RE: Targetting Paedophiles + Teen Sites.
 

I'm so sick of seeing webmasters copping shit for having young looking girls on their websites. Some people would never stfu about Lightspeed "targetting pedos" and more recently, the appearnace of Little April and the text on her website from Triple X Cash.

It is totally normal for a guy to be attracted to girls around the age of 18. These girls *do* look about 18. But really, all that really matters is whether or not they are 18 years old. Case closed at that point, really.

But then people will say that even though the girls are 18, that they are targetting pedos. Some of you need to understand what attracts a paedophile. It's more than the appearance. It's the naive innocenece. It's the openness. It's the willingness to learn that a young child has and the ability of the paedophile to exploit it. As soon as you mention that a girl is 18 years old, then the appeal to a paedophile is lost because 18 year olds aren't malleable like a child.

"Hi, my name is April and i am 18 years old"

"I'm young, i'm LEGAL, i'm dirty"

Now, if the site made no mention of her age, then i'd say they appealing to paedophiles, perhaps unintentionally, but it's a non-issue because they do mention her age.

So it doesn't matter what you do. You could dress her up in a school girl's dress and surround her with teddy bears. Knowing she's 18 years old, paedophiles will not be interested.

The point is: Make it very clear that she's 18+ years old, and you're not doing a thing wrong.

Does not bother me.

the only point that I need to make here since I recently had someone I knew in toronto be charged being a CP producer, is the age factor that is considered child porn.

What age is considered child porn? I always assumed that legally, it was anything under the age of 18?

http://www.fact-index.com/c/ch/child_pornography.html

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/2256.html

Definitions of child pornography vary widely.

In most countries, "children" are defined to be persons below the age of 14 or 16, and "pornography" is defined to be depiction of actual sexual activity. In these countries nudist magazines with depictions of nude underage persons are widely available.

The United States of America uses a particularly broad definition, which applies to all people appearing to be below the age of 18 and covers all materials aimed at "prurient interests", even if no nudity is involved. In at least one case, nude pictures of small children in bath tubs have been declared to be child pornography.


Definition of pedophilia

http://www.umkc.edu/sites/hsw/issues/pedophil.html


Pedophilia involves reoccurring sexual arousal and desires or fantasies involving sexual impulses toward a pre-adolescent child or children. The pedophile must be above age 16, and the sexual attraction must involve a child of age 13 or younger who is at least 5 years younger than the adult. A pedophile has either acted on these sexual impulses, or the fantasies and / or sexual arousal and impulses disturb the individual. The pedophile is sexually aroused because the child is a child, regardless of the pedophile's sexual orientation, or the child's gender.


http://www.wordiq.com/definition/Paedophilia

so basically the definitions on the board needs to be

child porn = 18 and under
Pedophilia = 13 and under if you are 5 years or more older


people get the two confused

Thanks for the clarification.

Technically, the attraction to teenagers (those after puberty) is called hebephilia. I've stayed out of all the "pedo" threads here so far, because it is an issue that really gets my back up. I don't like the knee-jerk reaction to any girl five seconds under 18. I know this is the porn biz, and the law is the law, but it's this reaction that being physically attracted to teenagers is somehow "wrong" that is frustrating.

I love that littleapril.com site.
sweet

The content on Little April makes it pretty easy to lose yourself in the FANTASY that Little April is really "little" . . . like under 13. Come on, do girls on the verge of college look like this?
http://shitsniffer.com/blogimages/ot...leapril-06.jpg
I'm not saying the site is child porn, not saying it's criminal . . . not even saying it's wrong to masturbate to it. But if you're jacking off to Little April content, you're not jacking off to the fantasy of an 18 year old even if she really is. The sets, the props, the poses -- the whole thing seem designed to project an image of PREteen, not teenager.

I never understood what is so attractive in underage (real or simulated) girls...

Indeed. Sure i look at a 16 yr old chick if she has a nice body and a nice face but as a girlfriend i dont want anything younger than 20. 23 actually.