-
Get you some vibrators for women now! -
that's one hell of a link -
it's on steroidsOriginally posted by brizzad
that's one hell of a linkGet you some vibrators for women now!Comment
-
Welcome to last week.I post on GFY so that when people ask me what I do,
I can tell them that I work with the mentally retarded.Comment
-
he edited it down to sizeOriginally posted by wvuatl
it's on steroids
Comment
-
yes, I know... but it's so much fun to bash that movieOriginally posted by BRISK
Welcome to last week.
Get you some vibrators for women now!Comment
-
-
Make a decision based on the credible intelligence reports gathered from 4 countries - you're a liar.
Purposely edit / fabricate newspaper headlines - you're an artist.
He really is a tub of shit.
Comment
-
"The paper is seeking $1 in damages" wtf
.Comment
-
Ahh the inevitable comparison between a President, and a movie maker, lol.
apples to peanuts
You've read it, you can't unread it.Comment
-
Nobody is comparing them, just pointing out the hypocrisy.Originally posted by Tom_PM
Ahh the inevitable comparison between a President, and a movie maker, lol.
apples to peanutsComment
-
BTW: In Bush's news conference today, he said that if he knew then what he knows now, we still would have gone into Iraq exactly like we did. He went on to say that they had the capability to build weapons of mass destruction, and links to al-qaeda network.. lol.
So, you can read into that what you want to obviously.
You've read it, you can't unread it.Comment
-
-
and who better to trust than the state of florida to stand up for Bush and speak out against Moore.
I still trust Moore's version than a florida newspaper that can be paid off anydayComment
-
Yep, just saw that tooOriginally posted by ztik
"The paper is seeking $1 in damages" wtf
Comment
-
Originally posted by TheLegacy
and who better to trust than the state of florida to stand up for Bush and speak out against Moore.
I still trust Moore's version than a florida newspaper that can be paid off anyday
what would it take to convince you that Moore made that up?Get you some vibrators for women now!Comment
-
Originally posted by BRISK
Welcome to last week.Comment
-
Originally posted by Tom_PM
BTW: In Bush's news conference today, he said that if he knew then what he knows now, we still would have gone into Iraq exactly like we did. He went on to say that they had the capability to build weapons of mass destruction, and links to al-qaeda network.. lol.
So, you can read into that what you want to obviously.
he's building the foundation for this month... it's "lets point out Kerry's Flip Flopping" month at the Whitehouse...
I think it's going to get bloody
Get you some vibrators for women now!Comment
-
The thing about the newspaper I havent looked at in the movie. I'm guessing they made a paper and showed it as if it was a front page headline.
I'm not sure how misleading that is really as to the validity of the actual words on the page. Obviously if it was a page 3 headline over a letter to the editor it's different than a front page headline. But the argument could be made that it was used for "illustrative" purposes. ie: not plagiarism or copyright infringement.
Not sure if that is so misleading as to constitutes a lie or not. But it's clearly not an accurate portrayal of the actual front page. But again, I'm not sure if it was meant to be shown as an actual factual front page headline, or illustrating something, lmao. Need to see the movie again now I guess.. sheesh.
You've read it, you can't unread it.Comment
-
blah blah blah who cares , like that had ANYTHING to do with the movie..
Did you even watch the movie. ??hatisblack at yahoo.comComment
-
Welcome to last week ... one change for the cover ... big dealOriginally posted by rayadp05Comment
-
michael moore's distortions have nothing on bush's all out lies.Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war.Comment
-
Distortions no, lies yes.Originally posted by smack
michael moore's distortions have nothing on bush's all out lies.
Why don't you list all the Bush lies.
Comment
-
yeah, I'm not sure who is more pathetic, Moore supporters or Moore bashers...Originally posted by Tom_PM
The thing about the newspaper I havent looked at in the movie. I'm guessing they made a paper and showed it as if it was a front page headline.
I'm not sure how misleading that is really as to the validity of the actual words on the page. Obviously if it was a page 3 headline over a letter to the editor it's different than a front page headline. But the argument could be made that it was used for "illustrative" purposes. ie: not plagiarism or copyright infringement.
Not sure if that is so misleading as to constitutes a lie or not. But it's clearly not an accurate portrayal of the actual front page. But again, I'm not sure if it was meant to be shown as an actual factual front page headline, or illustrating something, lmao. Need to see the movie again now I guess.. sheesh.Comment
Comment