![]() |
Anyone had an IBM Deskstar drive fail?
My 2 year old 60Gb went out a couple of months ago and I've been trying since then occasionally to get the data off it. It just clicks a lot and cycles down then up, like it's trying to calibrate to read the sector properly. About 15% of the sectors went bad all at once.
Sounds terminal doesn't it? Well, this morning I low level formatted it to get rid of all the remaining data before I sent it off for replacement. Drive works fine now. Absolutely no bad sectors at all. And it still has 100% of its capacity available, it's not just that the LL format quietly remapped the bad sectors out of sight. One theory I saw was that one of the heads was writing while it was moving across the platter. This guy made a graph showing where his bad sectors were, and they made the pattern of a spiral. So it's probable that my drive is 100% mechanically sound, but there's some nasty firmware bug waiting to spray white-out over part of it again. I can't return it now since it's a "perfectly" working drive. :( |
Never had any problems with IBM drives, I make it a point to try and buy them exclusively. :thumbsup
|
Quote:
I didn't even realise that Hitachi =<b></b>= IBM drives now, until I purchased a new drive and it looked EXACTLY the same as my dead one. :helpme You've never heard about the Deskstar GXP "screech of death" problems? Mine didn't fail mechanically (yet), but plenty have... I think the percentage of returns was exceeding double figures for a while. |
you mean the deathstar? they suck. will never own another.
|
i've had dozens of death stars fail. dozens.
|
IBM never "rebadged" others drives (at least not in recent history). They may have "shared" technology with other drive manuf. (namely: seagate), but they were actually a major assembly OEM provider for other companies.
IBM's storage division was sold off to Hitachi about 2 years ago, many believe due to the Deskstar 75GXP fiasco in which they had inordinant failure rates they did not handle properly (at the time, the drive was *THE* drive in terms of capacity/speed, prior to this IBM had an absolute stellar reliability record). We luckily never bought any effected 75GXP series drives. However, we have *many* (and I do mean MANY.. over 200) 60GXP and 120GXP models in server use 24/7. We have had exactly one 60GB model fail in over 3 years of using these drives. We still buy hitachi drives from time to time, depending on requirements - although our standard supplier is seagate in 95% of all cases. Honestly, drive failure isn't a huge problem here now that I think about it, I can count on one hand the number of drives we have replaced due to failure, and not even one has resulted in substantial data loss. Man.. I shouldn't hahahahaha this. :/ -Phil |
I used to swear by IBM drives also. I have an IBM 8.4Gb from 1997 that has spent its life in two servers (24/7) and it was still going strong when I retired it last year to replace it with a much larger capacity drive. It will probably go into a spare desktop one of these days...
|
rowan - definitely. All I used to spec was IBM drives, or seagate in some cases.
I have an old IBM SCSI drive (10,000RPM, one of the quick ones that contended w/ the cheetahs back in the day) that has been in constant use since 1996. The thing runs so hot it hurts to touch it, and makes a REALLY bad whineing sound (has for over 2 years now!). However, still going strong. I am afraid to power it off though. :) -Phil |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:41 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123