GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Bloodless, 20-Minute HIV Tests OKd for Wider Use (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=318109)

just a punk 06-26-2004 11:15 AM

Bloodless, 20-Minute HIV Tests OKd for Wider Use
 
SHERMAN OAKS, Calif. ? In a decision that may help the porn industry, the Bush administration said Friday that it will permit wider use of an oral test for the AIDS virus that gives results in 20 minutes. Full Story...

Would you use it?

kmanrox 06-26-2004 11:18 AM

i sell these wholesale/whitelabel.. inquire within.

kmanrox 06-26-2004 11:21 AM

but i must say... they are stupid to use for porn actors as they arent as accurate as PCR/DNA tests, or sensitive. PCR DNA can detect exposure/contraction within hours/days of contact... the home hiv kits are like regular blood tests and usually are only good from 3 months prior...

SykkBoy 06-26-2004 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by kmanrox
i sell these wholesale/whitelabel.. inquire within.
I'll be hitting you up shortly

Sarah_Jayne 06-26-2004 01:15 PM

I can't help but worry about HIV testing with out a professional there to support someone who as tested postive.

clickhappy 06-26-2004 01:16 PM

If theres no hiv in saliva, and you're not testing blood, then how do these tests work?
I mean is there hiv floating around the mouth of an hiv infected person?

WarChild 06-26-2004 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by clickhappy
If theres no hiv in saliva, and you're not testing blood, then how do these tests work?
I mean is there hiv floating around the mouth of an hiv infected person?

Isn't it true that there are trace amounts of the virus in saliva, but there have been no cases reported of trasnfer via saliva.

I think that's right.

M_M 06-26-2004 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by clickhappy
If theres no hiv in saliva, and you're not testing blood, then how do these tests work?
I mean is there hiv floating around the mouth of an hiv infected person?


now they're going, "oh shit, we didn't think about that"

Rich 06-26-2004 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sarah_webinc
I can't help but worry about HIV testing with out a professional there to support someone who as tested postive.
I agree with you 100%, I only see increased problems with this.

clickhappy 06-26-2004 01:31 PM

I thought hiv can only be transmitted through blood, semen, pussy juice (whatever the medical term is for it) and breast milk.
Theres none of that in a clean mouth.

Michaelious 06-26-2004 01:47 PM

yeah i'd use it if i had too, i don't see the prob. They are 99% accurate. better than condoms that only work 94% of the time

sexsup 06-26-2004 01:55 PM

If it gives good results why not?

Libertine 06-26-2004 01:56 PM

For all those of you talking about saliva not containing the virus:

Quote:

OraQuick, manufactured by OraSure Technologies Inc., does not require blood.

With OraQuick, a technician wipes a treated cotton swab along the gums, picking up not saliva but cells lining the mouth.
Next time, at least read the article before asking dumb questions :glugglug

just a punk 06-26-2004 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by clickhappy
I thought hiv can only be transmitted through blood, semen, pussy juice (whatever the medical term is for it) and breast milk.
Theres none of that in a clean mouth.

The concentration of HIV in saliva and sweat is not enough to infect another person. So don't worry about it ;) However HIV contains in ANY physiological liquid of infected person. So it is possible to detect HIV even by means of testing saliva. BTW, these methods are grounded on detecting the antibodies to HIV but not the HIV itself.

just a punk 06-26-2004 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Michaelious
yeah i'd use it if i had too, i don't see the prob. They are 99% accurate. better than condoms that only work 94% of the time
Yes, thses 6% mean that your condom may be broken during sex... I.e. only 94 or 100 condoms will remain undamaged... Think of it :Graucho

On the other hand, I'd say it's better to use BOTH protections since 0.9988% (94% of 99%) is much better!

just a punk 06-26-2004 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rich
I agree with you 100%, I only see increased problems with this.
IMHO unlikely


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123