does 2257 = the end of Girls Gone Wild?
 

They won't possibly be able to show ID for all the girls in their videos.

Example: A girl that flashes up on balcony.

wow good question, but there still is the public outdoor issue

A girl flashing her tits I dont know if that can be considered hardcore sexual content. A girl just smiling nude doesnt require 2257 that probably wouldnt either.

serious?

softcore porn = no 2257?

OK, what about 2 naked girls on a boat rubbing themselves and licking tits?

yes that falls under the 2257 definition when you word it like that

from what I see in these new changes is video and magazine will do business as usual.. They are targeting the Internet from the looks of it.

The regulations don't say "hardcore". They say "explicit sexual content" and "actual sexual content".

imo, something can be "actually sexual" without having penetration (hardcore) ie: masturbation, oral sex, lesbian stuff, spread shots,etc.

bottom line is if they want to define it as sexually explicit, they can and will.

I'm sure they'll figure something out.

I just had dinner with their prodution manager and trust me . We are all working together to fight this shit Real Wild girl GGW and Dream girls . We wont go down we are all freinds now to fight this BS and we will prevail :)

not hardcore

Naked model doesn't need 2257.
Model touching herself, on up, needs 2257.
Also, good rule of thumb...If you're not sure if it's sexually explicit or not, get the 2257 info and file it.

Flashing ones tits is not sexuallly explicit flashing them and then fondling them is sexually explicit.