Blacks on Blondes now censors tours, is everyone else going to?
 

What do you think?

http://www.blacksonblondes.com

it's bullshit

"better to be safe than sorry."

Hmmm interesting.

That's pretty half assed censoring. You can still see all the body parts you're not supposed to.

All the tours I've been promoting have been censored all this time.
WG

I still see dicks and pussy on the tour...It's a waste to put bright spots on the asshole when I can still see the twat...

and I thought that BOB used ccbill? Now I see that they are using paycom

Interracial sex is illegal and immoral

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

I think it's a good tease for the surfer. Sure, you can see some anus and some meat flaps, as well as some cock shaft, however the leave the actual penetration & money shots to the imagination. You know, the GOOOOOOD stuff. I would have to guess that that tour will convert better IMO :2 cents: It will cut down on freeloaders

i think it should be done that way, of course a little better than they did it. but i don't like seeing free fucking hardcore everywhere.

I bet conversions go up. :2 cents:

I'm sure that if the surfer is coming from a tgp or whatever he goes to a normal tour

Let's just say they are capitalizing big time on having censored tours.

All the SE guys know what I am talking about.

How? Why?

doesnt look like it

http://www.blacksonblondes.com/main.php?rid=bob0100

Yup :winkwink:

Fuck the censors! :2 cents:

if it increases conversions, sure!

its a very smart move. When we changed our tour two yrs ago to less graphic our sales doubled. I was able to come home full time. If a surfer can see it all for free ,he can jerk off to it then and why pay at that point ?

censored tours generally do better because it sells the fact "you gotta be a member to see the hardcore"

This censoring style looks ok for me. Sales stay on the same level for me.
Did they got a registered letter from Germany :Graucho

I think its the right thing to do, but their designer did it in a a really ugly way.

Sorry the censoring was done in such an ugly was as to offend you. Next time we do any censoring, we'll make sure it's in an utmost beatiful and gorgeous way. We make money, not beautiful censor dots. :)

That's weak!!

If you can see tits, dick and ass but no penetration, the site is still at risk so you might as well push the limit. They still show more than a child should see.

*waits for someone to photoshop juicy's face on all the bright spots*

I think it's a good idea... i censored my tours and conversions went up :thumbsup

huh...bet they used an indian designer

Epoch charges me a $2 check writing fee for my BoB checks
but they convert like MAD for me

I hate that censoring...

What's wrong on tits, dicks and asses? Nude is nude, it's natural. The tours shouldn't be in hardcore style, but a child's mind shouldn't be damaged if it sees some tits.

i think there's some people in utah that would disagree :1orglaugh

How much money are we talking here?

:1orglaugh

Yes, but somewhere must be a border. I believe the Flynt Digital tours are very softcore and they do very well. But the industry shouldn't be damaged. Have a look at germany, the rules for accessing adult content are inaceptable and damaging the german adult industry.

You thought wrong. BOB has always used paycom.

I think censored tours have more to do with following legal advice than conversions.
In my experience censored and softcore tours don't sell nearly as well.

:2 cents:

lol, if they are really trying ot censor they are doing a bad job at it

Yes, I've noticed TCG censors tours.

Have you noticed any difference in conversions with tours that are censored? Have conversions been noticeably better than those which are not censored?

I would say BOB is one of the most successfull sites in the web. A real moneymaker like bangbus.

Btw: Yeah, 400th post!

Ridiculous. Some offshore companies are gonna make bank filling the hole this creates.

The pros outweigh the cons .. this is a good thing. :thumbsup

*edit, added thumbsup

I'm not sure what you mean here. If you're implying that offshore=no censorship, I disagree.


We've seen a dramatic increase in conversions once we censored tours (spunkmouth.com and soon JOMG.com) and kept the guys from jacking to completion with the tour

With the current administration, it's very, very smart to censor...especially if you're a paysite owner.

Win-Win all the way around...

that censoring is weak at best. Not only does it not really censor much of anything, but it's a most lame way of doing it.

if you're going to censor, at least do a professional job of it. :2 cents:

covering the good bits helps on my tours but I don't do such hardcore sites.

http://www.blacksonblondes.com/newma...rooklyn/09.jpg

lol

Who are you kidding with those little stars.. or the lack of it..?

agreed.


IF bob is ever busted and shit like this is put in front of a jury the obvious response is the same as this poster.

who are they kidding? cover a labia, but leave an asshole?

come on!

if you really want to be proactive and keep the smut away from folks who don't want it, and allow parents to keep their kids off your shit you need to label your sites (ICRA).

at least then no one can say your didn't make an effort.

this sort of censoring will mostly just piss some members of a jury off.

true, it may increase conversions, but this will not keep the heat off.

censored tours sucks :(

I like censored tours myself.. when done correctly. :2 cents:

He's not censoring nudity, he's just censoring the sex.