GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Nobody likes Lara Roxx (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=293228)

johndoebob 05-12-2004 10:23 PM

Nobody likes Lara Roxx
 
I guess I'm not the only one who thinks she's ugly,not even one person of my last ~2000 visitors did click on any Lara Roxx thumb :thumbsup

Mr. Marks 05-12-2004 10:25 PM

poor girl... :(

cspdinc 05-12-2004 10:56 PM

adult FYI reports she got a lawyer and is looking for deep pockets in the 1,000,000 dollar range. (I dont think they'll find one though on paper) to blame and take to court...

James White 05-12-2004 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by cspdinc
adult FYI reports she got a lawyer and is looking for deep pockets in the 1,000,000 dollar range. (I dont think they'll find one though on paper) to blame and take to court...

She wont get anything like that

Axeman 05-12-2004 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by cspdinc
adult FYI reports she got a lawyer and is looking for deep pockets in the 1,000,000 dollar range. (I dont think they'll find one though on paper) to blame and take to court...
She's dreaming if she thinks she will get that.

stev0 05-12-2004 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by cspdinc
adult FYI reports she got a lawyer and is looking for deep pockets in the 1,000,000 dollar range. (I dont think they'll find one though on paper) to blame and take to court...
Fuck that, the only person she can blame is herself.

pure energy 05-12-2004 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by stev0
Fuck that, the only person she can blame is herself.

Yup. A person should be responsible for all his actions and the consequences that will come out of it. :2 cents:

Tania 05-12-2004 11:18 PM

i agree she's her on folt she can't make nothing (stupid bithc):Graucho

TheFrog 05-12-2004 11:19 PM

Yup, she was pretty uggers

hottoddy 05-13-2004 12:06 AM

Besides her grim looks, she was out buttfucking bareback with all those nasty open sores ... it's not really surprising that she would be a prime candidate for HIV.

SYNIKAL 05-13-2004 12:10 AM

She wanted to take double anal, she is her own fault... She shoulda taken percautions... She didnt, so her lawsuit is BULLSHIT and should be thrown out

Illicit 05-13-2004 12:11 AM

she isnt that hot, he claim to fame is what happend to her, and if you dont know who she is why would ya click

GigaXXX 05-13-2004 12:31 AM

yep

ChrisExtreme 05-13-2004 01:26 AM

If McDoanlds can get sued and lose because the coffee is too hot then I'm sure a hiv infected pornstar can sue someone and win.

:2 cents:

Goose 05-13-2004 01:28 AM

that a question of taste...when you got that kind of odd taste ;)

johndoebob 05-13-2004 02:45 AM

Quote:

she isnt that hot, he claim to fame is what happend to her, and if you dont know who she is why would ya click
I posted who she is and nobody clicked yet.Exclusive Lara Roxx pics (the one from the aids scandal) blah...

Bigfuck 05-13-2004 02:47 AM

Her claim to fame will fade fast

Vitasoy 05-13-2004 02:49 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ChrisExtreme
If McDoanlds can get sued and lose because the coffee is too hot then I'm sure a hiv infected pornstar can sue someone and win.

:2 cents:



Depends how good her lawyer is... :)

RicardoB 05-13-2004 03:03 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ChrisExtreme
If McDoanlds can get sued and lose because the coffee is too hot then I'm sure a hiv infected pornstar can sue someone and win.

:2 cents:

My thoughts exactly

EviLGuY 05-13-2004 03:43 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by johndoebob
I guess I'm not the only one who thinks she's ugly,not even one person of my last ~2000 visitors did click on any Lara Roxx thumb :thumbsup
Yeah she doesn't do it for me either.

Nano 05-13-2004 04:12 AM

She's very ugly, indeed!

hova 05-13-2004 04:16 AM

Shes extremely ugly, and she shouldn't get any money.........

webmaster x 05-13-2004 04:25 AM

Oh, well. I think her beauty had already passed

Paul Waters 05-13-2004 04:26 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ChrisExtreme
If McDoanlds can get sued and lose because the coffee is too hot then I'm sure a hiv infected pornstar can sue someone and win.

:2 cents:

That is the 'merican legal system for ya.

:rasta

kmanrox 05-13-2004 04:27 AM

i'd hit it

DR_PHIL 05-13-2004 05:34 AM

she sucks

Corleone 05-13-2004 05:50 AM

poor girl.. but if she wouldnt be infected with aids nobody would care about her and would call her ugly . she's not the hottest girl

Corleone 05-13-2004 05:51 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by kmanrox
i'd hit it
use condoms!

NoCarrier 05-13-2004 05:52 AM

Amazing how a lawsuit can change opinions. :glugglug :1orglaugh

http://www.adultbeat.com/article/laura.jpg

Harmon 05-13-2004 05:53 AM

she's a fucking dog. i would suck on her ass lesions if she asked me. saran wrap of course :thumbsup

Preacher 05-13-2004 05:57 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by NoCarrier
Amazing how a lawsuit can change opinions. :glugglug :1orglaugh

:1orglaugh

Monique Niccole 05-13-2004 06:43 AM

It's interesting that people seem to have sympathy for Jessica Dee and not Lara Roxx. I'm not saying it's wrong...just interesting.

Unfortunately, Lara has shown herself to be a complete idiot and a potential enemy to our industry. I think that's the difference.:(

fris 05-13-2004 07:13 AM

look at all the celebs without makeup? look at everyone that hangs around in there sweats would they go out in public like that? no of course not is she looking her best? no. of course not. in film she looks better. she is at home and took that picture there of course she doesnt look as good as when she goes out. i give her that much. maybe she doesnt look like your top of the line porn star. but not everyone is perfect. i know i am not. i am sure she is going through a lot, and to see you guys ragging on her, i am sure she is reading all the negative comment, i am sure if it was us talking about your girlfriends saying how dog ugly she was, you would be offended. she has a disease now and she has to deal with it. so why not just lay back on the comments a little. dont you think its kinda harsh?

JamesK 05-13-2004 07:15 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by stev0
Fuck that, the only person she can blame is herself.
What he said.

NickB. 05-13-2004 07:17 AM

We can be in business because of the models!

No Models, No Business!

We can give her more respect than this, but a lawsuit.....
Who can she blame?

johndoebob 05-13-2004 07:19 AM

They ain't doing it for the respect,they are doing it for the money,she's an ugly bitch,period. :thumbsup

amacontent 05-13-2004 07:55 AM

Im not sure where she contracted the disease, but if she shot in the US with Darren, first thing that will happen to end any chance of lawsuit will be .. why was she in this country working without a green card. Unless of course she has one or worked with Darren in Canada

HS-Trixxxia 05-13-2004 08:09 AM

This case will take many years - years to win/lose and years to collect the money (in the case that she wins). She may never see the money yet it will cost her a fortune.

Not because I'm picking sides - but she should stick to living her life to the fullest while she can. She's only going to put herself in a worse situation and lose any sympathy or financial help she could have received from the industry. By acting naive and hoping to win the hearts of the regular population, she just closing one door not realizing that the mainstream population won't sympathize with a Pornstar wannabe with a bad streak of bad luck.

That's my personal opinion.

johndoebob 05-13-2004 08:13 AM

Nobody will talk about her anymore after a month and I really doubt she'll be able to proof that it wasn't her own fault that she caught aids.

ParasiteTV 05-13-2004 08:23 AM

whoa.

i can't belive the shit you guys are talking. leave the chick alone: ugly this, nasty that... I wonder what you all look like, seeing that you have to pay chicks to be within 2 ft of your fat asses, I'd presume you ain't much better off.

secondly i think i should be illegal to shoot no-condom porn, and if lara can bring this up, all the more power to her.

I hope she sues: coersion, no-condoms; endangerment, et al.
I hope she wins.

beergood 05-13-2004 08:32 AM

She's got horse face.......but......you don't fuck her face. I (would've) hit it.

johndoebob 05-13-2004 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ParasiteTV
whoa.

i can't belive the shit you guys are talking. leave the chick alone: ugly this, nasty that... I wonder what you all look like, seeing that you have to pay chicks to be within 2 ft of your fat asses, I'd presume you ain't much better off.

secondly i think i should be illegal to shoot no-condom porn, and if lara can bring this up, all the more power to her.

I hope she sues: coersion, no-condoms; endangerment, et al.
I hope she wins.

Mate if you ain't got a clue - stfu,kthx bye :thumbsup

To get it straight again.She says lots of bullshit,she's damn retarded,it doesn't matter how I look like cause I ain't getting payed to fuck.She thinks she's a star,looks good and can piss everybody off but in fact she is ugly,nobody wanted to book her and she did everything to get some cash.

If you work with or without condoms is your own decision and if you don't ask for hiv tests it's your own fault.

BVF 05-13-2004 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ParasiteTV

secondly i think i should be illegal to shoot no-condom porn, and if lara can bring this up, all the more power to her.

This must be coming from a NON-pornographer.

ParasiteTV 05-13-2004 08:49 AM

actually i've shot porn content, and ALWAYS had the actors use condoms.

HIV testing is not always accurate: example: I get tested, comes back negative on monday... my shoot is on friday... between monday and friday i sleep with 4 people...

thats why its imperative to always use condoms.

i think not using condoms is equal to doctors not sterilizing their instruments. and those who coerce their actors not to use condoms should be held responsible for infections just as people in the medical industry are held responsible for disease transmission.

Monique Niccole 05-13-2004 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ParasiteTV
I hope she sues: coersion, no-condoms; endangerment, et al.
I hope she wins.

that would be a bullshit suit. ever heard of "free will"?

ParasiteTV 05-13-2004 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Afrekete
that would be a bullshit suit. ever heard of "free will"?
ever heard of coersion? ever heard of taking advantage of mentally unstable individuals?

Monique Niccole 05-13-2004 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ParasiteTV
ever heard of coersion? ever heard of taking advantage of mentally unstable individuals?
She's your average unstable girl...there are thousands of them out there -- in porn and not in porn. Unless she's deemed mentally unstable or a mentally challenged retard, then there's no reason why anyone should think she's been taken advantage of.

Would the government come to your rescue if you decided to fuck someone (off-camera, totally consensual) and you happened to get HIV? NO.

CDSmith 05-13-2004 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ParasiteTV
ever heard of coersion? ever heard of taking advantage of mentally unstable individuals?
You should quit porn and become a lawyer.

ParasiteTV 05-13-2004 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Afrekete
She's your average unstable girl...there are thousands of them out there -- in porn and not in porn. Unless she's deemed mentally unstable or a mentally challenged retard, then there's no reason why anyone should think she's been taken advantage of.

Would the government come to your rescue if you decided to fuck someone (off-camera, totally consensual) and you happened to get HIV? NO.

No but proven that she was a drug addict, needed cash, and that the company coerced her to do the scene, ie: double anal, without condoms, or no deal..

things can get pretty messy.

CDSmith 05-13-2004 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ParasiteTV
No but proven that she was a drug addict, needed cash, and that the company coerced her to do the scene, ie: double anal, without condoms, or no deal..

things can get pretty messy.

Where exactly did you hear about the "coersion", or from whom?


I suggested there <i>MAY</i> have been some persuasion or coersion going on in her case, back when the story first broke. I was suggesting it as a possibility only, and a few guys who seemed to be in-the-know about her case came on and said flat-out that there was no coersion that they knew of.

I'd like to know where you're getting this knowledge or what you are basing your posts on.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123