![]() |
Comments about the new 2257 regulations and the porn industry in general.
Most people here don't have a clue with what's really going on backstage. They think they can move the files offshore or think they are safe just because they only have double anal *softcore!?!* pictures.
:1orglaugh Well, that's not my point. Some people here act like whining crack whores about the fact that the government is being hard with the porn industry. I only have one question for you guys. Be honest. Don't u think that with all the millions of free harcore pictures available on the net, and the "we don't give a fuck it's not my problem" attitude, we actually made it easier for the government extremists? This industry is still very young if you think about it (The internet porn that is). Those new regulations is a slap in the face. But if everyone actually decided to self-regulate the industry, maybe we wouldn't have to face what's going on right now. It's a fucking mess right now. Some people asked for it. Face your responbilities. |
bingo :thumbsup
|
Yeah, wonder how many sites aren't even properly labeled:
http://www.icra.org/ The easiest thing we could all do to avoid govt intervention.... |
Quote:
http://news.zdnet.co.uk/internet/sec...9163890,00.htm They are already starting work on shipping it with Frontpage. Regards, Lee |
Quote:
:helpme |
Quote:
Bottom line, every major browser today supports ICRA labeled parental filtering (and has been for yrs now), so webmasters not labeling are simply lazy and irresponsible. |
Quote:
Regards, Lee |
Don't you think it's a bit naive to think that this industry will ever self-regulate itself?
|
Quote:
If the big players want to self-regulate the industry. They can do it. |
Quote:
All it would take in my opinion is for major affiliate programs (or the like), to team up and require adult sites to be labeled to get paid! Even if there was a little more pressure on webmasters (maybe with an organization like ASACP), we would all be better off. |
you must be joking.. the industry regulate itself? What could anyone possibly do to enforce this type of thing?
There are always going to be the renegades no matter what we do. Making yourself less of a target by following the rules seems the best way to me. Webmasters have always used warning pages as a "show of good faith" as using them provides no legal protection at all. Has this helped? Well I know one way it's helped.. it's helped anyone who wants to find a bunch of porn sites quickly. Now there may be ways we can protect ourselves better, but regulating ourselves.... it'll never happen |
Quote:
Expecting this industry to self-regulate itself is like trying to herd cats. It 'aint gonna happen. |
Quote:
Clickcash wouldn't pay me the first time unless I added this line on the page showing their content. "All models on Wild Monkey Sex are 18 years of age or older at the time of depiction." I have no problem with that, my designer at the time didn't think it was necessary at the time, but we have the warning page, the ICRA rating on the homepage and the mainpage. I know its prolly losing some hits to the site, but its also traffic I don't need. |
Quote:
Don't you think it's time to talk about it and focus more on a "pre-emptive" strategy instead of always managing the aftermath? If you say that self-regulation in this industry is impossible then I guess we'll have to stop whining. And let the government decide what's best for this industry. |
Quote:
|
like I said, I think it would be better to concentrate on how to protect ourselves better, and leave the regulating to the government.
|
Quote:
If you're a sponsor, ask all your affiliates to register with a parent control software, or make sure that there is a warning page.. Or they don't get paid.. Look, I'm not here to bring a solution. I'm just saying it's time to do something about it. |
Quote:
I've always wanted to see this kind of thing happen, but it has to start at the top.. some big sponsor has to start it and prove that it's a viable plan |
The problem is that either way it's risky, waiting for the government to force us to change things may hurt business, using a pre-emptive strategy may hurt it as well when competitors don't do the same.
Reminds me alot on the TGP2 movement some time ago: Everybody thought it would be a great idea, but noone wanted to be the first offering less free porn and risking bookmarkers this way, so this concept that would have made everybody more money never became really popular. Same situation today, everybody is waiting for others to make the first step...and it will continue this way until a law forces people to change things. I don't say self regulation is impossible, but it needs the big guys to speak up and start changing things. Until this day, everybody will keep dreaming of no more free hardcore on the net and all the money that could be made if surfers always had to pay for XXX... |
I've been in the porn business since '97
I dreamed of a no hardcore adult industry then, and I still dream of it now 7 years later Government regulation was the only link missing in that beautiful plan because there will always be someone wanting to try to make a quick buck by showing hardcore. Bookmarkers.. yes tgp owners and webmasters who submit to tgp oppose each other like a tug of war |
Traffic takes the path of least resistance.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
good thread :thumbsup
personally I say fuck the government they are corrupt as fuck :thumbsup guidelines still need followed if you don't want to get owned by them tho HEH |
yeah when sponsors try to rip off surfers selling fake penis growth pills... that really helps mess things up IMO
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:16 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123