![]() |
Solo Girl sites, how much content is enough? (pics)
We found some pretty good girls recently.
http://www.paulmarkham.com/temp/cast3.jpg http://www.paulmarkham.com/temp/cast5.jpg And had an enquiry from someone thinking about starting up a solo girl site with them, we've already shot them solo, together and with their boyfriends. So how much content is enough for a solo girl site? |
I remember seeing the first pic before here.
The amount of content I always suggest to chicks asking me about starting their own sites is: at least 1000 pics, 10-15 video clips, and some extra content. I AM working in a different niche than these girls though. So maybe you'd want to triple that number? |
5000-10,000 images with about 50 video clips seems to satisfy most surfers and is a good starting point especially if the membership price is $25-$29.00.
|
Quote:
The first one is the best looking and the best model, but the second one is good and did a nice B/G set. http://www.paulmarkham.com/temp/phone2.jpg http://www.paulmarkham.com/temp/phone3.jpg Will have way over 1,000 pics of them and probably 10-15 15 to 20 minute videos of them as well. But will shoot a bit more to be safe. |
nice, hookdick....
|
Need a good 25-30 sets to open. Sets of 75-100 pics are great and they should have 10-15 videos with about 5-10 minutes of play time each.
Then, if you like most update every week you should have another 50-70 sets on hand and at least 12 more videos. That should get you through the first year. Stock up on content though. Solo site models flake hardcore. To play it safe you might want to think about doubling the numbers above. Ronnie |
Quote:
What if they link the two sites together, via the sets/videos where they are fucking eachother, and charge one price for the two sites? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think his number was good, but for the close of the first year. :) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think the most we ever shot a girl here was 15 times. And she was Eva and my GF, had a good reason to like her. :Graucho I will tell my client, 10 days, 6 sets and 4 videos a day plus all we have of her already. No one picked up on my idea of linking the two sites via the sets where theye fucked each other. Would that work??? |
Quote:
Combining them into one site might be ok, but both of these girls seem strong enough to carry their own sites. If they dont have a ton of content just make it a 19.95 join or something with a 4.95 3 day trial to the second site. If the upsell converts into a full sale, thats a 45.00 signup. That would work. |
First enough looks awesome:thumbsup
|
Quote:
|
both girls are cute:winkwink:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Solo sites are kinda like a cd put out by your favorite group. You never really know what song is going to be the "hit" before its released. It seems to me that the more solo sites you offer in chain increases the chances on a hit. Then, if the site does less then expected you still have tons of options such as upsells and members area sharing and feeder traffic for other solo sites in your chain. |
Damn, those girls are hot! :thumbsup
|
Quote:
Is that one girl Veronika? |
Some great info in here boys :)
Thanks |
Quote:
way overkill. if all you have is 5000-10K total pix and 50 vid clips you maximize your ROI by putting them on a content management script and start with 2000 pix and 10 vids, and weekly update to the next 2000 pix, next 10 vids, so that you work thru all your avail inventory over 60-90 days (which will be average retention). use java scripts to automatically change your tour daily, or upon each refresh. criteria should be quality, not quantity. i.e.: wifeysworld.com, etc. |
another point often overlooked.
know where your surfers are coming from. if it is north america male models should be circumcized for best conversions. if euro is your market, males should be uncircumcized. |
Quote:
Thanks again for the info, could see a solo site being a lot of trouble for us and puts the girl in control. If she decides she wants more money you're fucked. |
More pics are needed in this thread to give you any real feedback. :Graucho
|
Quote:
http://www.paulmarkham.com/temp/phone.jpg http://www.paulmarkham.com/temp/dp.jpg Will have some more of the other girl Monday. We shot them both together for a custom/exclusive client Friday. Don't know if I should post his pics here. |
HOT HOT :thumbsup :thumbsup :thumbsup
|
they are cute both :thumbsup
|
Quote:
|
They are cute looking girls, but I wouldn't use them as is for solo sites. Take that last pic: she has two vibrators in her, but to look at the expression on her face, you would think she was posing for her year book. The near-oral shot higher up is the same: just too stiff (no pun intended) and posed.
At least based on this (admittedly small) selection of pics, there is no real action or passion evident. I would expect surfers to get bored with them very quickly. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I went to your site and saw what you meant by stiff posing and a lack of action on your tour pages. Your site would send a stiff one limp any time. Also please warn people you run pop up hell from your sites. :321GFY |
Pics are real cute but for solo girl sites , the surfer wants someone who is real that they can bond to.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:56 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123