Looks Like 'PEDO' shit to me.. bastards

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 995Pays_Webmaster
    Registered User
    • Jun 2004
    • 63

    #1

    Looks Like 'PEDO' shit to me.. bastards

    Check this page I saw on the hun

    http://www.hyperfree.com/amateur/sexyaction/2/

    Look at the bottom banner, shit looks like 'pedo' crap
    to me and CCBill allows this shit.


    Crazy ass world we live in.
    www.995PAYS.com
    Free Content, Hosted Galleries and more! Promote a $9.95 site that retains better then 60%!!!
  • MattO
    The O is for Oohhh
    • Feb 2003
    • 10861

    #2
    if you think it's something illegal, don't make a link to it goddammit

    Comment

    • llabtaem
      Confirmed User
      • Feb 2004
      • 969

      #3
      That's Met-Art Photography. Their 2257 is here: http://www.met-art.com/disclaimer.htm


      "MET-ART.com - DISCLAIMER:
      All models displayed on the site are 18 years or older. The owners and operators of this Website are not the primary producer (as that term is defined in 18 USC section 2257) of any of the visual content contained in the Website. MET ART works closely with several American Lawyers. They work and review this site on a daily basis, to make sure it always complies with US Laws. MET ART is located in the USA, hosted in the USA, billed in the USA, has been operating for 6 years now. MET ART is certified by the compliance dep. of: CCBILL, PayPal and IBill, all three are US based companies.

      The Custodian of Records for this Website is: S. Lawrence
      ESQ. PO box 2377
      New York, N.Y 10185 "

      Not even like it's purchased or home produced content. It's marked.

      Comment

      • CyberBachelor
        Confirmed User
        • Jun 2003
        • 2682

        #4
        Originally posted by MattO
        if you think it's something illegal, don't make a link to it goddammit
        .....................................

        Comment

        • nastyking
          • Nov 2002
          • 2174

          #5
          http://web.archive.org/web/200102030...disclaimer.htm

          Comment

          • Samantha_Luvcox
            Confirmed User
            • Sep 2002
            • 396

            #6
            Originally posted by llabtaem
            That's Met-Art Photography. Their 2257 is here: http://www.met-art.com/disclaimer.htm


            "MET-ART.com - DISCLAIMER:
            All models displayed on the site are 18 years or older. The owners and operators of this Website are not the primary producer (as that term is defined in 18 USC section 2257) of any of the visual content contained in the Website. MET ART works closely with several American Lawyers. They work and review this site on a daily basis, to make sure it always complies with US Laws. MET ART is located in the USA, hosted in the USA, billed in the USA, has been operating for 6 years now. MET ART is certified by the compliance dep. of: CCBILL, PayPal and IBill, all three are US based companies.

            The Custodian of Records for this Website is: S. Lawrence
            ESQ. PO box 2377
            New York, N.Y 10185 "

            Not even like it's purchased or home produced content. It's marked.
            I didn't think you could use a PO box as your 2257 records address..
            SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.

            Comment

            • 995Pays_Webmaster
              Registered User
              • Jun 2004
              • 63

              #7
              Originally posted by Samantha_Luvcox
              I didn't think you could use a PO box as your 2257 records address..
              You can't , it is a requirement in the USA to
              have a physical address.

              Violation # 1 I would suppose
              www.995PAYS.com
              Free Content, Hosted Galleries and more! Promote a $9.95 site that retains better then 60%!!!

              Comment

              • ImLost
                Confirmed User
                • May 2004
                • 1900

                #8
                that isnt a MET art offical banner

                Comment

                • 995Pays_Webmaster
                  Registered User
                  • Jun 2004
                  • 63

                  #9
                  Originally posted by ImLost
                  that isnt a MET art offical banner
                  I did not think so either, its pretty iffy..
                  www.995PAYS.com
                  Free Content, Hosted Galleries and more! Promote a $9.95 site that retains better then 60%!!!

                  Comment

                  • stephthegeek
                    Registered User
                    • Mar 2004
                    • 402

                    #10
                    Aha, I was wondering when that crossover happened. I KNEW Met-Art didn't used to have anything about 18+ in their legal statements years ago... I thought it was still the same until about a year ago when I re-read it and it then it DID state 18+. I always forget about archive.org in times like these

                    I know this board is full of "pedo-vigilantes", so maybe it's just me, but I don't find anything wrong with the beautiful photos of Hamilton, Sturges, et al. I wonder why exactly MET changed their tune. I can buy Hamilton's books with naked adolescents in bookstores... it's not "kiddie porn".

                    Comment

                    • nastyking
                      • Nov 2002
                      • 2174

                      #11
                      Originally posted by stephthegeek

                      I know this board is full of "pedo-vigilantes", so maybe it's just me, but I don't find anything wrong with the beautiful photos of Hamilton, Sturges, et al. I wonder why exactly MET changed their tune. I can buy Hamilton's books with naked adolescents in bookstores... it's not "kiddie porn".
                      Do those bookstores advertise on hardcore pornography sites? Or can you buy Hamilton's books in your local porn store?

                      Comment

                      • stephthegeek
                        Registered User
                        • Mar 2004
                        • 402

                        #12
                        Originally posted by nastyking
                        Do those bookstores advertise on hardcore pornography sites? Or can you buy Hamilton's books in your local porn store?
                        True, but anything can be considered erotic to those who have an interest in it. Should the intention really take precedence over the content? Who really cares if it's jack-off material for hebephiles?

                        They're already trying to take away the artistic merit defence for nude art in Canada. I just hate to see these issues overriding freedom of expression.

                        Comment

                        • dig420
                          Confirmed User
                          • May 2001
                          • 9240

                          #13
                          Originally posted by nastyking
                          Do those bookstores advertise on hardcore pornography sites? Or can you buy Hamilton's books in your local porn store?
                          you're just seeing what's already in your mind...

                          Comment

                          • stephthegeek
                            Registered User
                            • Mar 2004
                            • 402

                            #14
                            Originally posted by nastyking
                            Do those bookstores advertise on hardcore pornography sites? Or can you buy Hamilton's books in your local porn store?
                            Although, as a side note, a lot of places are clearly catering to that market... many sites sell "nudist videos", preteen drawings, etc. right alongside Hamilton's books and movies.

                            Comment

                            • Spunky
                              I need a beer
                              • Jun 2002
                              • 133978

                              #15
                              That banner sure looks like it...those girls look 10 years old

                              Comment

                              • Alice22
                                Confirmed User
                                • Nov 2003
                                • 907

                                #16
                                There is some underage models on met art.
                                Exclusive Teen Solo girls and pregnant sites

                                Comment

                                • Shoplifter
                                  Richest man in Babylon
                                  • Jan 2002
                                  • 5856

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by Alice22
                                  There is some underage models on met art.

                                  I thought CCBill made them get rid of all of that. But yes, I can remember a few years back when they did and it was a topic every week.
                                  I Like Blondes

                                  Comment

                                  • DeadFidel
                                    Confirmed User
                                    • Jul 2003
                                    • 6764

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by Shoplifter
                                    I thought CCBill made them get rid of all of that. But yes, I can remember a few years back when they did and it was a topic every week.
                                    I have been running met-art banners on a few of my paysites for a couple of years and their rebill conversions are outstanding.
                                    I have made well over 100k from them.
                                    Now,...I only ran through the material once (way too comprehensive to see it all) and did see a few border line images, but nothing I would call CP.
                                    Now CCbill as good as they may be, makes exeptions as in this case. They also do not process celeb sites, but guess who Mr. "Hank" Skin uses?
                                    Double standards are welcomed when you bring in the big bank.

                                    Comment

                                    • Sony
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Dec 2002
                                      • 495

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by 995Pays_Webmaster
                                      Check this page I saw on the hun

                                      http://www.hyperfree.com/amateur/sexyaction/2/

                                      Look at the bottom banner, shit looks like 'pedo' crap
                                      to me and CCBill allows this shit.


                                      Crazy ass world we live in.
                                      Met-Art is not CP you fucktard. You try to damage their bussines with your retarded assumptions. Post proof or shut the fuck up.

                                      Comment

                                      • macker
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • Jul 2003
                                        • 2161

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by MattO
                                        if you think it's something illegal, don't make a link to it goddammit
                                        Well fucking said. Why people try and connect this board to anything that could even be remotely considered as illegal is beyond me.

                                        Lens, please start banning these idiots.

                                        ForcedMen | AsianViolation | WorkMyCock | TickleAsian | MasturbationInstructors | AssCleaners | TickleTorment | Fetish4Download (VOD) | PantyhosePlaza | FemaleDomination
                                        mick[at]fetishassets.com | ICQ: 395-117

                                        Comment

                                        • DatingGold
                                          $6 PER EMAIL JOiN
                                          • Feb 2003
                                          • 13185

                                          #21
                                          ccbill processes that?
                                          9 Years of SOLID payouts and conversions!



                                          ADULT DATING - $100 PPS

                                          LIVE CAMS - $214 PPS

                                          WWW.DATINGGOLD.COM

                                          ICQ: 27442303

                                          Comment

                                          • DeadFidel
                                            Confirmed User
                                            • Jul 2003
                                            • 6764

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by DatingGold
                                            ccbill processes that?
                                            I hope that was written rhetorically.

                                            Comment

                                            • s9ann0
                                              Confirmed User
                                              • Sep 2001
                                              • 4873

                                              #23
                                              I think it was mosteroticteens.com used to post pics that looked underage on my picture post years back and it never had the 18+ bit on it.

                                              Comment

                                              • LadyMischief
                                                Orgasms N Such!
                                                • Sep 2002
                                                • 18135

                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by Samantha_Luvcox
                                                I didn't think you could use a PO box as your 2257 records address..
                                                No, it has to be a physical address.

                                                ICQ 3522039
                                                Content Manager - orgasm.com
                                                [email protected]

                                                Comment

                                                • SpeakEasy
                                                  Confirmed User
                                                  • Sep 2002
                                                  • 2681

                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by DatingGold
                                                  ccbill processes that?
                                                  Their ethics have been questioned for years. They basically will do anything for $$
                                                  Check Your Internet Speed;
                                                  http://www.speakeasy.net/speedtest/

                                                  Comment

                                                  • cluck
                                                    Confirmed User
                                                    • Dec 2002
                                                    • 5248

                                                    #26
                                                    What's legal is legal. What's the difference between a 17 year old posing nude and an 18 year old posing nude? The legality, that's it.
                                                    icq 279990726
                                                    www.mcdonalds.com <- great money making opportunity

                                                    Comment

                                                    • Dawgy
                                                      Confirmed User
                                                      • Jul 2001
                                                      • 5856

                                                      #27
                                                      "little girls" is not appropriate text for a banner in this business
                                                      the revolution is coming.

                                                      Comment

                                                      • Fletch XXX
                                                        GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!!
                                                        • Jan 2002
                                                        • 60840

                                                        #28
                                                        im going to start using the term "little girls" on every page i push teens on!

                                                        yay! cany wait to see conversions go UP UP UP!!

                                                        you people pushing this shit this way know what you are doing and enjoy it.

                                                        "little girls" only means one thing.

                                                        i love how you guys cant stand bondage or anything fantasy but absolutely love 11 year old looking girls posing nude. Oh but its called "ART" all my years in art school never saw MET or nude teens as art.

                                                        disgusting.

                                                        Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site?

                                                        Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

                                                        Comment

                                                        • Fletch XXX
                                                          GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!!
                                                          • Jan 2002
                                                          • 60840

                                                          #29
                                                          "LITTLE GIRLS POSING NUDE IS NOT ART YOU FUCKING PEDOS"

                                                          Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site?

                                                          Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

                                                          Comment

                                                          • jigg
                                                            Confirmed User
                                                            • Feb 2002
                                                            • 2527

                                                            #30
                                                            Originally posted by Fletch XXX
                                                            "LITTLE GIRLS POSING NUDE IS NOT ART YOU FUCKING PEDOS"
                                                            ......
                                                            eight,eight,two,eight,eight,four,two
                                                            ......

                                                            Comment

                                                            • 995Pays_Webmaster
                                                              Registered User
                                                              • Jun 2004
                                                              • 63

                                                              #31
                                                              Originally posted by jigg
                                                              My point exactly.. and Fletch has the same views as me.

                                                              It's sick.. regardless of their exact known ages.

                                                              My point was a Banner representing Met-Art and
                                                              CCBill allowing its name 'titled' with such work
                                                              wether legal or not.

                                                              I don't know the age of the so called 'model' on this
                                                              banner, but I am assuming they are 'legal' since
                                                              Met-Art claims to have models over 18 y/o.

                                                              AND WE ALL KNOW THAT WHAT IS ON THE INTERNET IS
                                                              100% TRUE AND FACTUAL...ahahahha

                                                              If you think this you need


                                                              Oh, I am related to the late great Mr. Boku Mogkabetu
                                                              and I inherited $10,000,000 and I need your help!.. HA!!!!!!!!!!
                                                              www.995PAYS.com
                                                              Free Content, Hosted Galleries and more! Promote a $9.95 site that retains better then 60%!!!

                                                              Comment

                                                              • Paul Markham
                                                                Too old to care
                                                                • Jun 2001
                                                                • 52942

                                                                #32
                                                                Originally posted by stephthegeek
                                                                True, but anything can be considered erotic to those who have an interest in it. Should the intention really take precedence over the content? Who really cares if it's jack-off material for hebephiles?

                                                                They're already trying to take away the artistic merit defence for nude art in Canada. I just hate to see these issues overriding freedom of expression.
                                                                Maybe when your ten year old daughter wants to express her freedom by having nude pictures of herself on the Internet you will see the real picture.

                                                                Or maybe you will be like some of the parents of these children and pushing them to do it for the money.

                                                                These kind of pictures of a naked child could represent a crime. A chlid forced or tricked to pose for sick peoples pleasure.

                                                                Let's not confuse it with art.



                                                                Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
                                                                PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

                                                                Comment

                                                                • Nembrionic
                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                  • Feb 2003
                                                                  • 2424

                                                                  #33
                                                                  All models displayed on the site are 18 years or older.
                                                                  I've seen this on more dubious sites.

                                                                  It states they are 18(+) NOW, but not about their age when the content was produced. The content could be 4 years old....

                                                                  It's a sneaky way to put it like that..

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • DarkJedi
                                                                    No Refunds Issued.
                                                                    • Feb 2001
                                                                    • 28301

                                                                    #34
                                                                    That is hot.

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    • neewwman
                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                      • Jan 2002
                                                                      • 1737

                                                                      #35
                                                                      I don't think Met-Art can be held responsible if someone creates their own banner about "little girls."

                                                                      I've seen the members area of Met-Art and at least these days there's nothing questionable in there.

                                                                      Porn Wealth Everything the newbie adult webmaster needs to know. Buy it, or sell it through our 50% affiliate program!

                                                                      Comment

                                                                      • LadyMischief
                                                                        Orgasms N Such!
                                                                        • Sep 2002
                                                                        • 18135

                                                                        #36
                                                                        Originally posted by Dawgy
                                                                        "little girls" is not appropriate text for a banner in this business
                                                                        I missed that part. You are correct, the term "little girls' is fucking sick and DIRECTLY looking for pedo traffic.

                                                                        ICQ 3522039
                                                                        Content Manager - orgasm.com
                                                                        [email protected]

                                                                        Comment

                                                                        • hova
                                                                          Traffillionaire
                                                                          • Jan 2002
                                                                          • 22430

                                                                          #37
                                                                          Originally posted by MattO
                                                                          if you think it's something illegal, don't make a link to it goddammit
                                                                          AMEN
                                                                          http://traffillions.com/

                                                                          Sign up and get lifetime revshare on your traffic

                                                                          Comment

                                                                          Working...