :Graucho

Anyhow, got work to do. nice chatting and all. :)

im guessing you did at one point?

Somehow I agree with almost every post in this thread, yet I keep getting the distinct impression they're all disagreeing with each other.

Girls under 18, whether nude or not, posing sexually = bad.
Girls over 18, whether nude or not, posing sexually = fine.

I understood from the onset that PD was referring to underage girls... sometimes you can understand what somebody means by using contextual clues.

I get naked :Graucho

not quite but I know who did. sadly, you don't. with a little intelligence, you wouldn';t look so silly.

ask me how much i care about what someone else owned? if i didnt own it i really dont care. I wonder what the content of the site was... or are you just focusing on the domain rather than its substance?

I own irapemydog.com and it has pictures of the ocean and sunsets and candy.


weird huh

Actually some of them look older ... and 13-17 teen sites don't get processed much since the new laws any fucking way

I can actually smell it, smells like bullshit.. :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

i agree, someone needs to make a good non nude pps site

Just a question for everyone on this thread....pimpdog in particular.....what do you think about sites that have girls that are over 18, but are dressed up as little girls, pig tails and all, to look like they are 14 years old. They are totally sexually explicit and are meant to fool the surfer into thinking that the girls are underage.

These sites are ALL OVER the place.......opinions?

www.nngalleries.com

what is wrong with that?

I really am interested in answers to this question.....What do YOU think about this pimpdogg?

the traffic is too damn good ;-)
and you posting that here will let people in on the secret ;-)

how much you care?
no, son. again comes down to how much you know (very little)
if you knew, you would be able to chase away all your detractors in this thread. as usual, you're not bright enough.:1orglaugh

There are a hell of alot of TGP's with big numbers of traffic that make a ton of money off NN sites.
Also, I just like hot chicks more than double anal pics, so I like 18+ girls in a tight tops than a milf fisting her mitt. So what? When you have been with alot of girls, seen alot of porn, you like hot chicks peroid. If they are over 18 that is, she could be 30 for all I care. Some and or most chicks i've seen are the web look better dressed!

Simply put, p1mpdogg doesn't know what he's talking about.

His statement about all 'non nude teen sites' is wildly generalized and for the most part, does not reflect reality.

We all know what he means... he's talking about the sites that sexualize ACTUAL underage girls... and we've probably all seen them at one point or another. These sites should be shut down because they are immoral and border on being illegal. For the most part, new policies and laws are making it more and more difficult for these sites to operate.


Obviously, very little brain power was put into his initial post, which lead to the major generalization of an entire niche. Now all he can do is sit and flame people because he's simply wrong and has no other option other than admitting he was wrong -- which apparently he won't do.

Fact: the majority of the non nude niche is legal, and 18+

I don't think there is anything else to say. You guys are basically arguing over the interpretation of what he meant by "non nude teen sites"

like lightspeed?

i think its disgusting and not right. I was guilty of it on amberscherry.com ill admit, but never again did i produce another site along those lines.

you confuse me, too much text... must drink more...


im wrong in my post?

so 14-17 yr old dressed up posed in sexy positions is cool with you?

thats what i am getting out of your statement

so you like little kids?

<18 Non-Nude should be criminal.

But what is wrong with 18+ Non-Nude sites?