![]() |
Penthouse: Billing Unit Under Anti-Trust Probe
6 May 2004
13:53 Dow Jones Corporate Filings Alert English (c) 2004 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. DJ CFA SOURCE: SEC 8-K REASON CODES: 5--Other Materially Important Events WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--The Department of Justice is investigating a newly-acquired billing unit of Penthouse International Inc. (PHSLE) in an anti-trust probe, according to a Form 8-K that the company filed Thursday with the Securities and Exchange Commission. As part of the investigation, Penthouse said Internet Billing Co. LLC must provide the department with information regarding certain one-time fees charged to merchants in 2003. The inquiry seeks to determine whether several Internet payment providers, including Internet Billing, collaborated to set those fees and if so, whether those practices are anti-competitive, according to the filing. As reported, Penthouse acquired Internet Billing in March from InterCept Inc. through its Media Billing LLC unit. The company said it learned of the investigation after closing the deal. Penthouse said it is responding to the Justice Department's requests and will continue cooperating with the inquiry. The company added that it is protected against certain actions taken by Internet Billing before the acquisition closed. But the company believes the potential damage claims could exceed the $3.8 million agreed upon in the purchase deal with InterCept, according to the filing. As a result, Penthouse said it will withhold payments to InterCept until the investigation is resolved or until InterCept posts "adequate" collateral to secure its protective obligations to the company. [ 05-06-04 1724ET ] DJ CFA SOURCE: SEC 8-K REASON CODES: 5--Other Materially Important Events InterCept is also seeking $3.8 million in cash from the largest shareholder of Penthouse International as part of its sale in April of Internet Billing Co., according the filing. InterCept claims that Media Billing has defaulted on a $703,749, 8% note issued in connection with the purchase of Internet Billing, also known as iBill. Media Billing issued the note March 22 as part of its $10.25 million purchase of the iBill platform, according to the filing, along with $750,000 in cash paid to InterCept and a further $2,804,000 in cash paid to First Data Merchant Services, a business partner of iBill. The filing also indicated that InterCept claims Media Billing failed to cause First Data to release a $3 million letter of credit backing the iBill purchase, and that Media Billing thus owes Intercept around $3.8 million in cash under the terms of their March 16 purchase agreement. Media Billing's obligations under the purchase agreement, according to the filing, are guaranteed by Luis Enrique Fernando Molina G., the controlling shareholder of Penthouse International. The filing also indicated a potential issue with respect to the indemnification of Media Billing by InterCept against any pre-closing liabilities associated with the iBill sale. According to the filing, Intercept received notice on April 21 from a former client of iBill demanding payment related to a dispute over fines levied by Mastercard and passed onto iBill clients in 2003. The demand indicated the former client's intention "to file a lawsuit and seek class action status unless satisfactory payment arrangements can be made immediately," according to the filing. The damage claims in the demand were unspecified but indicate a potential value of "eight figures" according to the filing. |
:1orglaugh
|
8 figures.
:) |
"trustedsource" :1orglaugh :1orglaugh
|
trusted source
Registered: Mar 2004 Location: Posts: 1 :Graucho |
Ibill was only worth 3.8 million?
|
hmmmm
|
Uh oh.
|
Interesting...
|
Guccione 's world is falling apart.
|
Not good.
And it begs the question did all the IPSP's set the $750 registration fee arbitrarily and without any guidance from Visa? |
bump
|
Quote:
Visa said they wanted X and the IPSP charged Y. Y just happened to be more then X. The feds want to make sure its all on the up and up. |
wasnt part of it supposed to be some admin charge?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm sure any other overages would be labeled a service charge :) I don't see what the big deal is. Hey everyone has to make a buck right? Even the two saloon owners talk to each other in Deadwood. This is not a case of price fixing IMO. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:45 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123