Fox News - They're talking about Internet Porn
 

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

I'm still trying to figure why they call them "dirty" pictures?

They look clean to me.

:1orglaugh

LOL now they're showing porn sites blurred out.

SmutLand.com just got on there.

Swiching to fox now...

fox is greedy for ratings

"They have favored smut peddlers over children"... WTF?

damn right wing news station

http://www.moveon.org/mediacorps/fox...3qhEJgqpW.hwWA

"MoveOn.org Launches Online Fox Watch Group to Track Fox News's Partisan Bias

WASHINGTON, DC -- The wall between objective journalism and partisan politicking at Fox News fell last week when it became clear that Fox News staff contributed to the orchestration of the Republican-led 39-hour Senate talk-a-thon intended to counter the Democrat filibuster against four of President Bush's most radically conservative judicial nominees."

:1orglaugh

This was a left wing sponsored bill.... genius.

This old bitch talking now is a total fucking idiot.

Saying we're trying to sell porn to kids.

Dumb ass.

we're ruining tomorrow's youth...

Priceless exposure.:2 cents:

I see her... she's a stupid ass.

somebody should call them up and methion that kids dont have credit cards and that thier parents should be there when they are online. They shouldnt be wasting thier time bitching at us because their children beat off to porn.

Most parents use PC's and Playstations as babysitters and hardly interact with their kids. That's the biggest problem of all.

Fox News and porn. Like any other day in Los Angeles!

Once again.... trying to regulate the internet... Whether its music or porn... the government wants a piece.... I'm Republican... but seriously...

Fuckin AMEN KRL..... Just ask my sisters son who is "addicted". My son is 16 months and I spend 13 hours a day with him.... I don't want him like that.
:2 cents:

The goverment should just stay away from it all, they only fuck things up. Good examples are can spam and this new bill for spyware. It only requires that you let people know its there and what it does. But most programs already have you agree to thier terms but nobody ever reads them. All this bill will do is give the spyware companies protection. It may stop a few of the drive by spamware but not enough to help :(

:1orglaugh

They're going to be talking about the case on the Abrams report on MSNBC in a few......if you want to watch that and compare to the Faux.....errrr.....Fox report.

The one conservative guy's biggest point was that kids are smart and they will get around the filters, so the gov. can't use technology and has to prosecute people that put up the content.

If the kids are so smart then it won't matter that free hardcore porn is outlawed just in the USA since they will be able to EASILY find it on non-US sites!

Maybe in a couple years the USA will block ALL access to non-US web sites, that will be the ONLY way to stop kids from getting to non-us free hardcore porn sites if it is outlawed in the US. Fuckin idiots.
:mad:

the key is to make it look like they're doing something...

gotta show the voters and donators that they're moving off their asses

Yeah, it's the fucking parents fault, they would rather push the blame off on somebody else rather than take responsibility for themselves and do something about it. :BangBang:

That lady was a tool.
When the guy from the other side said that 40% of these sites are in other countries and a U.S. law wouldn't affect them she said
"You're assuming those other sites won't use the age verification"
and
"If we get 60% that's a good start"

What a fucking dumb ass....they're obviously religious zealots just out to stick it to pornographers, if they really cared about their kids they'd use filtering software AND supervise their children when they surf the web.

:2 cents:

This same biatch with her painted on eyebrows was on the MSNBC report to.
This idiot thinks that the law would apply to foreign websites and the US government would be able to prosecute European website owners under the law since it doesn't contain an exemption for foreign webistes.
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

On another note, the MSNBC report was much better and seemed to represent both sides fairly.
:2 cents:

here is a thought for everyone who has a domain. The Domains are run by US companies for the most part, and it was US govt who started the net. Ifthe US govt wants to shut down a foreign companies website. They could get an prosecution of the company, if the person did not show up from the foreign land to defend themselves in US court thent he court could order the seizure of the domain name.. and Poof there goes yoru site.

Sure there goes your site, and that's a big IF.

But this woman was referring to citizens of other countries being subject to the $50,000 fines and jail time for breaking a U.S. law.

That's total bullshit of course, she just didn't have a good response when Abrams told her this wouldn't stop porn from Europe or anywhere else outside the U.S.

Another point Lars.

Aren't co.uk, .ca, etc. domains under the jurisdiction of their respective governments and not the U.S.?

In that case the only way the gov't could stop porn on those domains would be to block U.S. users from accessing them, in which case the argument goes back to filtering at the client level as opposed to verification at the server level.

:2 cents:

She also looks like she hasn't gotten laid in 50 years.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Content filtering is pretty easy. If kids are smart enough to get around that then they are smart enough to handle a bit of smut. After all, what prepubescent boy do you know that isn't actively trying to find some smut? I haven't met one yet.