should libraries censor based on the beliefs of a few?
 

http://www.365gay.com/newscon04/04/042104bookBan.htm

thats pretty lame, comparing a children's book to playboy

its nice to know that someone thinks MY life is "filth"

if the kid doesnt wanna read it, dont make him. how easy is that? but instead the "moral majority" want to just destroy anything that goes against their beliefs. somehow they think they have the right to tell other people how to raise their kids, and what their kids can and cannot read.

Libraries censor so much else (pornography, "right wing" literature, for example), so why get all worked up over someone asking to remove a book aiming at turning kids into wannabe homos? It's not political, it's just fucking sick.

Censorship is bad, if you give them an inch, they will take a foot.

It's that superhero stance that "I need to protect the WORLD from this because I don't care for it" mentality that I love.

I agree that censorship is bad, but it's FUCKING FUNNY to see the cards turned at the homos, who normally are at the forefront of the loser organizations that actively work for free speech limitations such as "racism and homophobia" laws and whatnot.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

just fuck off already

you know you like it hard up the ass....you're so far in the closet, you're finding Christmas presents...not that there's anything wrong with that....

And what exactly do you base that on? I have said it before and I am going to say it again; you homos are so typical it's not funny any more. Whenever you meet any resilience whatsoever, you start to accuse everybody of being in the closet and "hiding" being "just like you." How convenient. :1orglaugh I used to think it's about inferiority complexes, but now I wonder if it is not just something simple like being completely void of arguments. What do you think about this?

Books are supposed to educate, right?