Do you need to comply with the 2257 for a nn site?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Oracle Porn
    Affiliate
    • Oct 2002
    • 24433

    #1

    Do you need to comply with the 2257 for a nn site?

    for a site like www.tiffanyteen.com?


  • Lycanthrope
    Confirmed User
    • Jan 2004
    • 4517

    #2
    Bumpity

    My opinion, which means shit, is this:

    If the site / models are truly non nude, I'm talking no see through bras or anything, there are no 2257 issues. Therefore, there is nothing for you to comply with.

    I still feel one should have an exemption statement however.

    Comment

    • Jace
      FBOP Class Of 2013
      • Jan 2004
      • 35562

      #3
      i would have to agree with Lycanthrope, there is nothing on a non nude site that falls into the 2257 category

      Comment

      • Theo
        HAL 9000
        • May 2001
        • 34515

        #4
        no nude
        no sex
        = you dont have

        Comment

        • a1ka1ine
          Confirmed User
          • Apr 2002
          • 3387

          #5
          hmm i thought you would do as although they are nonnude the sites are clearly sexual in nature, and a girl spreading her legs with the camera zoomed in on her underwear would probably require 2257. i hope it would, because otherwise that would make it totally legal for a site of someone underage to exist that was nonnude - so, surely 2257 applies

          Comment

          • pxxx
            First African GFY Member
            • Mar 2004
            • 12114

            #6
            This 2275 stuff have really become a pain, but we can do nothing but find ways to comply.

            Comment

            • Mutt
              Too lazy to set a custom title
              • Sep 2002
              • 34431

              #7
              Originally posted by a1ka1ine
              hmm i thought you would do as although they are nonnude the sites are clearly sexual in nature, and a girl spreading her legs with the camera zoomed in on her underwear would probably require 2257. i hope it would, because otherwise that would make it totally legal for a site of someone underage to exist that was nonnude - so, surely 2257 applies
              interesting - i was just telling somebody yesterday that many of the shots on nn sites are far more nasty than a softcore totally nude glamour shoot - funny how a little piece of white cotton fabric changes things for alot of people. reminds me of the teenage girls these days i read about who are engaging in anal sex and still consider themselves 'virgins' .

              Sexual in nature isn't a term in the 2257 law. 'Sexually explicit' is what it says. I really don't think most nn sites fall under 2257 - if there is simulated or real masturbation, yes, if her hand is down her panties and she appears to be playing with herself then that definitely falls under 2257 requirements, panties or no panties.
              I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!

              Comment

              • TheWildcard
                So Fucking Banned
                • Jun 2004
                • 4759

                #8
                Originally posted by Soul_Rebel
                no nude
                no sex
                = you dont have
                What he said.

                Comment

                • Living For Today
                  Confirmed User
                  • Feb 2002
                  • 3970

                  #9
                  Some nn sites are very explicit in nature so I would have to say it does apply.

                  Comment

                  • Dirty F
                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                    • Jul 2001
                    • 59204

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Mutt
                    interesting - i was just telling somebody yesterday that many of the shots on nn sites are far more nasty than a softcore totally nude glamour shoot - funny how a little piece of white cotton fabric changes things for alot of people. reminds me of the teenage girls these days i read about who are engaging in anal sex and still consider themselves 'virgins' .

                    Virgin anal teens - that turns me on for a reason.

                    Comment

                    • dready
                      Confirmed User
                      • Oct 2002
                      • 5247

                      #11
                      You still have to make a 2257 exemption statement.
                      ICQ: 91139591

                      Comment

                      • HairToStay
                        Confirmed User
                        • Oct 2002
                        • 1521

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Mutt

                        Sexual in nature isn't a term in the 2257 law. 'Sexually explicit' is what it says. I really don't think most nn sites fall under 2257 - if there is simulated or real masturbation, yes, if her hand is down her panties and she appears to be playing with herself then that definitely falls under 2257 requirements, panties or no panties.
                        If she's not showing any pubes, you're ok.

                        Under 18 USC 2256 ....

                        (2)

                        ''sexually explicit conduct'' means actual or simulated -

                        (A)

                        sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex;

                        (B)

                        bestiality;

                        (C)

                        masturbation;

                        (D)

                        sadistic or masochistic abuse; or

                        (E)

                        lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person;
                        Make bank by giving your surfers free pics every day and it costs you NOTHING! Use POTD Sponsors to find adult sponsors in more than 75 niches who offer a POTD feature!

                        Comment

                        • CJswe
                          Confirmed User
                          • Jul 2004
                          • 129

                          #13
                          The new rules are a beauty for us outside the US, all persons I have discussed this with(I study commercial law) claim that since hosts can't be blamed, we can still host over there but not worry about at thing. its all about nationality. maybe time will prove us wrong, and by then we'll move. either way I feel sorry for you right now.
                          Erotikpalatset.com - Swedes do it better
                          Street69.com - Where did your wife go last night?
                          Sexyvidz.com - Coming soon to a computer near YOU

                          Comment

                          Working...