Anal Sex Bloopers - REAL STORY!
 

One of the postives of being the [email protected] which I often stated that I have protected it's 100% anonymity for over a decade is the stories that both men an women share with me ...

Here is a true story that was relayed to me the other day ...
(paraphrased)


true stuff ; )

That's disgusting.

[I was going to say out popped Boobmaster posts. Butt (pun intended) - I won't]
: )

Fuck that is funny!!!! :1orglaugh

Ya - it is.
The story does teach.

Many women actually like those anal beads when they come out at the right time.

For women that like anal sex - it's way up their on their favourites list when removed with some common sence.

okie dokie

I hate it when I pull my cock out of a bitch and it is covered in shit. Kind of ruins the romance.

i read the same thing in the 'true lies' section of maxim magazine a while ago

It's hilarious.
and true.

Shut up, pedo.

Heard a similar story here but it was intentional.

Guy went to a club, picked up a hot chick and went home, she put the beads in his ass, ripped them out so he shit all over the place then she rolled around in it getting all scat-tacular.

not sure if that's an urban legend or not.

thats a very kinky story

No way ???
you think he made this up?

He is the kind of guy that reads Maxim.

Another post about underage sex, you fucking sick bastard.

hahaah
that very worse lol

Can you post the issue and page?
I want to confront him on this.

Many guys use - like the post above - "urban legends" to enhance their sexual conversations with other guys.

Yeah pulling like a lawn mower was probably a bad idea, lol

I still tend to believe him even though this Maxim "issue" has come up.

It is the way he talks - and he does have the type of body that women like - muscular - he's a big boy - with no problem getting women.

And it wasn't his first story he relayed to me on that job site.

P 3 D 0 P H 1 L 3

maybe she was planning for that to happen?

I sale low icq cheep!

No ... that's not the impression I got.

The other was doing two married MUCH OLDER sisters in one night.
lol

that's for real

About MasterBlogger - sexeducation.com - "John E. Beacock"

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...hreadid=268705
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...hreadid=268222
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...hreadid=261062
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...hreadid=261049
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...hreadid=249464
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...hreadid=241429
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...hreadid=241307
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...hreadid=228383

The Suite 353, Unit 204, 1440 52 Street NE address he so proudly posts is a PO box.

The pictures were on a page that basically told fellow pedophiles where to go to get hosting for their crap.

He continues to defend having the page and content by saying that it's a smear compaign against him because he talks about the "truth" regarding the adult biz.

God that nickname got unbanned too ?

No - when I appologized to Loryn for taking a wrong manner in getting a domain name (use your imagination) ending in ".CP" shut down ...

She unbanned SexEducation - I prefer MasterBlogger. But I will stick to more or less SexEducation issues.

]

I have answered everyone of these links several times.
I will again - but you will need to ask Lensman or Loryn if I can.
In previous threads where I have answered these "claims" several have posted they changed their minds about me.

SHUT THE FUCK UP PEDO.

Oh yeah? When did that happen? Or is that just your latest spin on it. Post the threads then where you actually try and spin it to your advantage.

What did it cost you to get that post count?

WHY ARE YOU POSTING A STORY ABOUT A 17 YEAR OLD (UNDERAGE) HAVING ANAL SEX?

You were 17 and a chick asks you to fucker her in the ass and you say no? Hell when I was 12 and thought about doing chicks up the butt. Man I would have tore that bitches ass up! I bet that chicks ass was sore after you pretended it was a Snapper.

I hereby give permission to ANY LEGAL AUTHORITY anywhere in the world to post any private interview regarding EVEN the suspicion of , charged but charges dropped, investigate where I was contacted by phone, email, snail-mail, all communications with me personally - regarding - rape, child molestation, child pornography, suspicion of the distribution of child pornography or sexual deviant crimes or EVEN the suspicion of - WITHOUT LEGAL RECOURSE.

SexEducation.com (hopefully owned by Consumption Junction one day) will always be 100% anonymous and will ALWAYS be able to talk about any sexual subject.

Bow to the power of a MasterBlogger.

This will be the last time I reply to you ever - unless you stop your automatic insults.

The facts as relayed to me are from a 26 year old about to be married - about his experiences as a 17 year old.

This is an adult website right?
Teenagers do have sex right?

Adults can discuss those issue here like they can on other websites right?

answer the questions.

ADDENDUM: Unless it is against board rules.
But I have not read a board rule that says adults can't discuss the behaviour of minors. Nor even by "netiquette" have I inferred that.

The fact is that you can't relate a single "story" from your sick ass site without it having to do in some way with children or underaged teens.

Why don't you just go the fuck away?

No shit!

So I take it then that you don't actually have any threads where you truthfull "answered" the claims etc.

What's your relationship with a John Anderson by the way.

Hi pedo. Bye.

No - there are about 6 threads now - one with over 11,000 posts where I have answered every question - every time.
GFY has disabled my search function which appears to be working for others - but not me - otherwise I would just quote previous threads. Answered - several and repeated times.


You mean - ? (purposely not posted) Anderson.
I registered a couple of domains for him.

Just like I registered hundreds of domains.

like ...

InternetDomains.com

...
the list goes on and on ...

Given the crap you spew I have no reason to believe you... If it was important to you you would already have the threads bookmarked. Let me know when you have something to refute the info I have.

that story is Disgusting . . . ..

but FUNY 1 . ..

I have lost my hard drive twice!!!
I had a backup directly in private directories (not publically accessible) on SexEducation.com but it got shut down.

I've lost most of my research - hence - the complete lack of motivation to redue my website for the 100'th time in consideration of recent 2257 freedom of speech issues and the most retarded thing I've ever hear of - Acacia patent claims regarding video.

sexeducation:

Instead of trying to dress yourself up in some "nice" persona and come out with "personal experiences" about your "website" - the parts that did not involved under age kids - can you explain why you had images of children involved in these acts on your "websites"?

Also, can you explain why you felt a need to attractive children to your website by "promoting" it on websites and forums which would clearly be read by children??

Further, why did you invite children to correspond with you? Was this part of their "sex education"?

I know ...
but it's even funnier when you know the guy that told me this.

He's probably one of the strongest 15 people you will ever meet in you life. built. built.built.

sexeducation:

Don't worry - I got a lot of your "research" here on CD's and some other folks have them as well. It's all secure!

I have never posted children engaged in sexual acts on my website.

I HAVE post CENSORED GRAPHICS of Brooke Shields in the movies "Blue Lagoon", "Return to Blue Lagoo" and "Pretty Baby" which many still think until this day - is child pornography. I only discussed the issue using screen shots from videos STILL available at my local video store here in Calgary Canda.

Once again - I will say - send me a copy.
But that request by me to you for the upteenst time - has never occured..


Send me a copy ...

That is absolutely correct!:thumbsup
Time...it all takes time.

So you are going to charge Brooke Shields with child pornorgraphy right?

And you are going to charge my local video store with child pornography right?

Or STFU Webby?

Which is it?