GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Why is it cool for Playboy to contact 16 & 17 year olds and not the rest of you? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=333378)

Fletch XXX 07-29-2004 05:49 PM

Why is it cool for Playboy to contact 16 & 17 year olds and not the rest of you?
 
Why is that Hugh hefner can contact Rachel Hunter at 17 asking her to pose nude, and they can contact Hulk Hogans daughter at 16?

I dont understand the logic.

I know if I were Hulk Hogan i would be demanding an answer from Hugh Hefner of why he was contacting my daughter at 16 to pose nude, wouldnt you?

these questions get passed over on this board, but i am genuinely curious.

why is it that Hugh can do this and no others cannot?

imagine if Larry Flynt was contacting 16 year olds for Barely Legal

hahaha

robfantasy 07-29-2004 05:50 PM

fletch post pics of hulks daughter

Fletch XXX 07-29-2004 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by robfantasy
fletch post pics of hulks daughter
she is 16, i have no reason to

BVF 07-29-2004 05:51 PM

I know that people TALK a lot of bullshit but when it comes up, they end up doing what anybody else would do...This is why I don't put on any false pretenses. It's easier that way.

NickPapageorgio 07-29-2004 05:52 PM

Maybe Hugh just has that more "Grandfatherly" look to him. He looks more trustworthy maybe. All the dads are just like, "Aww, well he looks like grandpa, we can trust him"

Flynt on the other hand has more of a Jabba The Hut appeal that I don't think comes off so well.

In all honestly, I don't know the answer but it's a good question. One would think the answer would be Money Talks but Flynt has plenty of that so that can't be it. Maybe free trips for dad to the mansion?

fr8 07-29-2004 05:53 PM

Hugh did everything he could to not get cought up in anything. Flynt just did what he could to make more money. And made some great choices but his choices pissed people off. So no one messes with hugh.

C_U_Next_Tuesday 07-29-2004 05:53 PM

hef just remeinds me of a dirty old man now.. that entourage of scary looking platinum freaks scares me enough as it is.

If it was Larry, you know what would happen.. too many people idolize Hef and think he never does wrong.

slapass 07-29-2004 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fletch XXX
Why is that Hugh hefner can contact Rachel Hunter at 17 asking her to pose nude, and they can contact Hulk Hogans daughter at 16?

I dont understand the logic.

I know if I were Hulk Hogan i would be demanding an answer from Hugh Hefner of why he was contacting my daughter at 16 to pose nude, wouldnt you?

these questions get passed over on this board, but i am genuinely curious.

why is it that Hugh can do this and no others cannot?

imagine if Larry Flynt was contacting 16 year olds for Barely Legal

hahaha

I thought they had only one underager person in playboy? It was centerfold. I do not beleive Rachel Hunter posed nude at 17 or the Hulk's daughter at 16. Can you reference the issue or something?

Fletch XXX 07-29-2004 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BVF
I know that people TALK a lot of bullshit but when it comes up, they end up doing what anybody else would do...This is why I don't put on any false pretenses. It's easier that way.
thats cool, ill give you that, youve never pretended thats for sure.

i am genuinely curious about this is all.

this isnt you BVF, no offense, im talking about Playboy contacting people, this is a bit different dont you think?

As I said, imagine if Larry Flynt was trying to get Olsen Twins for Barely Legal at 16?

the shit would hit the fan no?

DarkJedi 07-29-2004 05:55 PM

why indeed ?

Fletch XXX 07-29-2004 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by slapass
I thought they had only one underager person in playboy? It was centerfold. I do not beleive Rachel Hunter posed nude at 17 or the Hulk's daughter at 16. Can you reference the issue or something?
I did not say anyone posed nude.

They were contacted, in Rachel Hunters interview she turned them down told she was going to wait until 18. Probably PARENTING

Hulk Hogans daughter, same thing, not allowed to pose until 18 but contacted at 16.

why?

Elli 07-29-2004 05:55 PM

Playboy is seen as classy and a good reference even, and it's not something that a girl would want or have to hide later on. Hustler or Penthouse or whatever is not quite so respectable, though. :2 cents:

SirSmokeALot 07-29-2004 05:56 PM

I dont care who was contacting my daughter at 16. The man better be willing to lose his life for asking.:ak47:

jimmyf 07-29-2004 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by robfantasy
fletch post pics of hulks daughter
I saw her on TV, some talk show and she looks pretty dam good

Spunky 07-29-2004 05:57 PM

That is really surprising...When they roll into town looking for models..they must have 1000 babes wanting to pose for them

Fletch XXX 07-29-2004 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Elli
Playboy is seen as classy and a good reference even, and it's not something that a girl would want or have to hide later on. Hustler or Penthouse or whatever is not quite so respectable, though. :2 cents:
its because of this lie that you women believe this shit.

hahaha

they think its classy and all that, bullshit, my girlfriend KNOWs a Playmayte (highschool friend turned model), nothing highclass about it, they are still sluts, and they still suck off camera men.

NickPapageorgio 07-29-2004 05:58 PM

Well, in a weird sort of way it's no different than a baseball scout contacting a guy on the highschool team about coming to spring tryouts...sort of. I mean as long as they aren't posing under 18, and he goes through the right channels (i.e. Contacting the parents first and all parties are in agreement on said issue) I don't see where it's that big a deal.

NickPapageorgio 07-29-2004 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NickPapageorgio
Well, in a weird sort of way it's no different than a baseball scout contacting a guy on the highschool team about coming to spring tryouts...sort of. I mean as long as they aren't posing under 18, and he goes through the right channels (i.e. Contacting the parents first and all parties are in agreement on said issue) I don't see where it's that big a deal.
And I guess to the magazine guys, having the next, or the freshest, or the hottest, or the youngest looking is where they see their bottom line existing so they take whatever steps they think they have to to ensure they get the next fish first.

Elli 07-29-2004 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fletch XXX
its because of this lie that you women believe this shit.

hahaha

they think its classy and all that, bullshit, my girlfriend KNOWs a Playmayte (highschool friend turned model), nothing highclass about it, they are still sluts, and they still suck off camera men.

People treat their opportunities differently. I'm referring to the organization itself, not the slutty models it hires.

Fletch XXX 07-29-2004 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Elli
People treat their opportunities differently. I'm referring to the organization itself, not the slutty models it hires.
well you were saying that Hustler is low class and not respectable, i dont understand.

smut is smut.

Triple 6 07-29-2004 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Elli
Playboy is seen as classy and a good reference even, and it's not something that a girl would want or have to hide later on. Hustler or Penthouse or whatever is not quite so respectable, though. :2 cents:

C_U_Next_Tuesday 07-29-2004 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NickPapageorgio
Well, in a weird sort of way it's no different than a baseball scout contacting a guy on the highschool team about coming to spring tryouts...sort of. I mean as long as they aren't posing under 18, and he goes through the right channels (i.e. Contacting the parents first and all parties are in agreement on said issue) I don't see where it's that big a deal.
If a guy was trying to get my daughter to pose nude when she turned 18 in a few months.. I would hurt the fucking predator..there are enough 18 year olds ready and willing.

Fletch XXX 07-29-2004 06:02 PM

you think Hugh never gets his cock waxed by the new girls?

hahaha

him and Larry Flynt fuck all the girls, we know this!

Elli 07-29-2004 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fletch XXX
well you were saying that Hustler is low class and not respectable, i dont understand.

smut is smut.

I disagree. When you compare the calibre of the articles and supporting features, the photography, and the overall production value, I think Playboy comes out on top pretty much every time (from the issues I've seen). Also, models use their Playboy experience to further their career (Pamela, etc etc), but not nearly as many girls on tv or in movies brag about being a Penthouse Pet or Huster whatever.

Fletch XXX 07-29-2004 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by C_U_Next_Tuesday
If a guy was trying to get my daughter to pose nude when she turned 18 in a few months.. I would hurt the fucking predator..there are enough 18 year olds ready and willing.
these people dont understand.

because of WHo it is, they give extra courtesy, but if it was Steve Lightspeed contacting 16 year olds they would be thread about him and his pedo shit. (i am NOT SAYING ANYTHING NEGATIVE ABOUT STEVE OR LS)

NickPapageorgio 07-29-2004 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by C_U_Next_Tuesday
If a guy was trying to get my daughter to pose nude when she turned 18 in a few months.. I would hurt the fucking predator..there are enough 18 year olds ready and willing.
Oh I totally agree but I am sure there are some out there who wouldn't. I can't imagine the state of the Playboy rep's face that contacts my daughter at 16 lol...It will not be pretty.

badmunchkin 07-29-2004 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NickPapageorgio
Maybe Hugh just has that more "Grandfatherly" look to him. He looks more trustworthy maybe. All the dads are just like, "Aww, well he looks like grandpa, we can trust him"

Flynt on the other hand has more of a Jabba The Hut appeal that I don't think comes off so well.

LMAO - "Jabba The Hut appeal"
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Fletch XXX 07-29-2004 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Elli
I disagree. When you compare the calibre of the articles and supporting features, the photography, and the overall production value, I think Playboy comes out on top pretty much every time (from the issues I've seen). Also, models use their Playboy experience to further their career (Pamela, etc etc), but not nearly as many girls on tv or in movies brag about being a Penthouse Pet or Huster whatever.
a person contacting a 16 year old to pose nude has NOTHING TO DO WITH THE PRETTY ARTICLES they put next to her pics.

I am sure when Hugh says "call and get the Hulks 16 year old daughter on line 3) that is what he is thinking. Lets take pics of this cute girl so she can be next to this weeks recipe and cocktail artcile.

gimme a break Elli, think past the fodder and glamour./

jonesy 07-29-2004 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fletch XXX
Why is that Hugh hefner can contact Rachel Hunter at 17 asking her to pose nude, and they can contact Hulk Hogans daughter at 16?

I dont understand the logic.

why is it that Hugh can do this and no others cannot?

imagine if Larry Flynt was contacting 16 year olds for Barely Legal

you of all people have to ask why?

Fletch XXX 07-29-2004 06:07 PM

i love how Hugh has his shit branded though.

Even the sluts who pose think its some glamourous thing and look at how beautiful I am.

look at all the playmates who have come and gone, how many are rich and glamourous now?

Hugh has marketed it so well, he has every girl in america damn near waiting to pose thinking it will jump start some model career.

"sure thing honey, like weve never seen a blonde as cute as you before."

:1orglaugh

Fletch XXX 07-29-2004 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jonesy
you of all people have to ask why?
just trying to get a good thread rolling before i leave the house.

:1orglaugh

Elli 07-29-2004 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fletch XXX
a person contacting a 16 year old to pose nude has NOTHING TO DO WITH THE PRETTY ARTICLES they put next to her pics.

I am sure when Hugh says "call and get the Hulks 16 year old daughter on line 3) that is what he is thinking. Lets take pics of this cute girl so she can be next to this weeks recipe and cocktail artcile.

gimme a break Elli, think past the fodder and glamour./

They're not asking to shoot her while she's still underage. They're saying they would like the "scoop" when she does reach 18. They're not asking her to have hardcore gangbangs on film or anything. It's posing nude or semi-nude when she's already 18. Obviously it's the parent's perogative to turn away the offer at the door. My advice to a daughter would be to wait. Hold on to that thought and get to at least 20 before she decides what she wants to do about it.

Fletch XXX 07-29-2004 06:10 PM

for the record before i roll out.

i dont care how young the girls are people contact, its up to them and their company.

i was just curiious to what others thought....

rolling out now to meet a drug dealer!!!!!

I AM A CRIMINAL WHO AM I TO QUESTION CAMERA GUYS???

hahaha

:thumbsup

Fletch XXX 07-29-2004 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Elli
They're not asking to shoot her while she's still underage. They're saying they would like the "scoop" when she does reach 18. They're not asking her to have hardcore gangbangs on film or anything.
nor is Lightspeed!

So why doesnt Steve Lightspeed contact 16 year olds?

because its not right, and he has morals?

As i said, its up to the people to think for themselves.

all i try to do is get people thinking... looks like it works most of the time Elli ;)

:thumbsup

genomega 07-29-2004 06:12 PM

Hugh is not running the operation, his daughter has been in charge for years.

:)

Elli 07-29-2004 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fletch XXX
nor is Lightspeed!

So why doesnt Steve Lightspeed contact 16 year olds?

because its not right, and he has morals?

As i said, its up to the people to think for themselves.

all i try to do is get people thinking... looks like it works most of the time Elli ;)

:thumbsup

Most of the time :winkwink:

cherrylula 07-29-2004 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Elli
I disagree. When you compare the calibre of the articles and supporting features, the photography, and the overall production value, I think Playboy comes out on top pretty much every time (from the issues I've seen). Also, models use their Playboy experience to further their career (Pamela, etc etc), but not nearly as many girls on tv or in movies brag about being a Penthouse Pet or Huster whatever.
Thats right. Everyone knows all 16 year old girls should look up to the image of a Playboy model. ;)

Bleach blonde hair, lots of plastic surgery, and don't forget the tan.

Playboy has some of the fakest looking models around. Its very plastic and very Hollywood. But yes, it will help a girl further her career if they plan on being a plastic bimbo on tv. :1orglaugh

Shoehorn! 07-29-2004 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BVF
I know that people TALK a lot of bullshit but when it comes up, they end up doing what anybody else would do...This is why I don't put on any false pretenses. It's easier that way.
You seem to be a straight shooter, I like that, for what it's worth. :2 cents:

sherie 07-29-2004 06:21 PM

I have never seen any threads pertaining to this. I too would like to know the answer to this question...is it allowed because it's considered art? I do believe that there have been actresses as well that have been nude in movies under the age of 18.

InsaneMidget 07-29-2004 06:22 PM

I think it's wrong. There are plenty of girls 18+ to simply ask or atleast wait until they turn 18 and they aren't kids anymore.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123