Why content producers don't give out id's.
 

This is why content producers hate to give out id's.

Look at the last pic on that gallery. Fucking brilliant. FYI this gallery is CURRENTLY running on THE HUN!

:1orglaugh

The funniest fuckin thing is that it says "Only British Girls" and her passport is Czech.

looks like paul markem content?

Maybe it´s a dating line and they want to point out that traveling is necessary to meet that specific girl.

hmm makes you wonder if that pic was distributed as part of the content and not a seperate image outside of the content zip

thats pretty fucking sad that they included it in their gallery. pretty fucking amateur.

That's bad.

I have to believe that's a fuckup. Nobody could be that stupid.

They probably just ran the pics through an automated gallery maker and didn't even check the pics.

Somebody should contact the owner of that site and get that off of there for the model's protection.

:BangBang: :BangBang:

What's really bad about the new regs going into effect requiring a copy of the model's ID is that it will be easy for a stalker to order a minimum set of a girl he's hot for and have access to it.

What's REALLY bad is that now that the webmaster has run the submitter, any changes he makes to the gallery automatically blacklists him from pretty much everywhere.

It has to stay up. Although I think he probably deserves blacklisting anyway for this. And why is he giving away THIRTY pics in a gallery?

THAT's SO BAD MAN I CAN"T BELIEVE IT BURN THOSE MOTHERSfUCKERSS AH@H@H@!*(!@)#

What a fucking idiot. :BangBang:

Can't he just reupload that one picture to something different? and leave the thumb/html intact? you cant see much from just the thumb

wow, nice...makes me glad there are such intelligent webmasters out there...

In this case the content provider is also the sponsor I believe, seems like both the sponsor and the affiliate fucked up

Well, if he picks another image and names it the exact same as the previous image I don't think they would be able to tell. The HTML is the same, no changes. Regardless though, TheHun is reasonable and if the situation is explained I am sure he would be able to switch the picture without getting banned.

I have a big objection to people having easy access to model ID's. I think over time you are going to find a lot of cases of stalking or much worse. I also think models will be much more leary of getting into the business.

The thing is, who in the hell doesn't check his galleries before submitting them? Was this done on purpose? Was this some guys idea of letting people think that not only do you get to see pics but get to find out what their real names are? Who knows with webmasters these days.

Tried that once on a TGP. It wasn't that bad a fuckup but something that had to be changed after my gallery was up. I ended up getting banned from that tgp for it.

And yes, you can see enough information. That picture is a stalker's wet dream

Fuck all the other shit.

I love her tits and nipples. :thumbsup

They could just blur the crap of the ID's and make sure the filesize doesn't change.

You can't change a thing. Once it's submitted if even one filesize changes you're boned.

What a fucking douche.

How fucking stupid can people really get?




One thing though, is those ID's shes holding up, do not look like her.

She's not hot enough to have stalkers

LOL yeah girls in porn shoots always look like that, most of them are $2 whores with a $50 makeup job

what a fucking retard

That's one of the most stupid things I have seen in a while

what a fucking retard, i wonder how he got listed with that included

And why content providers shouldn't put 2257 info in the same folder as the content.

Doesn't 2257 require a US ISSUED id? Thats a czech id - so is that not valid?

Tripple ROFL

That's just sad

No. It requires a State issued ID.

That probably caught the attention of a lot of surfers :)

Why would the gallery maker think that the surfers care about seeing her ID and passport?

What a idiot.

a side question for this... would that model/producer have any legal recourse against the gallery maker for actually putting that on the gallery where people can se her personal/real info?

actually I dont know many big TGPs that will automatically ban you if you change something on your gal... Do you have exemples?

I would suggest taking the entire gallery down. 20-30 sales is not worth the thousands the model will sue him for.

Just my :2 cents:

DH

So in other word.. content providers from Europe or Canada wont be able to sell content of non-us models to US webmasters..?

Not at all. The new rules state a "passport issued by the United States or foreign country". If the US Government accepts this as a form of ID to enter the country, I'm pretty sure a passport provides the model's age.

(b) Picture identification card means a document issued by the United States, a State government or a political subdivision thereof, or a United States territory that bears the photograph and the name of the individual identified, and provides sufficient specific information that it can be accessed from the issuing authority, e.g., a passport issued by the United States or a foreign country, driver's license issued by a State or the District of Columbia, or identification card issued by a State or the District of Columbia.

That girl is only 19?

Fuck me, she could pass for 29.

I call bullshit.

well i hate to say this but maybe a few psycho pervs going postal on some content girls is what we need to have them rethink 2257. I'm sure the backlash would be amazing.
duke

Exclusive british chics from Praha :glugglug

ashame..

Was thinking the same

if you want a real laugh

http://www.onlytease.com/viewmodel.c...16/IndexPage/5

that is my wife...he bought those sets from us

we live in Atlanta

Maybe the webmaster put some bullshit age and id on purpose to catch the attention of the surfers ...

Jace, your wife is hot. It was cool having the BEST SALMON IN THE WORLD with you at CJ's dinner.

And xxxdesign, I would ban the shit out of anyone that changed anything after submitting it to us. I don't think I could name anyone who wouldn't ban the shit out of someone for changing content. IF I caught it.

LMAO

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh