IS CCBIll doing a sweep today?
 

Just got an email about a processing site rejection. Apparently, they or VISA one or the other, isn't willing to process a certain site for me,

"I regret to inform you that we are not able to continue processing for your account. We have been required to make revisions in what is acceptable. The inclusion of Obscene and Malicous Content, and related content is a direct reflection of these changes. This restriction applies to existing accounts, as well as new accounts. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact us at the numbers listed below or our Policy Review Director "

Anybody get these today?

i got an error this morning when logging into my ccbill account i still can't get in im waiting for a response from them i get an error saying IP LOCKED and it has a login button i was like wtf is that all about it's never happend before... :helpme

" IP locked " means you tried to log in too many times with the wrong password. Call them...


:2 cents:

Ivy

I think thats something with theyre java layout and maybe a recent alteration with your indivudal PC, you tried to login to many times, for somer eason wasnt able to.

ah ty yeah it took me a few tries before i remembered my pass ha thanks for help

Been a few CCBill cock up threads today....

They r up to someting

I called, I have to wait four hours until the review board gets there, pretty shitty being as I have traffic being sent to the site in question, they have been processing for it for a couple weeks at that. now out of no where, it lost its approval, not sure if its through ccbill or visa. I guess I will know in four hours.

What site is it?

Been up and running for a couple weeks, all ready has members, traffic, etc.

http://www.facialism.com

If they're calling that "Obscene and Malicous Content" then we're going to see a lot of sites lose their processing. Wow.

The contnet is really pretty soft, as far as bj/cum content goes, just curious if its the heat they think they might get b/c of the nature or mocking end of it.

got some broken images
http://www.paycheckpimp.com/

at least I get them

Nah, I dont see any broken images, what is appearing broken?

I bet they are basing it on thinking the drawing of crosses with cum on the girls' foreheads is going to offend people.

Of course it will offend people if theyre closed minded enough, thats what makes it different, or at least noticeable, as far as conversions, whether my own or any sponsor I have ever used I get my best ratios on non-redundant sites.

Hate to say it but I don't see anything malicious....Unless it's referring to the church/religion connection...

But I haven't been inside the site so ya never know...Tours can always be deceptive.

are you serious? that site lost processing?! looks pretty tame to me, even by amerikan standards..

Jact took the words right out of my mouth.

I'm thinking it got dropped because of the religious overtones. The angels, commandments, crosses and such. It was probably some christian person at CCBill that looked at the site and got offended. It might of even of been some christian person complaining to CCBill about the site. Maybe even both. A christian person at CCBill and a christian visitor complaining.

I'm almost sure it's because of the religious overtones and a person at CCBill getting upset.

everything running smooth with ccbill over here....

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Ivy

Lol, more then likely, I am on the phone with them now on hold, lets see.

Wow, it was the "Religious" overtones, CCBill has no problem with it but the back they use does, I am too call back Monday and talk to my account representative on it. I just find it real funny, with all the fucked up shit on the internet this is causing a problem. My apologies to the people currently prmoting this site and I will look into a fix as we speak, thanks. :mad:

religious overtones? gimme a break... all the sites out there with girls fucking crosses and what not... are they terming all the sites with religious "overtones?"

cause there are tons of them out there... and I don't want to change my fucking link codes either dammit

I think its BS too, CCBill clamis its ok but the bank is the issue, more then likely it offended some bank guy with the decision, however if some of this other shit ccbill processes deosnt offend someone please let me know.

Before bringing this to the boards you should have signed up with another processor or two even . Now all the processors who read GFY will know you are having problems with CCBill and not want to process for your site, which by the way looks extremely cool its a pity you may have to re design it now ?




:thumbsup

I got my pregnant site rejected yesterday, had to redesign it. There was a video of two twin girls, one of which is pregnant, masturbating on the same couch. They said it was incest.

The thing abou this site, it was all ready approved up running, with members, a little late to backout, seeing what can be done about it still.

As I always say, its the fucking chrsitians STILL TRYING to control us.

As pagan they burned us, and now as pornographers they try to squeeze us from the inside.

its time to give these bastards a taste of their own medicine.

I think is bullshit.. freedom of speech... but anyways perhaps some nut in CCBill found it ofensive and want to make things difficult..

I think Visa controls this issue more than the processors. I would think no matter what, they would all have the same response...:2 cents:

Thats similar to what they told me over the phone, theyre "bank." Prob. Visa, but how much fucked up things does VISA process? Is there not freedom of religion, in this day and age? Who cares who the fuck it offends.

man this is going to suck if they really start to pull sites.

while some of us dont find sites like this offensive, many do.

i guess its only a matter of time before they start the squeeze even more.

more this shit happens makes me want to just push softcore non nude 18+ hahaha

what can they possibly find offensive about girls that arent even naked! I bet they could find something thoe christians sons of bitches
if they start pulling a bunch of sites, this could suck having to pull links etc.

there are MANy sites who use cc bill and are worst than signs of the cross in cum.

;)

i'm a bit confused w/ this whole thing, it is supposedly the acquiring bank itself that doesn't like this site? since when do that actual banks on the backend check sites themselves? i thought that only happened at the processor and at VISA itself..?

KristianF as soon as i saw your post on Cozy, i knew it was because of the religious theme... sucks that it is due to that

the site would have been even more "real" if it was with 18 y.o. boys and a priest, just like in real life churches...

:1orglaugh

Lol, I just told them, I guess an alter boy site, would be crossing the line. My last call................basically I would have to change the tour, rid the religious overtones, and cut the final couple of seconds, "the facial basically." I could be back and running. Hence, final re-approval. However, facialism, would be facial-less, lol. I should have made a site, where I facefuck the girls, rip off their head and piss down they're throat then it all be ok.

or jam a bong in their pussy and smoke illegal herbs while fucking them.

*note, beaverBong converts great and is a cool site, not bashing it in anyway, just stating how ridiculous it is to have the religious win in this situation.

let me guess they didn't like "the 10 cocksucking commandments"?

:1orglaugh

Thats some fucked up shit, I feel for ya and hope it all works out. That reason they used was pretty piss-poor IMHO

whatever they have to do to stay in bsuiness they should do.

Get real fuckin people for god sake already, on this business you dont play with trouble you cut the trouble off.

The list of processors who thought they can fuck with Visa is the list of processors that are GONE.

So grab your balls take a deep breath and think real not fuckin stupid.

Hm..if we're going to start having problems with sites that "insult" the religion of a high mucky muck in a bank, how long before all gay sites start to be considered, insulting?

For public record, its not CCBill but funding banks. I started this thread originally for the thinking was it was a site sweep, maybe. Just not want I wanted to be dealing w/ on a Saturday morning. The other site is up and running for the affiliates still promoting, we are working on the problem now, to get facialism back together. Really we dont want to remove the site, nor the theme, if we have to comply we have to comply, doesn't mean we are happy about it. And yes it is business, I could understand the lack of not wanting to jepordize on ccbill's behalf. The site should be running again on Monday, once we are given a clear outline on how to redesign it.

no shit... they need to stick the laws and one set of rules, not just what offends the guy who happens to be reviewing sites for approval that day.... it shouldnt be based on one persons opinion of the site.

u guys laugh, but this is the reason ive never done an altar boy / priest reality site. i had it all worked out but was advised by the processor not to even bother doing it because it'd never pass.

Prob. the only reason gay sites arent insulting b/c it would be a direct attack for know other reason other then prejudice of a class of people. Know would want to deal with all the lawsuits.

http://www.priestsandprostitutes.com/

clicking to join page it says account inactive :(

was that site pulled too or just not activated yet maybe?

Hey RedMonkey,

If you run into problems finding a billing processor for your site, get ahold of me. Just send me a email
gfy AT paywide.com
or call me toll free
1.877.PAYWIDE
Make sure to tell me what site it's for so that I know it's you.

Lol just maybe!

Imho it is too over the top with the religious motif.

hmm... "funding banks"..? again, i just don't see the processors actual acquiring banks checking sites one by one like this, that doesn't make any sense. i believe this is the first mention i've ever heard of someone losing processing due to the backend acquiring banks not liking the content or feel of a site, is this a sign of some new step that has been introduced in the acceptance phase for sites..?

agreed. some folks take religion pretty seriously. best not to push that envelope.

They're dumb sheep...

Religion is the downfall of mankind.