GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Looking for PICTURE content providers that comply with the new 2257 regulations... (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=338284)

Oracle Porn 08-09-2004 08:47 AM

Looking for PICTURE content providers that comply with the new 2257 regulations...
 
New PICTURE content for the following niches...

Lingerie
Smoking
Grannies
Mature
Dildos
Squirting
BBW
Ebony
Pee
Panties

no hardcore please....

spam me

crockett 08-09-2004 08:49 AM

how can they comply with the new regulation when it hasen't even been set as law.

Oracle Porn 08-09-2004 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by crockett
how can they comply with the new regulation when it hasen't even been set as law.
sigh....
god people if you are clueless please don't show it off in public...
the new regulations have been posted....period.

Juicy D. Links 08-09-2004 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Oracle Porn
sigh....
god people if you are clueless please don't show it off in public...
the new regulations have been posted....period.

thought you were moving to israel

Oracle Porn 08-09-2004 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by juicylinks
thought you were moving to israel
I am, doesn't mean I don't want to TRY to comply with the new regulations.

johndoebob 08-09-2004 09:02 AM

Dildos | limited possible
Squirting | impossible
Pee | impossible

How do you want to make softcore content of those actions?!

Oracle Porn 08-09-2004 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by johndoebob
Dildos | limited possible
Squirting | impossible
Pee | impossible

How do you want to make softcore content of those actions?!

why the fuck would I make softcore content!?

StuartD 08-09-2004 09:10 AM

:batman

dready 08-09-2004 09:12 AM

You can't comply with something that doesn't exsist and isn't a law.

johndoebob 08-09-2004 09:15 AM

Quote:

why the fuck would I make softcore content!?
Not you but a content producer.

Definition of softcore:

Nude posing ok, sexual intercourse from angles where you can't see pussy or dick ok, peeing not ok, squirting not ok,pussy spreading not ok, that's the general softcore definition just to clear you up.

Anyway go to ounique.com to buy your content, Don is a good guy and has lots of content.

johndoebob 08-09-2004 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by dready
You can't comply with something that doesn't exsist and isn't a law.
Yeah but I guess it'll pass cause everybody is anti porn and doesn't read new bills anyway.

Tom_PMs 08-09-2004 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by johndoebob
sexual intercourse from angles where you can't see pussy or dick ok
I believe the new additions would make this "suggestive" of being "sexually explicit" actually...

Even if a solo girl has her hand covering her pussy it might be suggestive of being sexually explicit. How do you not know if she's masturbating?

Oracle Porn 08-09-2004 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by johndoebob
Not you but a content producer.

Definition of softcore:

Nude posing ok, sexual intercourse from angles where you can't see pussy or dick ok, peeing not ok, squirting not ok,pussy spreading not ok, that's the general softcore definition just to clear you up.

Anyway go to ounique.com to buy your content, Don is a good guy and has lots of content.

I got no idea what are you talking about....

johndoebob 08-09-2004 09:23 AM

Well in europe you can see that kind of softcore porn all night long on TV for free, if a kid watches that at 1am it won't have a clue what they are doing.A kid without sexuality won't even think of things being "sexual suggestive" that's why it would be bullshit.

Sites like teenplanet.org have no nudity anymore.

freeadultcontent 08-09-2004 09:25 AM

Oracle porn, even though these new proposed regulations may pass, there is still a good chance they will be amended and or changed again before the deadline. If they are altered in anyway we are looking at another 30 day comment period and another 30 day grace compliance period.
We all know the 2257 will be changed, yet trying to second guess what the outcome would officially be is not a wise move.
If you are replacing content or looking for new providers it would be the best bet to hold off until we all know what is officiall.
:2 cents:

Oracle Porn 08-09-2004 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by freeadultcontent
Oracle porn, even though these new proposed regulations may pass, there is still a good chance they will be amended and or changed again before the deadline. If they are altered in anyway we are looking at another 30 day comment period and another 30 day grace compliance period.
We all know the 2257 will be changed, yet trying to second guess what the outcome would officially be is not a wise move.
If you are replacing content or looking for new providers it would be the best bet to hold off until we all know what is officiall.
:2 cents:

I'm not replacing anything, that's why I'm moving to Israel...not to replace shit.

My current content provider stopped selling content until further notice, so I'm looking for some new content...

WTF is the problem with providing me 2 forms of IDs' a copy of the PROPER release form and the copyrights.

Buzz 08-09-2004 09:31 AM

We've got some dildo softcore on PicsMasters

Buzz

[email protected]
ICQ 109571715

Oracle Porn 08-09-2004 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by PicsMasters
We've got some dildo softcore on PicsMasters

Buzz

[email protected]
ICQ 109571715

1) dildo isn't softcore
2) im not registering, got a pass?

studio 08-09-2004 09:44 AM

Oracle Porn,

I can shoot that stuff for you all day long... All I shoot is exclusive. It comes with, ID's, i will use your own release, that you provide for me to use. and you get all the rights to the photos when the invoice is paid.

Hit me on ICQ, or look me up at internext if you are going.

thanks,
denny
Studio 28

Love Brokers 08-09-2004 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Oracle Porn
I'm not replacing anything, that's why I'm moving to Israel...not to replace shit.

My current content provider stopped selling content until further notice, so I'm looking for some new content...

WTF is the problem with providing me 2 forms of IDs' a copy of the PROPER release form and the copyrights.

We are still zipping and loading LOTS of content. Take a look at what we have up so far. www.contentjunky.com

Good luck in Israel.:thumbsup
And we have 2257 material on file!

Denis_SC 08-09-2004 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Oracle Porn
New PICTURE content for the following niches...

Lingerie
Smoking
Grannies
Mature
Dildos
Squirting
BBW
Ebony
Pee
Panties

no hardcore please....

spam me

We can do exclusive that will comply with a new regulations .

Hit me up if interested . :glugglug

Paul Markham 08-09-2004 09:54 AM

We supply a picture of the model holding two Goverment issued IDs, usually a Passport and National ID, next to her face on EVERY set.

We supply a model release with a matching signature.

Some of us have been 2257 compliant since the 80s. I spoke to a few magazines and they said we do not need to make any changes to our documents system. Only small people like Hustler, Score and P.R.O. all companies with their own lawyers. So I think we are going to be in the clear.

crockett 08-09-2004 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Oracle Porn
sigh....
god people if you are clueless please don't show it off in public...
the new regulations have been posted....period.

how am I the clueless one, the law has not been put in place yet and it will very likey change.. How can you expect a content provider to comply by a proposed law?.

I never ragged on you when people made fun of you in every other topic.. but damn seems like you deserve it.

crockett 08-09-2004 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by charly
We supply a picture of the model holding two Goverment issued IDs, usually a Passport and National ID, next to her face on EVERY set.

We supply a model release with a matching signature.

Some of us have been 2257 compliant since the 80s. I spoke to a few magazines and they said we do not need to make any changes to our documents system. Only small people like Hustler, Score and P.R.O. all companies with their own lawyers. So I think we are going to be in the clear.

yea exactly I don't see why this is such a big deal to people, I will admit I was a little worried about it when I first started reading the threads.

But all in all not much will change for people that follow the original 2257 law as far as the records go. I know I've never bought content before that the content provider didn't give me a photo ID and the model release. The only content I've ever gotten with out models Id's is sponsor provided which will soon have to change.

The only things that will affect me on this new law is submitted galleries and their thumbnails which are on my server, but it's not hard to work around that for me at least.

XamoDoug 08-09-2004 10:24 AM

We took all of our photo sets about six months ago and moved them off of xamo.com onto ezsets.com - the idea was to put the model id and release (blacked out for privacy reasons) into every set, along with the 2257 info. then we started picking up new photographers and requiring that they give us the model id / release / 2257 info if they want us to sell their photos ezsets officially launched a couple weeks ago, now that we've built up enough new photo sets that fit our strict requirements

it was interesting how many foreign photographers wanted to use us for an outlet but didn't have all the proper ids, many of them just had amazing content but only a signed release and no photo id

porn oracle I think we have everything you're looking for, take a look at the categories

Mr-No 08-09-2004 10:43 AM

If you want exclusive/custom, hit me up... I can shoot that content easily (excpet Ebony, I cna't find them here)... You will get two ID's and even MRF in your name...

Mr-No 08-09-2004 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by XamoDoug

it was interesting how many foreign photographers wanted to use us for an outlet but didn't have all the proper ids, many of them just had amazing content but only a signed release and no photo id

Hmm... I'm a part of that "foreign photographers" but I never shooted model without passport or two different government issued ID's...

tranza 08-09-2004 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by juicylinks
thought you were moving to israel
:helpme :(

JBdeB 08-09-2004 11:42 AM

I can not see what the big deal is either, ok was a pain in the arse putting the mr's & id's in all the sets, so now you get them even if you don't want them !

AaronM 08-09-2004 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Oracle Porn
New PICTURE content for the following niches...

Lingerie
Smoking
Grannies
Mature
Dildos
Squirting
BBW
Ebony
Pee
Panties

no hardcore please....

spam me


I comply...But I refuse to do business with idiots. :glugglug

AaronM 08-09-2004 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by freeadultcontent
Oracle porn, even though these new proposed regulations may pass, there is still a good chance they will be amended and or changed again before the deadline. If they are altered in anyway we are looking at another 30 day comment period and another 30 day grace compliance period.
We all know the 2257 will be changed, yet trying to second guess what the outcome would officially be is not a wise move.
If you are replacing content or looking for new providers it would be the best bet to hold off until we all know what is officiall.
:2 cents:


I disagree. Yes, the final regulations may very slightly but they are pretty much common sense as far as a content producer is concerned. If the producer is covering his ass correctly then they are already compliant with the new regs. :2 cents:

AaronM 08-09-2004 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Oracle Porn
WTF is the problem with providing me 2 forms of IDs' a copy of the PROPER release form and the copyrights.
1: The law does not require 2 forms of ID.....(Only 1)

2: The law does not require a release. A release products the photographer from the model. A proper license protects you.

3: The law does not require transfer of copyrights.


So....You start a thread asking about providers who comply with proposed regulations but the 3 things you specifically request are not required by those regulations.


It's things like this that make me think you are an idiot.

abyss_al 08-09-2004 12:00 PM

if you want exclusive, we can shoot it... we only do exclusive..see sig

m2mm 08-09-2004 03:08 PM

Our fresh sets:
smoking set 1
smoking set 2
lingerie set 1
lingerie set 2
lingerie set 3
lingerie set 4
lingerie set 5
lingerie set 6
panties set 1
panties set 2

info @ domyphoto.com

PerfectionGirls 08-09-2004 03:17 PM

Thanks AaronM...

Thats all we need is guys like this causing more confusion over this law.

Aaron is exactly right on this issue.

Oracle Porn 08-09-2004 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by AaronM
1: The law does not require 2 forms of ID.....(Only 1)

2: The law does not require a release. A release products the photographer from the model. A proper license protects you.

3: The law does not require transfer of copyrights.


So....You start a thread asking about providers who comply with proposed regulations but the 3 things you specifically request are not required by those regulations.


It's things like this that make me think you are an idiot.

1) 2 form of ids, I'm just covering my ass...never can be too careful.

2) I require a release.

3) I require copyrights.

Oracle Porn 08-09-2004 03:41 PM

P.S. I'm not looking for exclusive.

fantasycontent 08-09-2004 04:18 PM

if you are still looking let me know i can help...

89361136 icq
[email protected]

RicardoB 08-09-2004 05:36 PM

Or do a little shopping
http://www.2dxtremenetwork.com/dbase/links.php?cat=38

:thumbsup

baddog 08-09-2004 06:05 PM

Check out ContentShopper - We bring the content providers to you

be sure to check out the Advanced Search feature

Mr-No 08-09-2004 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Oracle Porn
P.S. I'm not looking for exclusive.
Let me clear this...

You want MRF and copyrights for non-exclusive content??? :eek7

Shortly you want to re-sell without rights for re-selling, but with all papers which will indicate that you are the owner :321GFY

Oracle Porn 08-09-2004 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mr-No
Let me clear this...

You want MRF and copyrights for non-exclusive content??? :eek7

Shortly you want to re-sell without rights for re-selling, but with all papers which will indicate that you are the owner :321GFY

wtf?
copyrights to USE the content on my sites, not to sell it dude...

i dont want to sell content, i dont have the time to sell content and even less I would WANT to deal with other webmasters...

please don't talk shit when you dont know shit...dumbass....

Paul Waters 08-09-2004 06:33 PM

I am complient, but I don't sell to virgins.....

Sorry dude.....

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Mr-No 08-09-2004 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Oracle Porn
wtf?
copyrights to USE the content on my sites, not to sell it dude...

i dont want to sell content, i dont have the time to sell content and even less I would WANT to deal with other webmasters...

please don't talk shit when you dont know shit...dumbass....

You made that misunderstanding...
AaronM said "The law does not require transfer of copyrights", and you reply with "I require copyrights"...

Well, you can't get copyrights for non-exclusive...
You can get rights to use content with restrictions, if you brake any of restrictions you don't have any rights on content...
You understand what I want to say?
Copyrights stays at owner of content, and you aren't owner, you just have rights to use that pics on your sites (with restrictions of course)...

And, I'm not going to use words as "shit" or "dumbass"...

AaronM 08-09-2004 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mr-No
You made that misunderstanding...
AaronM said "The law does not require transfer of copyrights", and you reply with "I require copyrights"...

Well, you can't get copyrights for non-exclusive...
You can get rights to use content with restrictions, if you brake any of restrictions you don't have any rights on content...
You understand what I want to say?
Copyrights stays at owner of content, and you aren't owner, you just have rights to use that pics on your sites (with restrictions of course)...

And, I'm not going to use words as "shit" or "dumbass"...

Glad to see that somebody gets it.

Oracle Porn 08-09-2004 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mr-No
You made that misunderstanding...
AaronM said "The law does not require transfer of copyrights", and you reply with "I require copyrights"...

Well, you can't get copyrights for non-exclusive...
You can get rights to use content with restrictions, if you brake any of restrictions you don't have any rights on content...
You understand what I want to say?
Copyrights stays at owner of content, and you aren't owner, you just have rights to use that pics on your sites (with restrictions of course)...

And, I'm not going to use words as "shit" or "dumbass"...

that's exactly what I was looking for, right WITH resrtictions.

AaronM 08-09-2004 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Oracle Porn
that's exactly what I was looking for, right WITH resrtictions.
Wrong.

You want a non exclusive web license.....Copyright is a very different animal.

As for the release.......I am sick of beating that issue into the ground. Please learn WTF you are talking about. I'm done trying to help you idiots learn.

Kevin2 08-09-2004 08:44 PM

Take a look at Centerfoldbabes they have what you need.

m2mm 08-11-2004 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Oracle Porn
P.S. I'm not looking for exclusive.
30 smoking sets for $100
30 dildo sets for $100


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123