CHOKER - Why the no nonnude rule!?
 

Hey,

Can you please explain why you dont accept non nude galleries?
Was gonna purchase a chunk of traffic from your new system but noticed:

12. NEW: Your gallery must contain nudity.

WHY?!

Am willing to buy between $1,000-$3,000 but to HOT non nude teen girl galleries.

Because I do not have a non-nude gallery category, and if I did I doubt if very many tgps would list it. This is what I have now


https://chokertraffic.com/public/tabs.php?t=1

I hate it when tgp owners have that rule. Nonnude sells so well on teen tgps. Often better than hardcore galleries. TGP owners who have that rule often have no clue. If they had a clue they wouldnt ban it.

Get a nn category. Its big scene with a lot of money going on. Dont underestimate it. Not all surfers want to see nudity and hardcore. So many people dont understand this.

I do very well with non-nude galleries on nude TGP sites. And my surfers don't seem to care either.

I'ver never had one single complaint about listing non-nude teen/babe galleries.

So my gallery would not be allowed to be submitted into the gal_brunettes_teens category even though she is brunette and a teen?

I really dont see the logic behind this (not being offensive, jus trying to help u and me out).

(1) If a surfer clicks on a link on someones site that states that there are brunette teens if he clicks the link and he sees this he would be happy.

(2) If a surfer clicks on a link on someones site that states that there are NUDE brunette teens if he clicks the link and he sees this he would close the gallery and click on the link again (or one underneath if the tgp is set up to have a bunch of links one under the other) and therefore increase the webmasters productivity, and your overall traffic.

In the case of (2) the tgp owner is happy (cause his productivity is up and he sent u an extra hit therefore he made more money... not a lot more but either way more)

You are happy because you got the extra hit.

Im not the happiest camper in this situation but at a price of $1/1k it is affordable to take this little risk of a surfer not liking your gallery since non nudes convert better.

That gallery I would list under teen_underwear

One of the reasons I do not want to get into teen non-nude is that guys would submit galleries of under 18 models, I don't want to go there at all. underwear is fine but will be lsited as teen_underwear gallery, not a teen gallery. If a surfer wants to see a teen in panties, then he will click on a link that says teens in underwear etc

Fuck dude, why? Why would someone submit underaged girls and not with nude sites? You wont get 1 more underaged gallery with nonnude as you would with a strictly nude rule. Ignorant.

Ok fair enough I kinda can understand where you are going with the non nude explanation.

So would you accept non nude (meaning showing no pink and no tits) teen galleries if submitted under teen_underwear even though 12. NEW: Your gallery must contain nudity. ??

Very valid point.
This could be avoided by requesting 2257 info.

I dont wanna argue this point because I dont wanna be too much of an ass lol, just thought I could change the no non nude gals rule since sooooo many tgps list non nude gals and do great with them.

Even though they are only 12? no they still have to be 18 or older. Underwear category galleries are exempt from the having to show nudity rule. I will update the rules page to reflect this

lol I think he means even though of rule number 12 :)

I took the 12 from your rules page (the no non nude rule is #12) sorry for the misunderstanding. Of course all my gals are 18+.

Thank you for clearing up the that underwear category galleries are exempt from the having to show nudity rule

Ah ok LOL, sorry about that misunderstamding

Shhhhh sh