![]() |
Which design is better? A, B or C?
In a previous thread [link], i matched up designs
A: http://www.angelmovies.net/design.shtml B: http://www.angelmovies.net/designb.shtml the problem was, A looked better (to me at least) but i had no where of putting the movie links.. at least in a logical fashion. B appeared to take up too much room vertically, have less thumbs, and maybe the text for the movies was too small (or is it?) nevertheless, i created C: http://www.angelmovies.net/designc.shtml problem with C is ive abandoned the 90x120 thumbs for the 88x88.. what do you suggest i do? which design is the best? will the change to smaller thumbs affect my productivity a lot? |
Out of A and B, I liked B best, and C looked almost the same as B to me, so I'd say C.
|
G for Giorgio.
|
bump
|
I like B because I dont like the thumb size of C. A I just dont like.
|
b
|
B)
|
b
|
A :thumbsup
|
any others?
|
b
|
but doesnt each day take up too much room? vertically that is..
|
They all suck and the Flems lost..change your sig or wake up
|
Quote:
dick up your ass or something? |
C looks best to me... :2 cents:
mC |
its a conversation between A & B .... C yourself out !
so B wins the battle |
My vote is for "C".
|
B :thumbsup
|
more please
|
I chose D
|
Quote:
youre a fucking idiot |
lol
|
I like b best.
Are you gonna have all seven days? A hof? |
Quote:
|
So that's 165 thumbs, and around 200 if you do a hof. Plus your text links. If you think the size is too big, knock a row off each day. That still leaves you with 135 thumbs, 150 with a hof. That seems like it would be plenty, to me. It looks like you'll have archives, as well.
|
b
|
so were settled on b?
|
c
|
I like C.
|
They look good and I vote for B
|
I think B looks the best. It elongates the page, where C's design looks very boxy...unappealing to me.
|
B
|
so were going with B?
should i place the big thumb in the middle or on the top left? |
oO
|
b will generate the most clicks
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
:angrysoap
This is a perfect example of why so many people fail in this business... The question isn't which one looks better. The question SHOULD be which one will be the most productive in terms of traffic and sales. Almost all the top sites look like "crap" or are extremely plain. The ones that don't are usually ones fed traffic by the other ones or are paying for traffic. Get out now if you don't understand this. |
Quote:
finally, someone who understands it. some of the top converting sites look like shit. beautiful, gimmicky, flashy, slick, airbrushed beauty does not necessarily = $ in your pocket. |
Hey Myst....
Hit me up on icq or aim.....I have some work for you! |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123