for a site like www.tiffanyteen.com?
Do you need to comply with the 2257 for a nn site?
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
-
hmm i thought you would do as although they are nonnude the sites are clearly sexual in nature, and a girl spreading her legs with the camera zoomed in on her underwear would probably require 2257. i hope it would, because otherwise that would make it totally legal for a site of someone underage to exist that was nonnude - so, surely 2257 appliesComment
-
interesting - i was just telling somebody yesterday that many of the shots on nn sites are far more nasty than a softcore totally nude glamour shoot - funny how a little piece of white cotton fabric changes things for alot of people. reminds me of the teenage girls these days i read about who are engaging in anal sex and still consider themselves 'virgins' .Originally posted by a1ka1ine
hmm i thought you would do as although they are nonnude the sites are clearly sexual in nature, and a girl spreading her legs with the camera zoomed in on her underwear would probably require 2257. i hope it would, because otherwise that would make it totally legal for a site of someone underage to exist that was nonnude - so, surely 2257 applies
Sexual in nature isn't a term in the 2257 law. 'Sexually explicit' is what it says. I really don't think most nn sites fall under 2257 - if there is simulated or real masturbation, yes, if her hand is down her panties and she appears to be playing with herself then that definitely falls under 2257 requirements, panties or no panties.I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!Comment
-
-
-
Virgin anal teens - that turns me on for a reason.Originally posted by Mutt
interesting - i was just telling somebody yesterday that many of the shots on nn sites are far more nasty than a softcore totally nude glamour shoot - funny how a little piece of white cotton fabric changes things for alot of people. reminds me of the teenage girls these days i read about who are engaging in anal sex and still consider themselves 'virgins' .
Comment
-
If she's not showing any pubes, you're ok.Originally posted by Mutt
Sexual in nature isn't a term in the 2257 law. 'Sexually explicit' is what it says. I really don't think most nn sites fall under 2257 - if there is simulated or real masturbation, yes, if her hand is down her panties and she appears to be playing with herself then that definitely falls under 2257 requirements, panties or no panties.
Under 18 USC 2256 ....
(2)
''sexually explicit conduct'' means actual or simulated -
(A)
sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex;
(B)
bestiality;
(C)
masturbation;
(D)
sadistic or masochistic abuse; or
(E)
lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person;Make bank by giving your surfers free pics every day and it costs you NOTHING! Use POTD Sponsors to find adult sponsors in more than 75 niches who offer a POTD feature!Comment
-
The new rules are a beauty for us outside the US, all persons I have discussed this with(I study commercial law) claim that since hosts can't be blamed, we can still host over there but not worry about at thing. its all about nationality. maybe time will prove us wrong, and by then we'll move. either way I feel sorry for you right now.Comment



Comment