-
Now Taking Hard Link Trades
BTW - NEVER use thexxxhost.com -
Is this the new thing? Everyone puts up a sponsor ratio site?
-
coolComment
-
Sexy Payouts 4506 0:4506 .000
OUCH!
Comment
-
-
I guess so... I have posted this since November. (and get flamed evey time! lol)Originally posted by EviLGuY
Is this the new thing? Everyone puts up a sponsor ratio site?
Now Taking Hard Link Trades
BTW - NEVER use thexxxhost.comComment
-
I bet I can get that ratio under 1:323 if you send more traffic
Comment
-
How is Porno Pay Check 1:578 with only 426 sent?Comment
-
You really should try Pimproll...surprised it isn't on that list.SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.Comment
-
oops. fixed that one.Originally posted by JSA Matt
How is Porno Pay Check 1:578 with only 426 sent?Now Taking Hard Link Trades
BTW - NEVER use thexxxhost.comComment
-
I would like to, but I don't have a demand for much that you have to offer (mainly public flash)Originally posted by JSA Matt
I bet I can get that ratio under 1:323 if you send more traffic
Now Taking Hard Link Trades
BTW - NEVER use thexxxhost.comComment
-
awesome infoComment
-
Comment
-
Thanks. Some people like it, and some people don't.Originally posted by wdsguy
awesome infoNow Taking Hard Link Trades
BTW - NEVER use thexxxhost.comComment
-
Some nice ratios, and some very poor ratiosComment
-
Wow, is Mafia Bucks still around ?Comment
-
I don't send too much their way, but it is a pretty reliable sponsor. The checks come on time!Originally posted by DarkJedi
Wow, is Mafia Bucks still around ?Now Taking Hard Link Trades
BTW - NEVER use thexxxhost.comComment
-
Yeah, some of these really suck ass. Apple Cash has really improved... if you can believe it. The conversion ratio sucks, but retention is looking pretty good.Originally posted by Manowar
Some nice ratios, and some very poor ratiosNow Taking Hard Link Trades
BTW - NEVER use thexxxhost.comComment
-
I'm not flaming you.. just seems to be a bunch of them lately.Originally posted by BlueFly
I guess so... I have posted this since November. (and get flamed evey time! lol)
Comment
-
cool stats.....but where is Braincash? loll
Mr.North is still waiting
Comment
-
I think it's a good thing. Full disclosure... If everyone posts there numbers, people would know sponsors were full of shit when they say they convert blind traffic better than 1:50 and pay $50 per signup. Some sponsors really do well. Others don't.Originally posted by EviLGuY
I'm not flaming you.. just seems to be a bunch of them lately.
Now Taking Hard Link Trades
BTW - NEVER use thexxxhost.comComment
-
Basically agree with you, but lots of problems. For example, you have Silvercash on your list and they have a ton of sites. I doubt you are sending to all. So your results speak less for Silvercash than for the specific site(s) you are promoting. But we don't know which they are.Originally posted by BlueFly
I think it's a good thing. Full disclosure...
The method of promotion is another of a long list of variables. You write your own text links, use stock banners, or...? We have all experienced lousy results with sponsors other people swear by (even allowing for suspected hype and special deals) and vice versa. There is also the reality that when ratios are even as low as 1:100 (never mind the poorer ratios that are common), sales are going to cluster and that makes for unreliable stats on anything but huge numbers.
I know you recognize all this, because I have followed your other threads. So these comments are about the broader issue, not a criticism of what you are doing (except that I would question whether earnings per click is as useful a figure as earnings per impression).
I don't think a meaningful assessment of sponsor values is really possible unless hundreds of webmasters contributed to a single database (even then per site stats, rather than per sponsor, would be more relevant). If someone managed that, the fluctuations due to webmasters' individual methods would start to even out. Otherwise, if there were dozens of lists like yours, seeing who consistently appeared as good or bad could be useful.Comment
-
great stats
thanx
i will be glad if you can test us too
Comment
-
Nice list- I was just introduced to some new sponsors.Comment
-
Great Stats !
I think that they'll help a bit to make a decision when choosing a Sponsor for almost all of us...
Comment
-
Nice list and stats. Might want to try giving Porn DvD Dollars a go as you can send traffic to individual movie download sites or to the main page. With all the DVD length movie downloads offered to the surfer ratios can be amazing. Plus the free hosted movie gallery list is kick ass and growing all the time. Check them out Porn DVD DollarsGFY Voice of ReasonComment
-
You are right on the money! I agree totally. Normally, when I post this info, people say,"hey, I have that same ratio!" Now that more people are posting this, I think we will start seeing patterns.Originally posted by jayeff
Basically agree with you, but lots of problems. For example, you have Silvercash on your list and they have a ton of sites. I doubt you are sending to all. So your results speak less for Silvercash than for the specific site(s) you are promoting. But we don't know which they are.
The method of promotion is another of a long list of variables. You write your own text links, use stock banners, or...? We have all experienced lousy results with sponsors other people swear by (even allowing for suspected hype and special deals) and vice versa. There is also the reality that when ratios are even as low as 1:100 (never mind the poorer ratios that are common), sales are going to cluster and that makes for unreliable stats on anything but huge numbers.
I know you recognize all this, because I have followed your other threads. So these comments are about the broader issue, not a criticism of what you are doing (except that I would question whether earnings per click is as useful a figure as earnings per impression).
I don't think a meaningful assessment of sponsor values is really possible unless hundreds of webmasters contributed to a single database (even then per site stats, rather than per sponsor, would be more relevant). If someone managed that, the fluctuations due to webmasters' individual methods would start to even out. Otherwise, if there were dozens of lists like yours, seeing who consistently appeared as good or bad could be useful.Now Taking Hard Link Trades
BTW - NEVER use thexxxhost.comComment
-
Stupid Cash needs to be on that list!Comment
-
Just look at my sigOriginally posted by jayeff
Basically agree with you, but lots of problems. For example, you have Silvercash on your list and they have a ton of sites. I doubt you are sending to all. So your results speak less for Silvercash than for the specific site(s) you are promoting. But we don't know which they are.
The method of promotion is another of a long list of variables. You write your own text links, use stock banners, or...? We have all experienced lousy results with sponsors other people swear by (even allowing for suspected hype and special deals) and vice versa. There is also the reality that when ratios are even as low as 1:100 (never mind the poorer ratios that are common), sales are going to cluster and that makes for unreliable stats on anything but huge numbers.
I know you recognize all this, because I have followed your other threads. So these comments are about the broader issue, not a criticism of what you are doing (except that I would question whether earnings per click is as useful a figure as earnings per impression).
I don't think a meaningful assessment of sponsor values is really possible unless hundreds of webmasters contributed to a single database (even then per site stats, rather than per sponsor, would be more relevant). If someone managed that, the fluctuations due to webmasters' individual methods would start to even out. Otherwise, if there were dozens of lists like yours, seeing who consistently appeared as good or bad could be useful.
Comment
-
It will be next month! I just started sending traffic, and didn't rack up enough to make this list.Originally posted by Hardcore J
Stupid Cash needs to be on that list!Now Taking Hard Link Trades
BTW - NEVER use thexxxhost.comComment
-
Glad to help out!Originally posted by Need2Know
Great Stats !
I think that they'll help a bit to make a decision when choosing a Sponsor for almost all of us...
Now Taking Hard Link Trades
BTW - NEVER use thexxxhost.comComment
-
Comment
-
cool
porndollar.comComment
Comment