GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Do you need to comply with the 2257 for a nn site? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=333991)

Oracle Porn 07-30-2004 08:05 PM

Do you need to comply with the 2257 for a nn site?
 
for a site like www.tiffanyteen.com?

Lycanthrope 07-30-2004 11:10 PM

Bumpity

My opinion, which means shit, is this:

If the site / models are truly non nude, I'm talking no see through bras or anything, there are no 2257 issues. Therefore, there is nothing for you to comply with.

I still feel one should have an exemption statement however.

Jace 07-30-2004 11:15 PM

i would have to agree with Lycanthrope, there is nothing on a non nude site that falls into the 2257 category

Theo 07-30-2004 11:15 PM

no nude
no sex
= you dont have

a1ka1ine 07-31-2004 04:02 AM

hmm i thought you would do as although they are nonnude the sites are clearly sexual in nature, and a girl spreading her legs with the camera zoomed in on her underwear would probably require 2257. i hope it would, because otherwise that would make it totally legal for a site of someone underage to exist that was nonnude - so, surely 2257 applies

pxxx 07-31-2004 04:09 AM

This 2275 stuff have really become a pain, but we can do nothing but find ways to comply.

Mutt 07-31-2004 04:18 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by a1ka1ine
hmm i thought you would do as although they are nonnude the sites are clearly sexual in nature, and a girl spreading her legs with the camera zoomed in on her underwear would probably require 2257. i hope it would, because otherwise that would make it totally legal for a site of someone underage to exist that was nonnude - so, surely 2257 applies
interesting - i was just telling somebody yesterday that many of the shots on nn sites are far more nasty than a softcore totally nude glamour shoot - funny how a little piece of white cotton fabric changes things for alot of people. reminds me of the teenage girls these days i read about who are engaging in anal sex and still consider themselves 'virgins' .

Sexual in nature isn't a term in the 2257 law. 'Sexually explicit' is what it says. I really don't think most nn sites fall under 2257 - if there is simulated or real masturbation, yes, if her hand is down her panties and she appears to be playing with herself then that definitely falls under 2257 requirements, panties or no panties.

TheWildcard 07-31-2004 04:20 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Soul_Rebel
no nude
no sex
= you dont have

What he said.

Living For Today 07-31-2004 05:41 AM

Some nn sites are very explicit in nature so I would have to say it does apply.

Dirty F 07-31-2004 06:34 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mutt
interesting - i was just telling somebody yesterday that many of the shots on nn sites are far more nasty than a softcore totally nude glamour shoot - funny how a little piece of white cotton fabric changes things for alot of people. reminds me of the teenage girls these days i read about who are engaging in anal sex and still consider themselves 'virgins' .


Virgin anal teens - that turns me on for a reason.

dready 07-31-2004 07:03 AM

You still have to make a 2257 exemption statement.

HairToStay 07-31-2004 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mutt

Sexual in nature isn't a term in the 2257 law. 'Sexually explicit' is what it says. I really don't think most nn sites fall under 2257 - if there is simulated or real masturbation, yes, if her hand is down her panties and she appears to be playing with herself then that definitely falls under 2257 requirements, panties or no panties.

If she's not showing any pubes, you're ok.

Under 18 USC 2256 ....

(2)

''sexually explicit conduct'' means actual or simulated -

(A)

sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex;

(B)

bestiality;

(C)

masturbation;

(D)

sadistic or masochistic abuse; or

(E)

lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person;

CJswe 07-31-2004 09:50 AM

The new rules are a beauty for us outside the US, all persons I have discussed this with(I study commercial law) claim that since hosts can't be blamed, we can still host over there but not worry about at thing. its all about nationality. maybe time will prove us wrong, and by then we'll move. either way I feel sorry for you right now.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123