Not enough nudity...
 

Who here thinks there is not enough nudity in this gallery... Remember, TGP's are for advertising not for wacking off! Right?
http://www.nobulladult.com/tgp/dakotah/index_1.htm
Denny

i think there's enough.

Well the TGP would not list it... Said there was not enough nudity?

you'd be surprised what a gallery can get rejected for... i had one a while back get rejected (not from Richard's Realm tho) because "the model's boobs look too fake"

WTF?

TGPs are very fickle. They don't give a fuck how well your gallery converts. The more nudity/sex they post, the more visitors/bookmarkers they get.

great thanks!:thumbsup

I don't think the nudity is an issue..not enough variety in the pictures, though....I see 2 of those pics, and the rest are pretty much the same.

more variety next time please.

Nice girl:winkwink:

Good for Bikini/amateur sites,not good for hardcore obviously

Don't sweat it, you won't miss that TGP's 4 clicks per day anyways

Anyone ever notice the guys with the most rules seem to have the least amount of traffic?

i don't hit it!

I haven't submitted to Richard's Realm in a long time because his reviewers must be certifiably insane. They'll even reject panty fetish galleries or upskirt galleries because of "not enough nudity"! It's crazy! They do realize that some people have clothing fetishes, right? Obviously not. :mad: