is this illigal or is it fine? (child porn i think)
 

http://www.stylish-models.com/webmaster.html

an affiliate program for child porn??

I was starting to think about who i can complain to, but then realized it specifically states no nudity.

But arent they using children to push sexual "ideas" in order to make money? Nude or not i think it should be banned.

BUT since they have so many active sites i am guessing somebody at some point has already complained unsuccessfully.

Does anyone know any anti-CP boards so i can go post the link and let them play with it?

thanks if you can help

edit! edit! edit!

i'm not even going to check..

its legal, but shitty

FUCK THAT SHIT


DUDE WHO GOT BEHEADED IS MORE IMPORTANT

if thats true it really sucks big time. Using a CHILD to put ideas of sex in someones head ...

ok fine they arent nude, but they IMPLY nudity with sexy poses, pulling on panties, etc.

seams like they are riding a FINE line between decent and not .... but i would honestly think they have crossed it, even if only by an inch.

that makes me so angry


:feels-hot

Same here.


:glugglug

lol, explain to me the purpose of altar boys?



nothing can be done about it, its a technicality, if it is made illegal than many legitamite people would be arrested as well

dude, thats way too close to cp in my opinion:mad:

Go for it! I'd say you got your views right about this one!

that's not good :(

well they got this image on their site...so it must be legal :1orglaugh
http://www.stylish-models.com/images/nochildforn.gif

:1orglaugh

that reminds me of a tattoo place around here that sold bongs and other paraphanalia. they had a sign on the glass saying if you talked about smoking anything other than tobacco with them he wouldnt sell it to you (yeah right..)

heck they have a top list



edit removed URL

Childs yes, porn no.

yeah, that's tooooo sketchy if you ask me. I'd say you post it on the anti-cp boards and see what they think of it. You're not incriminating anyone, just bringing something borderline to their attention

no cp, legal, but it sure is fucked up

Disturbing..they say non nude but they are lifting their shirt and showing off their butts in underwear .Borderline

looks legal, but still fucked:(

So gross...

:( :( :(

Actually that is NOT legal. Even though the girls are clothed, they are in sexually suggestive poses, which is all that is needed for it to be cp.

Even a child fully dressed can be child porn.

Tell me, when you do EVER see a 5 year old girl standing like that.

that's fuckin' wrong :feels-hot

AHAHA whoever gets turned on by that shit is seriously fucked in the head, do you see these poses these girls are in?

Makes you wonder where the fuck their parents are:warning

ash kroft should be cracking down and shit like this and leaving us triple anal bukkae site owners alone :2 cents:

thats because by law they cant sell to you if you mention weed or say bong or anything like that. they really dont care or they wouldnt be running the store in the first place, but they need to protect their ass.

i think these sites should be illegal even though their isnt any nudity. they parents should be put in jail too.

I actually read an investigation the FBI had done into some of these sites. Most found the girls were VERY poor from 3rd world countries, russia, Croatia, Serbia etc, they pay the girls $15,000 usd for the images for the site, for us, thats nothing, for their parents, they are instant millionares in their country.

Dave, the expert on the subject.

:1orglaugh

Wrong, then the Sears catalog can be sued for children in swimsuits.

No see, thats where your wrong, the girls in the Sears catalog are not MEANT to be sexually enticing, THESE images however ARE.


Big difference.

They have their excuse... see the titles: FASHION

:repuke

This fucking assclown has a NON NUDE 100% LEGAL seal on his website.

That seal was created for NON NUDE websites which feature 18+ MODELS ONLY!

There's a whole group of people who are fighting desperately against the underage shit and FOR the 18+ stuff.

The seal was intended for LEGAL 18+ NN sites...

Not for some stupid fucking pedo asshole....

WTF!! I have 6 kidz and I'm very fucking pizzed off by this!!

:feels-hot

Whether it is legal or not shouldnt be a question but if you enjoy sick shit like this then there is something seriously wrong with you. People get ideas into their head and move onto the real stuff that is even more disgusting. If this shit wasnt around to give these sick fucks ideas there may be less child molestors, just maybe... :2 cents:

Dave Stodghill (VideoVoyeur) was pedaling cp when EZPlugContent filled a $2,015,676 judgement against him. Will they actually see that money from him, probably not, but they will see some more. They already grabbed his stuff and had a sheriff's sale before, but it didn't amount to that much, at all. He has since been carrying on his online activities under the name of his wife, Samantha Stodghill.

http://ezplugcontent.com/dave/canadateens.htm
http://ezplugcontent.com/dave/pottytarts.htm

The 'varsity teens' links were linked to cp. If you want to see the judgement, here are the links.

http://ezplugcontent.com/dave/
http://ezplugcontent.com/dave/index1.htm

knock, knock - Who's there?



:evil-laug

it`s legal now... but I still can`t realise why some people are interested in this? :(

welcome to the misinterpretation of free speech

They need to stop fucking around with regular porn guys and get rid of shit like that ASAP.

They should be shot in the fucking head.. no one would do that shit just for the money.

if this is website looks like a fashion models.. it is legal. But if the pictures will looks like "erotic pictures" this is 100% illegal... Yes it is very bad, that they use child for adult business.

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showt...threadid=291676

As we can see you are full of shit.

According to this conman, from the ICQ conversation I just had from him just now, he can do anything he wants to on this board without being banned. You know what - I believe him.

He's told me that he is going to go to Eric and Lensman and have me banned. Not only that, but he's going to have all the threads deleted that I have posted in recently about him, trying to play the victim card.

Well, I can't say that it's a bad idea for him. He's had Eric delete MAJOR threads on him before. I am not going to take that chance again. I have ALL the threads downloaded here on my harddrive, just for safe keeping.

"This collection is totally legal of exclusive NO NUDE photos"

Still they sux

Keep in mind that this is all from back in 2002.

http://www.ezplugcontent.com/dave/index1.htm

Um hey dipshit, hes not talking about me you ass munch.

I CANT believe that !!!! Its gotta be against the law !! Poor babies
xx Bessie
www.bessiebardot.com

I don't care.

Here's more shit on you.



Here's what VideoVoyeur (David Stodghill) is all about:

http://board.gofuckyourself.com/sear...der=descending


VideoVoyeur you fucking scumbag!

VideoVoyeur(Davie) credibilty..lol

DAVE STODGHILL (aka Video Voyeur, OAEN, Brian Hicks, etc.) is now posting as Crypto.

OR, the most recent thread, started by Juicy:

Video Voyuer, Dave whatever name you go by now...

There's more threads on Dave Stodghill and his aliases. This is just a sampler!

:winkwink:

scumbags will do anything to make money!

who the fuck would let there kids model for shit like that.

its borderliner CP, if i was you i'd report it, as only sick pedos would join that site.

:feels-hot

raceist

that is fucking outrageous. who the hell would let there kids pose like that???