somethng just occured to me about the new 2257
 

You have to have a link on every page featuring content linking to a central page with 2257 info right? Will TGPs and link lIsts add one more link to be allowed per page? That will count as a link. Will people get banned for adding links to this central page to old pages?

good question




juicy, would you like to comment/?

Has the DOJ EVER done a 2257 compliance check on any site of note? Is there a good reason to think that they will? I find it hard to believe that they will pay people to scan the internet looking for someone who forgot to put a 2257 link at the bottom of one of his pages and then throw their ass in the slammer.

What about broken links?

I just sent in my resume. Hopefully I will be hired right around august.

Well correct me if I am wrong but aren't galleries NOW suspose to have a 2257 link? This is not a new law but just revised (and the revision has not passed yet)

Shane

The old version was unclear on whom a producer was so your answer would be no and yes. If back then you thought you were the producer then yes, if you felt that the person who shot the content was the producer then no.

Wrong. Read the fucking regs.

Correct. :thumbsup

fucking post a fucking link.

Ah...but either way there still should be a link to the 2257 declaration....Even if it just pointed to the producer of the content.

type 2257 into your google tool bar. Click second link.

OMG stop already

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

:helpme

The link has been posted here at least 30 times in the last 2 days.

Well technically a hardcore banner also would need a 2257 under current law. Yet as I said the term producer was to vague.