Circumcision: The $1800 way to mutilate your newborn male children.
 

The only reason circumcision is still routinely done in this country is for money. Insurance companies are billed $1800 for the procedure and considering how many male babies are born in this country every year, that's a lot of money.

If you approve of routine circumcision, you approve of genital mutilation. What other countries practice gential mutilation? Israel and most African nations - except the Africans mutilate their little girls too.

I enjoy my mutilated penis. Chicks dig it too :thumbsup

ug

Probably since you don't know about better things. :)
But apparently chicks dig the looks, atleast in the us.

Circumcision makes a kid tough. It shows you at early age that life is no bowl of cherries.

Have it done. Maybe your kid will enlist in the Marines instead of living in your basement.

It's proven that circumcised penis have less pleasure from stimulation.

Possibly making your kid turn out like this:

http://www.circumstitions.com/Restri...hed/brij14.jpg

or this:

http://www.infocirc.org/fourn4.gif

Will it make him tougher? I'd think it would just guarantee that basement virgin you are worried about.

never had no complaints about my mutilated play toy :thumbsup

I didnt know untill I read it it is a FEDERAL law in the USA that the doctors must ASK both parents if they want their son circumsized.
Some lady sued the hospital in Chicago, why? They routinely had gotten used to circumsizing every male that as soon as a boy was born they would do it without asking for permission. She sued for something like $3 mil and won. :thumbsup

seems very barbaric, why isnt it illegal, for perents to do this to children?

Mine's still in the original packaging.

I love it. :thumbsup

I hope I never have a son. My wife and I have two daughters .. she wants a son .. I'm happy with 2 children.

We're at opposite ends of the debate and I'm not sure if I'd win. I'm strongly against circumcision but she is convinced that it's some kind of atrocity if the baby is not circumcised (and no she's not jewish - not religious at all in fact). The only reasons she can give me for justifying it are BS reasons like it's easier to clean (!!!) and it reduces the chance of a type of penile cancer.

Sex TV did an episode on circumcision where they clarified that penile cancer myth. While it is true that this type of cancer is virtually unheard of in circumcised men .. it is *extremely* rare to begin with. We don't remove tonsols at birth to prevent tonsolitis.. and tonsolitis is much more common.

i would never chop my kids wee, im not circumsized and i could never imagine being cut. it takes away alot of pleasure, why one earth would u want to lose sensitivty in your dick?

A kid shouldn't be tough, a kid is a kid, no little adult...they grow up and learn that life isn't all fun early enough. They need love and not pain !

Mines small enough as it is.

I'd hate to imagine how small it would be otherwise. :winkwink:

Heheheh. Easier to clean? Yeah.. it's fucking difficult to keep my dick clean. As far as I've heard uncut men are almost cleaner than cut men, since they HAVE to clean their cock so it won't be nasty and full of smegma. But whatever floats her boat.
It's a fucking atrocity to CUT it without concent.

Circumsized = Much cleaner... much less chance of spreading AIDS and other diseases (yes it's been proven)... looks better... why wouldn't you?

The rate of circumcision in Great Britain has dropped to approximately one percent, whereas in the United States it is estimated to be 65 percent or higher.


The white emollient under a boy's foreskin, known as smegma, is one of the most misunderstood and unjustifiably maligned substances in nature, says Dr. Thomas J. Ritter. Smegma is clean, not dirty, and is beneficial and necessary. It moisturizes the glans and keeps it smooth, soft, and supple. Its antibacterial and antiviral properties keep the penis clean and healthy.

http://www.parentsplace.com/babies/n...9981-3,00.html

actually very true... but most women I know hate a non-circumsized penis... looks to weird for them.. although there are some gay folks who prefer it.. so what ever floats your boat

Besides being a religious thing, I thought it was so it would be cleaner... didn't know it took away sensitivity though.
Personally I prefer them cut :Graucho

We actually agree on this.

a "mutilated" penis is just so much nicer to look at ...and much more appetizing :Graucho

Ivy

What are you, retard? Why don't you cite a study or two to back it up ?

Removing the foreskin of the penis actually removes 60% of the nerve tissue, therefore almost 60% of the penis's sensitivity.

Anyone who would mutilate the gentials of a child, for religion or vanity, is an ignorant sick fuck who should lose custody and be prosecuted for abuse.

what do you think about female circumcision?

Once your man is erect, really does it look different? I never took notice. As for my son, I chose not to circumsize him for the simple fact that I couldn't see the 'benefits' as opposed to the pain he would endure & complications that could arise.

Actually, I believe Iman (the model & David Bowie's wife) has her genitals mutilated. She did a campaign about it a few years ago to bring awareness to the rare subject. (female genital mutilation in africa for ritual/religious reasons, without consent)

Haha... that's bullshit.. Hahaha.

Cheers,
Matt

I circumcized my taint to match my pee-pee

I prefer a CUT one. I once dated a guy who wasn't and the opening wasn't large enough so he couldn't pull the skin back properly to clean it...GROSS!! anyways at the age of 27 he got it cut..painful but now he's a happier man..needless to say I didn't end up dating him for long..

why circumcise your penis?
it offends noone.

circumcise your brain.

Michael Jackson has a good start, he circumcised his nose.

I think all people before the age of six months should have their left ear loped off, it just sooooooo offensive.

as a well known board member said "amputate your head".

I'm cut and I don't remember it being all that painful :winkwink:

I'm cut. I had my son cut. Kinda wish I hadn't.


But I don't believe that "reduces sensitivity" line. I've got PLENTY of "sensitivity" for ya... Ladies: looking for a "sensitive" guy? :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

:1orglaugh

hes a god damn penis noob... seriously... im uncut and can pull my skin all the way back, he shouldve learned more about it.


When I was um, 14 or so, I had a girl pull the skin back so far that little tendon thing or string whatever on the bottom on your penis attached to your head snapped - but even before that i was able to pull it all the way back.

... good for you I guess

I wonder why there is such a huge difference on the numbers carried out in the US vs UK? Can anyone from Australia or Canada say how common it is in their country please.

When I had my little boy if a doctor had even suggested doing such a thing I'd have legged it out of there, in fact I've never seen a 'cut' penis in real life.

if it was better for men to not have a foreskin evolution would have made us all born without one. mother nature knows best, it keeps it clean and protects it from abrasion etc.

So when your sons asks, "Mommy why doesn't my willy look like the other boys in the locker room?" You can respond with... Oh son you will undersatnd and thank me in the future! :1orglaugh

Kelly question to you...

Since you've never seen a real cut penis do you think they are ugly? Since I've never seen an uncut one I think they are ugly.

at least i don't have to worry about getting my forskin caught in my zipper...

i recommend everyone get thier sons cut. otherwise his future girlfriend will laugh him out of bed when he pulls out his candle dick.

No, from pics they don't look ugly, just a little different, I was amazed at the numbers posted, I honestly thought it was only done as a religious practice!

Damn...gotta hate that!!! Still feels good to me though:1orglaugh

hehe

Ivy

that's not a normal practice in the US, like it is for guys...circumcision on males is a given and is the majority. For Females it s not, and somehow I don't see that ever becoming one. But if it had always been done and was considered the norm, I'm sure I'd feel the same way about that as I do about circumsized guys.

:2 cents:

Ivy

I can't believe all the nonsense spouted here as rationales for circumcision.

An uncut guy can go through a life time without seeing it, if he washes daily. I once didn't wash my cock for three days before finally seeing traces of it.

Name a body part that can go for 24 hours without a wash before starting to get a bit grotty. You can't.

So keep telling yourselves that it's a problem if you need to maintain the lie.

Being uncut has also never had any social problems as well. I played many team sports and never heard a comment from anyone in the lockerroom. Nor has any real woman ever complained and I have banged more women than you ever will.

Want to know the history of circumcision? Google "Dr Kellogg, circumcision". He was the sex -obsessed nut that started the tradition in the USA as a means of desensitizing the penis to deter masturbation. Even in his twisted mind it had nothing to do with cleanliness.

Why am I wasting my time writing this? I don't know.

Thank god I'm cut, or I would never hold out with my impressive 37.4 seconds.

It makes me angry that we can expect men to cut off their foreskins, but cannot ask women to cut off their clitoral hoods. They are the same thing, made of the same stuff, and serving the same purpose.